Wednesday, 10 October 2012

End of Men Rise of Women - Matriarchy is Here!


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."

Men are now becoming nothing but “Macho Decorations” but their role as Dominators IS OVER Rasa Von Werder newsletter 10 10 12 From Guru Rasa Von Werder: http://www.npr.org/2012/09/10/160131630/end-of-men-heralds-new-era-of-female-dominance WOMEN ARE TAKING OVER JOBS, EDUCATION & THEREFORE THE FAMILY & WORLD IS CHANGING INTO MATRIARCHY – JUST AS WILLIAM BOND & I HAVE BEEN PREDICTING FOR YEARS – AS WE ALSO SAID, THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MALE & FEMALE ARE CHANGING DRASTICALLY – WHO IS THE BREADWINNER, WHO IS THE HEAD OF THE FAMILY? WHAT IS THE ROLE/IDENTITY OF THE MAN NOW? WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THE FEMALE? WELL IS IT NOT OBVIOUS, THE WOMEN WILL DOMINATE & CONTROL THE MEN, ONCE AGAIN, SHERLOCK...THE WRITING IN ON THE WALL. JOURNALIST HANNA ROSIN CONFIRMS ALL THAT WE SAID September 10, 2012 Women have fought tirelessly to establish equal footing for themselves in relationships, politics and the workplace, and according to writer Hanna Rosin, they've finally arrived. In her new book, The End of Men: And The Rise of Women, Rosin argues that the U.S. has entered an era of female dominance. Interview Highlights On how the rise of women is largely an economic story "Women make up about half the workforce and the majority of college degrees — which these days is the prerequisite to success in this world. But ... I discovered that this had seeped into the fabric of our lives — our intimate relationships, our marriages, all the decisions we make in life — and that was the big surprise in reporting the book." On shifts in the workforce that sparked shifts at home "The latest job numbers show that men are at their lowest labor force participation rate since 1948. They also show that the manufacturing economy has lost almost 6 million jobs, and just about the same number of jobs were added in the health-care industry and the service economy which are largely dominated by women. You can see right there that that creates a different kind of economy. Hanna Rosin is the co-founder of Slate's Double X blog. She is also a senior editor at The Atlantic. Nina Subin/Riverhead Books Hanna Rosin is the co-founder of Slate's Double X blog. She is also a senior editor at The Atlantic. "If our assumption is that the men are the breadwinners ... that men carry the family, when that dynamic shifts, you can see that relationships shift with it. So we have to redefine what we mean by 'head of the household' ... by 'manly virtues,' and what women do, and what men do, and how marriage works, and who raises the children. All these things start to change along with it." On the disappearance of American manufacturing jobs "It's sad ... it's a tragedy. I think we're in a transition moment where men have to rethink what they want to do and we as a society have to figure out what we want to do. ... A lot of men who were able to live a very respectable middle-class and even upper-middle-class existence doing essentially brawn jobs can no longer do that. So what do you do with that fact? You're not going to have every man become a nurse or have every man become a profession that we consider feminized because I think men are uncomfortable with that idea. "... I think that the million-dollar question for economists is why women have heard the call of the changing economy. Why it is that they've been more flexible than men have been?" On the finance and tech sectors remaining largely closed off to women, and the fact that women still make 78 cents to men's dollar "It's only been 40 years that this has been happening. I think it would be crazy to expect that the entire world flips upside down right away. ... It's obvious to me that people are still in this transition moment [and] somewhat uncomfortable with female power. So one thing I do in the book is ... talk to women who work in Silicon Valley, who work on Wall Street, in places where this transition is not complete and see what their reality is like and how you move to the next level." On when Wall Street will have female CEOs "I actually think finance is going to be the last one to go. They're going to hold on the hardest. But I definitely imagine that for a lot of other industries [women will soon fill positions of leadership]. If you look at someone like Marissa Mayer who gets a CEO job at Yahoo when she is visibly pregnant and gets to say that she doesn't want to take all that much maternity leave — whatever we think about that — it's wonderful that that model exists and that women can be that person because they're figuring it out — we're figuring it out."


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."

 ......................................................................................................... Excerpt: The End of Men: And the Rise of Women http://www.npr.org/books/titles/160130648/the-end-of-men-and-the-rise-of-women?tab=excerpt#excerptIntroduction “The story was no longer about the depths men had sunk to; that dynamic had been playing out for several decades and was more or less played out. The new story was that women, for the first time in history, had in many ways surpassed them.” This world has always belonged to males, and none of the reasons given for this have ever seemed sufficient. — Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex In 2009, in a beach town in Virginia where my family had been vacationing for several years, I noticed something curious. Every time I ventured away from the houses rented by the vacationers — to the supermarket, say, or the ice cream store — I almost never saw any men. Hardly any showed up at the fairgrounds Saturday evenings, nor did many climb out of the cars in the church parking lots on Sunday mornings, as they had in previous years. This was a prosperous working- class town, and one of its main businesses had always been construction. I recalled in earlier years seeing groups of men riding in pickup trucks down the main streets, even on Saturdays. But this time, there weren't all that many pickup trucks; mostly Chevys and Toyotas filled with women and children going about their weekend business. On a food run one afternoon, I accidentally slammed my cart into another woman's and knocked out of it some granola bars that had been balanced on a giant box of Cheerios. I apologized and she was forgiving, and in fact she turned out to be the kind of stranger who is open to conversation. Her name was Bethenny, she told me. She was twenty-nine and ran a day care out of her house (hence, the Cheerios). She was also studying to get a nursing degree and raising her daughter, who was ten. Because she was so forthcoming I thought I'd edge closer to the heart of the matter. Was she married? I asked. No. Did she want to be? Kind of, she said, and spun me a semiironic fantasy of a Ryan Reynolds look-alike swooping in on a white horse, or maybe a white Chevy. Was there any mortal male who might qualify for the role? I asked. "Well, there's Calvin," she said, meaning her daughter's father. She looked over at her daughter and tossed her a granola bar and they both laughed. "But Calvin would just mean one less granola bar for the two of us." Bethenny seemed to be struggling in the obvious ways. Later I saw her at checkout, haggling over coupons. But she did not exactly read as the pitiable single mother type. There was genuine pleasure in that laugh, a hint of happy collusion in hoarding those granola bars for herself and her daughter. Without saying as much, she communicated to me what her daughter seemed already to understand and accept: By keeping Calvin at arm's length, Bethenny could remain queen of her castle, and with one less mouth to feed, they might both be better off. How is it that the father of her only child had so little hold on her? How could his worth be measured against the value of a snack? I got up the courage to ask her if I could contact Calvin, and she readily gave me his phone number. Over the next few months Calvin and I talked every few weeks, me always trying to figure out how he had become so invisible. He was a gentle, earnest type and hard not to like. He talked about all the jobs he'd held and hated and I gave him advice, about work and other important matters (such as how to operate the microwave at the 7-Eleven, a source of constant frustration during his midafternoon food runs). I had an idea that I might write a story about what was happening to guys like Calvin in the post–manufacturing age, that Calvin might help me solve the mystery of those missing men. The terms "mancession" and "he-cession" featured prominently in headlines that year, their efforts at cuteness meant to soften the painful reality that the primary victims of our latest economic disaster had been men like Calvin, the ordained breadwinners. If these men had already been laid low by the recession of the 1990s, I wondered, where were they now, nearly twenty years later, after this last series of blows? And how would they find their way back? My hope was to stay in touch with Calvin long enough that he would start earning enough money to pick up the grocery bill again, that he would find his way home. Part of me kept imagining some distant point in the future when, like in the old Ladies Home Journal "Can This Marriage Be Saved?" series, Calvin and Bethenny would get back together and forge a happy trio, and in the dramatic crescendo of any imaginary reality series, the streets of the town would once again become peopled with men. But as I spent time with Calvin and dug into the research, I discovered that I had started with the wrong questions. Calvin and his friends were not really trying to get back the lives they'd once had, because those lives were no longer there to get back. I began to understand that something seismic had shifted the economy and the culture, not only for men but for women, and that both sexes were going to have to adjust to an entirely new way of working and living and even falling in love. Calvin was not going to drive up in a Chevy and take his rightful place at the head of the table one day soon, because Bethenny was already occupying that space, not to mention making the monthly payments on the mortgage, the kitchen renovation, and her own used car. Bethenny was doing too much but she was making it work, and she had her freedom. Why would she want to give all that up? The story was no longer about the depths men had sunk to; that dynamic had been playing out for several decades and was more or less played out. The new story was that women, for the first time in history, had in many ways surpassed them. The Calvins and Bethennys — all of us — had reached the end of two hundred thousand years of human history and the beginning of a new era, and there was no going back. Once I opened my eyes to that possibility, I realized that the evidence was everywhere, and it was only centuries of habit and history that prevented everyone from seeing it. With a lot more reporting and research, I was able to put a clear story together.


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."


In the Great Recession, three-quarters of the 7. 5 million jobs lost were lost by men. The worst-hit industries were overwhelmingly male, and deeply identified with macho: construction, manufacturing, high finance. Some of those jobs have come back, but the dislocation is neither random nor temporary. The recession merely revealed — and accelerated — a profound economic shift that has been going on for at least thirty years, and in some respects even longer. In 2009, for the first time in American history, the balance of the workforce tipped toward women, who continue to occupy around half of the nation's jobs. (The UK and several other countries reached tipping point a year later.) Women worldwide dominate colleges and professional schools on every continent except Africa. In the United States, for every two men who will receive a BA this year, for example, three women will do the same. Of the fifteen job categories projected to grow the most in the United States over the next decade, twelve are occupied primarily by women. Indeed, the US economy is becoming a kind of traveling sisterhood: Professional women leave home and enter the workforce, creating domestic jobs for other women to fill. Our vast and struggling middle class, where the disparities between men and women are the greatest, is slowly turning into a matriarchy, with men increasingly absent from the workforce and from home, and women making all the decisions. In the past, men derived their advantage largely from size and strength, but the postindustrial economy is indifferent to brawn. A service and information economy rewards precisely the opposite qualities — the ones that can't be easily replaced by a machine. These attributes — social intelligence, open communication, the ability to sit still and focus — are, at a minimum, not predominantly the province of men. In fact, they seem to come more easily to women. Women in poor parts of India are learning English faster than men, to meet the demands of new global call centers. Women own more than 40 percent of private businesses in China, where a red Ferrari is the new status symbol for female entrepreneurs. In 2009, Icelanders made Johanna Sigurdardottir prime minister, electing the world's first openly lesbian head of state. Sigurdardottir had campaigned explicitly against the male elite she claimed had destroyed the nation's banking system, vowing to end the "age of testosterone." Economic changes can shift and warp the culture, and in some countries the new breed of power women has landed as a shock. Japan is in a national panic over "herbivores," the cohort of young men who are refusing to date or have sex, and instead are spending their time gardening, organizing dessert parties, and acting cartoonishly feminine. The power women they are presumably too scared to date are known as "carnivores," or sometimes "hunters." In Brazil, church-based groups known as "Men of Tears" have proliferated to console the growing number of men whose wives make more money than they do. These changes have reached deep into the intimate lives of couples, shifting the way men and women worldwide think about marriage, love, and sex. In Asia, as women gain more economic power and retreat further from the culture's long-standing ideal of a perfect wife, the average age of marriage for women is thirty-two, and divorce in many Asian countries is skyrocketing. The mismatch between tradition-minded men and forward-marching women has given rise to an international market for spouses, as men around the world seek out brides with values (for now) more consonant with their own. In the West, meanwhile, women behave in sexually aggressive ways that would have been unimaginable even twenty years ago. In the United States, the relationship changes are playing out in vastly different, almost opposite ways in different classes.


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."

This point almost always gets confused, which is why I ended up writing two chapters on marriage rather than one. Our nation is splitting into two divergent societies, each with their own particular marriage patterns. One is made up of the 30 percent of Americans who have a college degree and the other is made up of everyone else — the poor, the working class, and what sociologists are calling the "moderately educated middle," meaning high school graduates who might have some technical training or college experience but not a full degree. In this large second group, the rise of women is associated with the slow erosion of marriage and even a growing cynicism about love. As the women in this second group slowly improve their lot, they raise the bar for what they want out of marriage — a Ryan Reynolds look-alike, a white Chevy. But the men of their class are failing to meet their standards. The men may cling to traditional ideals about themselves as providers, but they are further than ever from being able to embody those ideals. This is the class from which we draw our romantic notions of manhood, which inspired generations of country music and political speeches. But now the rising generation has come to think of lasting love as a fiction that lives on only in those speeches and pop songs. Among the educated class, women's new economic power has produced a renaissance of marriage. Couples in possession of college degrees are much more fluid about who plays what role, who earns more money, and, to some extent, who sings the lullabies. They have gone beyond equality and invented whole new models of marriage. I call these "seesaw marriages," where the division of earnings might be forty-sixty or eighty-twenty — and a year or two later may flip, giving each partner a shot at satisfaction. More wives at the top are becoming the main breadwinners for some period of time, and, as a result of this new freedom, more couples are describing their marriages as "happy" or "very happy." But even "happy" can hide complications. As I interviewed such couples, I realized that men, even if they check the "happy" box, are not nearly so quick or eager to inhabit these new flexible roles as women are. In fact throughout my reporting, a certain imaginary comic book duo kept presenting themselves to me: Plastic Woman and Cardboard Man. Plastic Woman has during the last century performed superhuman feats of flexibility. She has gone from barely working at all to working only until she got married to working while married and then working with children, even babies. If a space opens up for her to make more money than her husband, she grabs it. If she is no longer required by ladylike standards to restrain her temper, she starts a brawl at the bar. If she can get away with staying unmarried and living as she pleases deep into her thirties, she will do that too. And if the era calls for sexual adventurousness, she is game. She is Napoleonic in her appetites. As she gobbles up new territories she hangs on to the old, creating a whole new set of existential dilemmas (too much work and too much domestic responsibility, too much power and too much vulnerability, too much niceness and not enough happiness). Studies that track women after they get their MBAs have even uncovered a superbreed of Plastic Women: They earn more than single women and just as much as the men. They are the women who have children but choose to take no time off work. They are the mutant creature our society now rewards the most — the one who can simultaneously handle the old male and female responsibilities without missing a beat. Cardboard Man, meanwhile, hardly changes at all. A century can go by and his lifestyle and ambitions remain largely the same. There are many professions that have gone from all-male to female, and almost none that have gone the other way. For most of the century men derived their sense of manliness from their work, or their role as head of the family. A "coalminer" or "rigger" used to be a complete identity, connecting a man to a long lineage of men. Implicit in the title was his role as anchor of a domestic existence. Some decades into the twentieth century, those obvious forms of social utility started to fade. Most men were no longer doing physically demanding labor of the traditional kind, and if they were, it was not a job for life. They were working in offices or not working at all, and instead taking out their frustration on the microwave at the 7-Eleven. And as fewer people got married, men were no longer acting as domestic providers, either. They lost the old architecture of manliness, but they have not replaced it with any obvious new one. What's left now are the accessories, maybe the "mancessories" — jeans and pickup trucks and designer switchblades, superheroes and thugs who rant and rave on TV and, at the end of the season, fade back into obscurity.


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."

This is what critic Susan Faludi in the late 1990s defined as the new "ornamental masculinity," and it has not yet evolved into anything more solid. As a result men are stuck, or "fixed in cultural aspic," as critic Jessica Grose puts it. They could move more quickly into new roles now open to them — college graduate, nurse, teacher, full-time father — but for some reason, they hesitate. Personality tests over the decades show men tiptoeing into new territory, while women race into theirs. Men do a tiny bit more housework and child care than they did forty years ago, while women do vastly more paid work. The working mother is now the norm. The stay-at-home father is still a front-page anomaly. The Bem test is the standard psychological tool used to rate people on how strongly they conform to a variety of measures considered stereotypically male or female: " self-reliant," "yielding," "helpful," "ambitious," "tender," "dominant." Since the test started being administered in the mid-1970s, women have been encroaching into what the test rates as male territory, stereotypically defining themselves as "assertive," "independent," "willing to take a stand." A typical Bem woman these days is "compassionate" and "self – sufficient," "individualistic," and "adaptable." Men, however, have not met them halfway, and are hardly more likely to define themselves as "tender" or "gentle" than they were in 1974. In fact, by some measures men have been retreating into an ever-narrower space, backing away from what were traditionally feminine traits as women take over more masculine ones. For a long time, evolutionary psychologists have attributed this rigidity to our being ruled by adaptive imperatives from a distant past: Men are faster and stronger and hardwired to fight for scarce resources, a trait that shows up in contemporary life as a drive to either murder or win on Wall Street. Women are more nurturing and compliant, suiting them perfectly to raise children and create harmony among neighbors. This kind of thinking frames our sense of the natural order. But for women, it seems as if those fixed roles are more fungible than we ever imagined. A more female-dominated society does not necessarily translate into a soft feminine utopia. Women are becoming more aggressive and even violent in ways we once thought were exclusively reserved for men. This drive shows up in a new breed of female murderers, and also in a rising class of young female "killers" on Wall Street. Whether the shift can be attributed to women now being socialized differently, or whether it's simply an artifact of our having misunderstood how women are "hardwired" in the first place, is at this point unanswerable, and makes no difference. Difficult as it is to conceive, the very rigid story we believed about ourselves is obviously no longer true. There is no "natural" order, only the way things are. Lately we are starting to see how quickly an order we once considered "natural" can be overturned. For nearly as long as civilization has existed, patriarchy — enforced through the rights of the firstborn son — has been the organizing principle, with few exceptions. Men in ancient Greece tied off their left testicle in an effort to produce male heirs; women have killed themselves (or been killed) for failing to bear sons. In her iconic 1949 book The Second Sex, the French feminist Simone de Beauvoir suggested that women so detested their own "feminine condition" that they regarded their newborn daughters with irritation and disgust. Now the centuries-old preference for sons is eroding — or even reversing. "Women of our generation want daughters precisely because we like who we are," breezes one woman in Cookie magazine. In the 1970s, the biologist Ronald Ericsson came up with a way to separate sperm carrying the male- producing Y chromosome from those carrying the X. He sent the two kinds of sperm swimming down a glass tube through ever-thicker albumin barriers. The sperm with the X chromosome had a larger head and a longer tail, and so, he figured, they would get bogged down in the viscous liquid. The sperm with the Y chromosome were leaner and faster and could swim down to the bottom of the tube more efficiently. The process, Ericsson said, was like "cutting out cattle at the gate." The cattle left flailing behind the gate were of course the X's, which seemed to please him. Ericsson had grown up on a ranch in South Dakota, where he'd developed his cowboy swagger and mode of talking. Instead of a lab coat, he wore cowboy boots and a cowboy hat, and doled out his version of cowboy poetry. The right prescription for life, he would say, was "breakfast at five thirty, on the saddle by six, no room for Mr. Limp Wrist." In 1979, he loaned out his ranch as the backdrop for the iconic Marlboro Country cigarette ads because he believed in the campaign's central image — "a guy riding on his horse along the river, no bureaucrats, no lawyers," he recalled when I spoke to him. "He's the boss." He would sometimes demonstrate the sperm selection process using cartilage from a bull's penis as a pointer. In the late 1970s, he leased the method to clinics around the United States, calling it the first scientifically proven method for choosing the sex of a child. Feminists of the era did not take kindly to the lab cowboy and his sperminator. "You have to be concerned about the future of all women," said Roberta Steinbacher, a nun turned social psychologist, in a 1984 People profile of Ericsson. Given the "universal preference for sons," she foresaw a dystopia of mass-produced boys that would lock women in to second-class status while men continued to dominate positions of control and influence. "I think women have to ask themselves, 'Where does this stop?' “she said. "A lot of us wouldn't be here right now if these practices had been in effect years ago." Ericsson laughed when I read him these quotes from his old antagonist. Seldom has it been so easy to prove a dire prediction wrong.


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."

In the 1990s, when Ericsson looked into the numbers for the two dozen or so clinics that use his process, he discovered, to his surprise, that couples were requesting more girls than boys. The gap has persisted, even though Ericsson advertises the method as more effective for producing boys. In some clinics, he has said, the ratio of preference is now as high as two to one. Polling data on Americans' sex preference in offspring is sparse, and does not show a clear preference for girls. ********************************* Did male dominance exist? Of course it existed. But it seems to be gone now. And the era of the firstborn son is totally gone."****************************** But the picture from the doctor's office unambiguously does. A newer method for sperm selection, called Micro- Sort, is currently awaiting clinical approval from the Food and Drug Administration. The girl requests for that method run at about 75 percent. The women who call Ericsson's clinic these days come right out and say, "I want a girl"; they no longer beat around the bush. "These mothers look at their lives and think their daughters will have a bright future their mother and grandmother didn't have, brighter than their sons, even," says Ericsson, "so why wouldn't you choose a girl?" He sighs and marks the passing of an era. "Did male dominance exist? Of course it existed. But it seems to be gone now. And the era of the firstborn son is totally gone." Ericsson's extended family is as good an illustration of the rapidly shifting landscape as any other. His twenty-seven-year-old granddaughter — "tall, slender, brighter than hell, with a take-noprisoners personality" — is a biochemist and works on genetic sequencing. His niece studied civil engineering at the University of Southern California. His grandsons, he says, are bright and handsome, but in school "their eyes glaze over. I have to tell 'em: 'Just don't screw up and crash your pickup truck and get some girl pregnant and ruin your life.' " Recently Ericsson joked with the old boys at his elementary school reunion that he was going to have a sexchange operation. "Women live longer than men. They do better in this economy. More of 'em graduate from college. They go into space and do everything men do, and sometimes they do it a whole lot better. I mean, hell, get out of the way — these females are going to leave us males in the dust." The shift is apparent not only in the United States, but in many of the world's most advanced economies. For several centuries South Korea constructed one of the most rigid patriarchies on the planet. Many wives who failed to produce male heirs were abused and treated as domestic servants; some families prayed to spirits to kill off girl children. Now that preference for firstborn sons — or any sons — has vanished. Over the last few years the government has conducted a national survey of future parents, asking, "If you found out you were pregnant, what sex would you want your child to be?" In 2010, 29. 1 percent of women said they preferred a boy as their firstborn child, and 36. 3 percent said a girl (the rest answered "no preference"). For men, the gap was even higher, with only 23 percent choosing a boy and 42. 6 percent a girl. It took an imaginary third child, after two hypothetical daughters, for people to say they'd prefer a boy, and then by only a tiny margin. From a feminist standpoint, the recent social, political, and economic gains of women are always cast as a slow, arduous form of catch-up in the continuing struggle for gender equality. But a much more radical shift seems to have come about. Women are not just catching up anymore; they are becoming the standard by which success is measured. "Why can't you be more like your sister?" is a phrase that resonates with many parents of school-age sons and daughters, even if they don't always say it out loud. As parents imagine the pride of watching a child grow and develop and succeed as an adult, it is more often a girl than a boy that they see in their mind's eye. Yes, the United States and many other countries still have a gender wage gap. Yes, women still do most of the child care. And yes, the upper reaches of power are still dominated by men. But given the sheer velocity of the economic and other forces at work, these circumstances are much more likely the last artifacts of a vanishing age rather than a permanent configuration. Dozens of undergraduate women I interviewed for this book assumed that they very well might be the ones working while their husbands stayed at home, either minding the children or simply looking for work. Guys, one college senior remarked to me, "are the new ball and chain." It may be happening slowly and unevenly, but it's unmistakably happening: The modern economy is becoming a place where women hold the cards. In the year since I wrote the story in The Atlantic magazine story that inspired this book, I have been called a radical feminist for trumpeting women over men and an antifeminist for suggesting that the struggles are over for women. I am neither of those things, but my findings do herald both straightforward progress for women on some fronts and tremendous headaches on others. Women like Bethenny — my friend from the town of vanishing men — have a kind of ambiguous independence right now. They are much less likely to be in abusive relationships, much more likely to make all the decisions about their lives, but they are also much more likely to be raising children alone. It's a heavy load. One reporting experience that lingers with me is waking up a woman in the elevator at a community college in Kansas City. Between floors one and four she had fallen asleep, so hard had she been working to get her degree, hold down a night job, and raise three kids. Among the college-educated class, ambivalence comes in the form of excess choice. Educated women take their time finding the perfect partner, seeking out creative, rewarding jobs, and then come home and parent their children with homeschooling intensity. Their lives are rich with possibilities their mothers never dreamed of. And yet in most surveys women these days are not more likely to rate themselves happier than women did in the 1970s. Choice creates its own set of anxieties — new spheres to compete in and judge yourself wanting, a constant fear that you might be missing out. Men today, especially young men, are in a transition moment. They no longer want to live as their fathers did, marrying women they can't talk to, working long hours day after day, coming home to pat their kids on the head absentmindedly.


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."

They understand that the paternal white boss, like the one on The Office, has now become a punch line. But they can't turn away from all that because they fear how power and influence could be funneled away from them: by wives who earn more money than they do, jobs with less prestige, tedious Tuesday afternoons at the playground. There are plenty of opportunities for men. Theoretically, they can be anything these days: secretary, seamstress, PTA president. But moving into new roles, and a new phase, requires certain traits: flexibility, hustle, and an expansive sense of identity. I started this book thinking that we were heading into a woman's world, and that this world would reflect some set of "womanly values" as defined by the Bem test — "tender," "yielding," "compassionate." But by the end of my research I became less convinced that what has happened to women and men reveals or is the result of any such fixed values or traits. Assuming a world run by women is more "tender" seems to me, again, just a story we tell ourselves to make the current massive upheavals in gender roles seem tamer and more predictable, when they are anything but: more like revolutionary, potentially exhilarating, and sometimes frightening, but altogether inevitable. So the least we can do is to see them clearly. Excerpted from The End of Men by Hanna Rosin. Copyright 2012 by Hanna Rosin. Excerpted by permission of Riverhead Books. http://www.womanthouartgod.com/escape_patriarchy.php All educated informed people who do internet today Zarchian realize that it is mostly the US govt. that does all these "terrorist" acts - The govt. did Oklahoma City bombing, the govt. created AIDS, Ebola, Sars, the govt. is using biowarfare against humanity. I put some imp. links here, look them up, there are many more...."Garden Plot" - They have concentration camps ready with ovens over 2,500 degrees for us - they have underground & overground concentration camps that can hold millions.....they are training police to round up citizens, while citizens are screaming....what is their purpose? Slavery of most of the human race, they cannot manage all of us, they want to kill 80% of us, they started with the black people in Africa, killing them with their invention AIDS, NOW THEY ARE TAKING OVER THE LANDS OF THE PEOPLE THEY KILLED - IN AFRICA - They want to take the 20% of humanity that is left, put them into cities micro chipped, use them as work slaves....If any of them complains, CUT OFF THEIR MICROCHIP.


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."

Then they cannot "buy or sell" get food or medical, do anything, they are like dead people, might as well be dead - no one will help as it is like Hitler's Germany, they will kill you if you help.....This is called "conspiracy theories" except they are facts, not theories.......This is PATRIARCHY - RULE BY THE FATHER. The Roman, Greek, Sparta times were no better - when men rule WE HAVE HELL. THAT IS WHY THE MOST ADVANCED PEOPLE, CALLED BY GOD, ARE ALL WORKING FOR MATRIARCHY - WOMAN IS THE ONLY HOPE. THERE IS SO MUCH MORE....I HAVE HUNDREDS OF LINKS. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` THIS IS QUITE INTERESTING – THANK YOU WILLIAM BOND WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A MAN REFUSES TO HONOR THE GODDESS? ANSWER: DEATH – HE DROWNS, AMAZING THE HIDDEN MEANING OF SOME LYRICS! The Meaning of the Lyrics of "A Whiter Shade Of Pale" There does seem to be a lot of confusion about what the words of the popular song "A Whiter Shade of Pale" by Keith Reid mean. Anyway these are the lyric for them. We skipped the light fandango turned cartwheels 'cross the floor I was feeling kinda seasick but the crowd called out for more The room was humming harder as the ceiling flew away When we called out for another drink the waiter brought a tray The first verse simply describes a drunken party, but saying that, "the ceiling flew away" suggests they were also taking hallucinogenic drugs as well. And so it was that later as the miller told his tale that her face, at first just ghostly, turned a whiter shade of pale In the chorus line, it is recognized by most people that the song's lyrics were referring to "The Miller's Tale" in "Canterbury Tales" by Geoffrey Chaucer written in the 14th century. This is an extremely crude story, where two student lust after a carpenter's wife and one gets tricked into, ""kissed her naked arse full savorly". This behaviour is symbolic of a extreme act of worship. A Goddess likewise would be expected to be worshipped. Then in the last line of the chorus we are told that, her face turned "A whiter shade of pale". At the time these lyrics were written was a fairly popular book called, "The White Goddess" by the poet Robert Graves. The very fact that this mysterious woman had a ghostly white face suggests she was the White Goddess as portrayed by Robert Graves. She hints at this in the next two lines. She said, 'There is no reason and the truth is plain to see.' But the narrator of these lyrics refuses to take the hint. But I wandered through my playing cards and would not let her be In these two lines he shows he not only doesn't recognize her as a Goddess but was also disrespectful of her as well. one of sixteen vestal virgins who were leaving for the coast The references to Vestal Virgins is interesting, as they worshipped the Goddess Vesta. This priestess order was older than the Roman Empire as it seems that Rhea Silvia, the mother of Romulus and Remus, the founders of Rome, was a Vestal Virgin. At the beginning of the Roman Empire the Vestal Virgins held high status in Rome, as they were the " Keepers of the Flame", and if it was to go out, then it was believed, Rome would fall. But over the years their status was slowly undermined. Then when Rome became Christianised, the Vestal Virgins were turned into nuns, and the sacred flame was put out. Then true to the ancient prophecy, Rome started to deteriorate through civil war and invasion and finally collapsed. and although my eyes were open they might have just as well've been closed So even though again there was another hint at her Goddess status, the narrator still refuses to recognize who she was. She said, 'I'm home on shore leave,' though in truth we were at sea The fact they disagreed if they were on shore or at sea, might be about there mental states, she felt safe and secure with her "feet on the ground" but he was, "all at sea". so I took her by the looking glass and forced her to agree Again he is very disrespectful and forces his opinions onto her. saying, 'You must be the mermaid who took Neptune for a ride.' He is now willing to recognize her supernatural status by saying she is a mythical mermaid but is still is not willing to see her as a Goddess. But she smiled at me so sadly that my anger straightway died She is obviously trying to save him and was clearly sad, he was rejecting her help. If music be the food of love then laughter is its queen It seems he was still intoxicated and enjoying the party he was in. and likewise if behind is in front then dirt in truth is clean The paradoxes in these two lines suggest he was unable to see the reality of his situation, which was the opposite of what he thought it was. My mouth by then like cardboard seemed to slip straight through my head He is now saying he has a hangover. So we crash-dived straightway quickly and attacked the ocean bed These two lines suggest he was drowned. So the moral of the story is that because he failed to recognize a Goddess who wanted save him and gave her no respect, he was left to go down in his path of self destruction. Robert Graves in his books would say this is true of the whole human race. We once worshipped Goddesses and revered and respected women but with the rise of male gods and patriarchy the human race is now on a course of self-destruction.


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."

 .................................................................................................................. Discussion with friends re. removing Patriarchal males like a cancer from our society – a friend wishes she could get rid of them all in an instant: Rasa says: the disease is PATRIARCHY - RULE BY THE FATHER, THE MAN....Many of us are now in agreement it is a MAN THING, not a human thing, a woman thing, A MAN THING.....The only answer is MATRIARCHY, WOMEN HAVE TO TAKE OVER. Jane you are righteously in a rage - when one confront evil of this magnitude, that is the feeling....But God does NOT GIVE US THE OPTION OF ERADICATING PATRIARCHY, EVIL MEN, INSTANTLY, RIGHT NOW. Fantasizing about it is one thing to do. You can imagine it, but it will not happen. What does God give us the option of doing? Working at our full capacity, every believer, the machinery of time moves on, slowly but surely, Female Empowerment comes into being, ONE DEGREE AT A TIME, one enrichment of female at a time, one failure of one male at a time, millions of males failing to get their educational degrees, hundreds of thousands of men per year committing suicide, women getting healthier, men getting sicker........Men fail to take care of their health, women are learning organic foods, health regimens, they take care of themselves, they go for help when sick, they are stronger than men, they take less drugs & alcohol, they love their lives, they are not destructive to themselves. Besides being destructive to others, in general, males are also SELF DESTRUCTIVE. Let them destroy themselves, their karma has arrived. For those who are sincere in what they do, they work as much as they can, one day at a time. It’s all research, writing, promulgating, spreading the word, sharing information. This is what William Bond & I do almost daily. And we cannot do research on evil day in day out without it getting to us. We have to have relief, by having fun, by pleasurable activities, thoughts, feelings, otherwise you get “volunteer burn out” & you’re no use to anyone, not even yourself. Jane, don’t get volunteer burn out, seek relief from this work of exposing evil. `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Kamakhya give us some long scripts with details these guys are stupid...they learn from porno....all they talk about is butt fukking....they are sick...please post some good long scripts with details for these num nut porno addicted fools.....thank you....I am so busy doing other things, you would help a lot if you did this....In fact, if you could give them a script how to make love every day it would help heal their porno sickness....... ......................................................... PRAY AGAINST THE WORLD & ITS EVILS – PRAYER TO BRING ME BACK TO THE PLACE OF MOTHER GOD, HER VALHALLA, THE ONLY ESCAPE IS TO GO, INWARD, THE VALHALLA OF HEAVEN IS WITHIN, GO THERE PERIODICALLY TO ESCAPE MY FRIENDS, BECAUSE THIS EVIL WORLD & THE PEOPLE IN IT – WILL MAKE YOU SICK, DEPRESSED, BECAUSE THEY ARE SICK, SO THIS IS THE ESCAPE: “Mother God, take me away from all the thoughts & the feelings that go with them, of the world, the flesh, & people – of the devil. Life me up, rise me up out of time & space, out of this temporary Hell / Purgatory, into your reaches of Heaven. Remove from me my attachment to people & things, to worry about finances, insults, work to be done, disciplines, regimens, duties, all the shit of this world that never ends & keeps beating on my door, my back & my brain. Lift me up from all these thoughts, these connections; take me away from PEOPLE, not only the bad but the good because you get entangled by both. I cannot live in insult or consolation; I have to live in YOU. Make me impervious to compliments / flattery, false attention as well as insults & fake friends.....None of it is where I need to be, I must be in TRUTH & TRUTH ALONE. You are Truth, Mother God, make me impervious to people. Make me impervious to the things of the world. Make me impervious to be nobody or somebody in this world. Make me impervious to all the nonsense & the temporary glory or shame of this world. Take away from me all thoughts, & feelings connected with these thoughts. Lift me out of time & space, out of this world, my body, people & things. I am praying this prayer several times a day, what a relief it gives me.” GURU RASA 9 26 12


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."

................................................................................................... SEEING MALES AS SEX OBJECTS – IS IT EVIL? IS IT THE SAME AS WHAT THEY HAVE DONE TO US? Guru Rasa says “No” – When They Look Upon Us That Way They Degrade Us, But We Do Not Degrade Them As long as males hold the power they look upon us as "sex objects." When women hold the power, or they are emancipated, they will look upon men as "sex objects." This is INEVITABLE Shahar.....The evil of what men did to women & are still doing is that they DEGRADED US, humiliated us, deprived us of civil liberties & human rights, turned us into things as they did slaves or animals. To see someone as "sex object" or in a sexual way does not have to be degrading & dehumanizing........People fail to see the political subtleties here.....One can be attracted to the sexuality of another without degrading them, insulting them, but just seeing them as desirable. Men did not, do not do that to us, they purposefully have injured as as in pornography - body punishing us, teaching young people that vaginas have to be shaved, now teaching them to butt fukk women.......If you do not see the difference here, it is too bad, because there is a huge one........But about the group, if you read the intention, it is for the Pleasure of Women & the education of men in giving us pleasure. If this sounds bad to you, you are free to leave. My opinion of your perspective is that it is rather Patriarchal. You have not yet awakened to the true Feminist or Matriarchal Perspective, Female Empowerment. That is not easy to do - awaken to this - because we have been brainwashed for millennia, & it takes tremendous Light & effort to break out of the brainwash, mind control. ...................................................................................... Trying to annex black women & men into our friendship of Matriarchy. It became a monumental struggle of a few weeks when I finally gave up – it was too much hate coming from them. From Rasa Von Werder discussion with a black woman, Shahar Shahar – I read a few pages of your “womanist” point of view but have not yet gotten a good overview. You said you teach this? In a school or in a casual sense? I take note this means that the black culture is different than the white culture, & therefore its brand of “feminism” or “female empowerment” has to be different. Alright, that’s why I invited many black people to my Timeline & this group – so I could hear their voices. I also joined their groups, but do not have a total overview of what goes on there, either. I am studying. You posted a kind of poem, “How to Love a Man, Really Love Him.” This was a Patriarchal Manifesto of why we should take all the shit men give us & keep loving them, like there is something lacking in us, they just need more love. It was total Elephant sized bullcrap, because WE ALREADY LOVE THEM TOO MUCH, WE NEED TO STOP, IT IS THEY WHO NEED TO LEARN TO LOVE US, IT IS THEY WHO HAVE NO LOVE, THEY HAVE BEEN TAUGHT TO HATE US, THEY HAVE TO BE RETRAINED, NOT US. (Here I had made a mistake as another woman had posted that poem!) I would be happy to hear your brand of feminism & Female Empowerment from the “womanist”, black point of view. Please explain it to us.


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."

.............................................................................................. from RASA: Shahar you are on a fighting binge & want to argue with me over so many things. OK no problem, I have a little time, we air out issues, it's POSITIVE. Shahar we are not fools, we all know there are all kinds of men & women out there, the good, the bad & the ugly. We know of Enlightened, Spiritual men, we know of monsters. But speaking in general terms, the blame does fall upon the shoulders of HUMAN MALES. This is borne out by STATISTICS as to the MORAL BEHAVIOR OF MALES VS. FEMALE. Do you take us for fools here? We have great men on my groups, there are no wicked ones here that I know of. I have disciples here, William Sauer , Faith Love , Jonas Grazus & others. These men hold up my Matriarchal work, some have not been able to do anything yet - but Faith Love is going to college to be a Movie Producer & is going to produce a movie some day, on Matriarchy, maybe MY LIFE. None of us here separates sex from spirit either, we are EVOLVED, INTELLIGENT, EDUCATED, just like you. When I throw words around like "idiot” you have to take it in the context of how I give it. Most guys I am dating are to some degree "idiots" because they are VERY YOUNG, & we are all stupid when we are young. All my friends know where I'm coming from. It doesn't mean ALL MEN ARE IDIOTS. But most of the males who are young that we date, can be called "idots" in a JOKING MANNER - & in fact, my lady friends who are sharing all their man woes with me, who are dating older men, are saying most or all of them are idiots also. I guess the women who have the good guys aren't talking, as they have nothing to complain about. `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` from Rasa...Hey Shahar that's a great idea & I will take note from now on, but of course, they rephrase it so you cannot recognize that the concept came from myself or William Bond - William if you're out there, please affirm - what we have been preaching, myself from 2004 on the internet - you from like 1998 - Are not these academics now repeating those ideas in their own words? Were we ALL ALONE for YEARS - now in like the last two years, more so last year, they are POURING OUT ARTICLES & BOOKS THAT REITERATE WHAT WE HAVE SAID.....How did it happen? Did we see the writing on the wall & promulgate it ahead of them? Did they see our articles that I spammed, for instance on 600 yahoo groups for five years! It took me 2 years just to JOIN 600 groups! After I joined I spammed my articles nine hours a day, one day a week, for a year. Then a web man built me a "speedy spam" system that did in 20 mins. what previously had taken 9 hours.....I used that system for another two years before it crashed - I had reached millions with a thousand articles written by myself & William Bond. Matriarchy took hold also when William was one of the first people ever, to preach Matriarchy on You tube. William built nine lectures. I jumped on & built 300 lectures, which got FOUR MILLION HITS IN ONE YEAR. Then they deleted me, all was lost, but I reached millions for Matriarchy. One lecture got over 400,000 hits. Don't anyone tell me I don't know Matriarchy or William Bond doesn't know Matriarchy. ....................................................................................................................................... Racial Issues Guru Rasa Von Werder BTW when I posted on the black group, an item about not leaving children alone with men, this was POUNDING ALL MEN INTO THE GROUND? Pretty touchy, considering the statistics, all I talked about were the statistics. But it was not the man defiling me, & thereafter, he also defiled every friend of mine that showed up - Ka Los - Amber Dawn & others -This same man was nasty to you I saw......Why is he there allowed to shit on everyone? This was a severely dikk-whipped group, why do you stay there? My friends were outraged at the words that were spoken to me, I guess you must have liked them, you agree with the other black women. I left because of the black women who joined up with this man in the end. They are GANG RAPISTS. You call me insensitive? I am extremely sensitive - ask my disciples & friends, more sensitive than you can imagine. However, this is a WAR going on. The war is men vs women, the battle of the sexes. I am fighting a war, which males have won in the past & almost destroyed the entire planet. Now we are gaining the planet back from them. Don't tell me how to fight a war. Don't tell me to be SENSITIVE to the enemy that wants to destroy all animals, all humans, & then himself. This is an all-out destructive, Satanic Empire called Patriarchy - this is what I am fighting - & to say that I have no EMPATHY or REFUSE TO UNDERSTAND the plight of black people is totally wrong, when I am the one here & now trying to build a bridge between mostly black women & white women ......Let me add this. I posted a series of issues & questions that concerned black women....NOT ONE SINGLE WOMAN, BLACK OR WHITE, RESPONDED TO THE ISSUES. One woman did post a positive sentence. But the two women who had called me names the day before, jumped on to call me names again. I told them it was about issues, if they could not address the issues, shut up.....And yet, I am the villain here. How the Hell did I become the villain? No other white woman dares even speak about this stuff because they know they're gonna' get it. So they see I speak on it, & sure enough, I am getting it, I am getting lambasted here on my own group for trying to build bridges between black & white - I lack understanding, empathy, I don't get where black women are coming from. Shahara for the last time I ask you, where are black women coming from?


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."

.............................................................................................................................. ..................................................................................................................... WHY AM I THE TARGET FOR THE RAGE OF BLACK WOMEN? Posted on a mostly “black” most female group: Nzinga - they threatened my life - they attacked my body - they ridiculed my body - so I ridiculed their bodies.....Do you read the whole thread or are you just going to sit here & attack me also because I'm white & you hate me - I came here for the purpose of sisterhood among white & black women - I am the only white woman or man who's had the guts to go into black groups & try & make friends. The most vocal, loud ones have spent their rage onto me....is this all I'm going to get, rage, hate & unfairness on the threads? They can spend their rage onto me, calling me names, threatening me, ridiculing my body, which alright to you? But then I call them fat azzes back, this is not alright? Where is the logic here? Is this a black group that just hates white people & all that white people do is wrong, but all dark skinned people do is right? I had nothing to do with slavery & discrimination, hate or torture of dark skinned people. The dark skinned people of America, who are all mixed by now, what are they mixed with? They are mixed with, for one thing, the Master's blood on the plantation, the Masters who raped their great great grandmothers THESE MEN ARE IN THE BLOOD OF THE MIXED RACE PEOPLE OF AMERICA, so if these people are going to hate white people, hate the whites that are in your blood, that raped your great grandmothers - I had nothing to do with it. I am not German, I am Lithuanian/Mongolian born in Germany, I had nothing to do with this, my ancestors had nothing to do with it. The Massas who raped your ancestors are LIVING IN YOUR BLOOD SO HATE YOURSELF IF YOU WANNA HATE THEM, THEY ARE INSIDE YOU..............Furthermore, it was not the women who enslaved the ancestors of the dark people of America - it was the men.....so hate them, not women....women have themselves been enslaved first by men, it was the first conspiracy. They first enslaved women, took away all their human rights, in order to do all the damage they did on earth, including slavery of other humans....slavery of animals....torture & slaughter of animals, pollution, destroying the environment, ecology, destroying all life on this planet. It was the men who did it, not the women. Talk to the men, accuse the men, not to me, I HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE DESTRUCTION OF THE PLANET, TORTURE OF ANIMALS, FACTORY FARMING, POLLUTION, HATRED & EVIL, I DID NOT DO THESE THINGS SO ACCUSE THOSE WHO DID IT, ARE DOING IT....I DID NOT CREATE SLAVERY NOR DID I CREATE DISCRIMINATION, TALK TO THEM THAT DID IT. I AM HERE FOR SISTERHOOD, MATRIARCHY, UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN WOMEN. DARK SKINNED WOMEN OF AMERICA ARE PART AFRICAN, PART WHITE, MANY PART AMERICAN INDIAN.....THIS COUNTRY IS HEADING FOR BEING ALL MIXED, ALL BIRACIAL. WE WILL HAVE TO GET ALONG SOONER OR LATER. MOREOVER, WE ARE HEADING FOR MATRIARCHY. THE SISTERS HAVE TO GET TOGETHER, OF ALL RACES, SOONER OR LATER. WE HAVE TO MANAGE THE PLANET & RIGHT ALL THE WRONGS MEN HAVE DONE. SO I AM NOT THE ONE TO BE ATTACKED I AM WORKING FOR MOTHER GOD, MATRIARCHY & FEMALE EMPOWERMENT, THIS IS WHAT I AM HERE FOR, THIS IS WHAT I AM DOING. AND IF I AM GOING TO BE JUST A TARGET, A WHIPPING POST, I WILL NOT ANSWER THE ATTACKERS. WHY SHOULD I? I AM JUST HERE TO SHARE MY KNOWLEDGE, MY LOVE, MY UNDERSTANDING, MY ANOINTING - WHY ELSE WOULD I BE HERE? http://www.facebook.com/groups/111105395580365/ Rasa says: This concludes my attempt in friending the black women (& men) of this group into Matriarchy. They have too much hate against white people & myself personally. Those who are amenable to me, want to be with us & learn from me, have joined my groups. Kosmic Yoniverse fb group Group that attacked Rasa I am removing all ties with these people (have removed them from here) - God DEFEATED THEM on their own group, through my Voice with a Black Goddess as my partner. What Amunet is saying here is a LIE. There was no dialogue. As I remained on her group, as I spoke, the comments of those who agreed with me even LIKED ME were DELETED....there was no DIALOGUE. Many of my posts, threads & links were deleted, they took away my Voice so what is the point of being there?......That I cowered to them? Silly....they wish. It was 30 against one, my witty remarks were so caustic THEY DELETED MOST OF THEM........I will write an overview of who these people are, but I will make it SHORT & SWEET as I do not have time to waste with racist low lifes....The name of their philosophy is Nation of Gods & Earths Kosmic Yoniverse fb group Who they hate: (1) White people – esp. white women who date black men. (2) Black men who date white women (3) Anyone, black or white, who disagrees with them (4) Jews (5) Gays, homosexuals (6) Anyone successful – they call it being high & mighty, & they have to be “taken down” They make it a habit to target certain people & attack them mercilessly, I fell under their radar. They also rabidly attack their own if any one of them has the slightest criticism of the leaders or gang members. This (fb group Kosmic Yoniverse) is mostly women. They call the black men “suns & Kings” but the “suns (sons) & Kings rarely participate. They made one thread where they invited men to speak against me – not one single man showed up. What they Believe They believe the black woman, by virtue of her SKIN & RACE is God. The black man is also God, but the black woman is the main one. White women must bow to them because white women are not God. They believe that “their Gods” are returning to the earth & that the Sun will burn up all white people because white people don’t have enough melanin (color.) They believe that “4th dimensional beings” inhabit the earth & consume the energy/melanin of dark people. Please see “Nation of Gods & Earths” for further information....I began reading it & got the gist of it. It spinned off from the “Nation of Islam”. I don’t know how close this group adheres to the tenets of “The Nation of Gods & Earths” but it has some kinship to it. http://www.thetalkingdrum.com/nge.html


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."

............................................................................................... Men are terrified of a woman's depth of love and the energy that moves as a woman's sexuality and emotions. And, at the same time, men want nothing more in this life than to merge completely with a woman's devotional love and wild energy. Only as a man outgrows his fear can he handle a woman's tremendous love-energy without running. And only such a man is worthy of your devotional offering in a committed intimacy. ~ David Deida ..................................................................................................... "Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS. She taught her female models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES. She portrays males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male & female both." `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Who Was Lilith? Adam’s first wife was a relic of an early rabbinical attempt to assimilate the Sumero-Babylonian Goddess Belit-ili, or Belili, to Jewish mythology. To the Canaanites, Lilith was Baalat, the “Divine Lady.” On a tablet from Ur, ca. 2000 B.C., she was addressed as Lillake. Hebraic tradition said Adam married Lilith because he grew tired of coupling with beasts, a common custom of Middle-Eastern herdsmen, though the Old Testament declared it a sin (Deuteronomy 27:21). Adam tried to force Lilith to lie beneath him in the “missionary position” favored by male-dominant societies. Moslems were so insistent on the male-superior sexual position that they said, “Accused be the man who maketh woman heaven and himself earth.” Catholic authorities said any sexual position other than the male-superior one is sinful. But Lilith was neither a Moslem nor a Catholic. She sneered at Adam’s sexual crudity, cursed him, and flew away to make her home by the Red Sea. God sent angels to fetch Lilith back, but she cursed them too, ignored God’s command, so God had to produce Eve as Lilith’s more docile replacement. Lilith’s fecundity and sexual preferences show that she was a Great Mother of settled agricultural tribes, who resisted the invasions of nomadic herdsmen, represented by Adam. There may have been a connection between Lilith and the Etruscan divinity Leinth, who had no face and who waited at the gate of the underworld along with Eita and Persipnei (Hades and Perephone) to receive the souls of the dead. The underworld gate was a yoni, and also a lily, which had “no face.” Admission into the underworld was often mythologized as a sexual union. The lily or lilu (lotus) was the Great Mother’s flower-yoni, whose title formed Lilith’s name. The story of Lilith disappeared from the canonical Bible, but her daughters the lilim haunted men for over a thousand years. Well into the Middle Ages, the Jews were still manufacturing amulets to keep away the lilim, who were lustful she-demons given to copulating with men in their dreams, causing nocturnal emissions. Naturally, the lilim squatted on top of their victims in the position favored by ancient matriarchs. Greeks adopted the lilim and called them Larmiae, Empusae (Forcers-In), or Daughters of Hecate. Christians also adopted them and called them harlots of hell, or succubae, the female counterparts of incubi. Celibate monks tried to fend them off by sleeping with their hands crossed over their genitals, clutching a crucifix. It was said that every time a pious Christian had a wet dream, Lilith laughed. Another common name for Daughters of Lilith was Night-Hag. This term didn’t imply that they were ugly; on the contrary, they were supposed to be very beautiful. As with their brothers the incubi, they were presumed so expert at lovemaking that after an experience with a Night-Hag, a man couldn’t be satisfied with the love a mortal woman. – Barbara G. Walker, “The Women’s Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets” ..................................................................................................................................... “PAGAN” IDOLS WERE GODDESS WORSHIPPERS Christians were known throughout the world for their destruction of sacred icons and literature belonging to the so-called "pagan" or "heathen" religions. The worship of the earlier deities was suppressed and the temples destroyed, closed or converted into Christian churches, as so often happened, statues and historic records were obliterated by the missionary fathers of Christianity. Though the destruction was major, it was not total. Fortunately many objects had been overlooked, remnants that today tell their own version of the nature of those dread "pagan" rituals and beliefs. The enormous number of Goddess figurines that have been unearthed in excavations of the Neolithic and early historic periods of the Near and Middle East suggest that it may well have been the evident female attributes of nearly all of these statues that irked the advocates of the male deity. Most "pagan idols" had breasts. The writers of the Judeo-Christian Bible, as we know it, seem to have purposely glossed over the sexual identity of the female deity who was held sacred by the neighbors of the Hebrews in Canaan, Babylon and Egypt. The Old Testament does not even have a word for "Goddess." In the Bible the Goddess is referred to as Elohim, in the masculine gender, to be translated as god. But the Koran of the Mohammedans was quite clear. In it we read, "Allah will not tolerate idolatry . . . the pagans pray to females." - Merlin Stone, "When God Was A Woman" ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."



"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."



"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."


"Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN & MEN.  She portrays women as DOMINANT
GODDESSES, men as their BEAUTIFUL SEXY CONSORTS.  She taught her female
models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways, behave dominantly
toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY OVER MEN.  She
developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depicts women as
glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's fetish needs,
but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying themselves as
Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES.  She portrays
males as sex objects for females, not sex objects for males – this is a
new idea, as it is usually men who get their sex needs met through male &
female both."

No comments:

Post a Comment