 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
Rasa Von Werder newsletter 9 30 12
From Guru Rasa Von Werder:
http://www.npr.org/2012/09/10/160131630/end-of-men-heralds-new-era-of-female-dominance
WOMEN ARE TAKING OVER JOBS, EDUCATION & THEREFORE THE FAMILY & WORLD IS
CHANGING INTO MATRIARCHY – JUST AS WILLIAM BOND & I HAVE BEEN PREDICTING
FOR YEARS – AS WE ALSO SAID, THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MALE & FEMALE ARE
CHANGING DRASTICALLY – WHO IS THE BREADWINNER, WHO IS THE HEAD OF THE
FAMILY? WHAT IS THE ROLE/IDENTITY OF THE MAN NOW? WHAT IS THE STATUS OF
THE FEMALE? WELL IS IT NOT OBVIOUS, THE WOMEN WILL DOMINATE & CONTROL THE
MEN, ONCE AGAIN, SHERLOCK...THE WRITING IN ON THE WALL.
JOURNALIST HANNA ROSIN CONFIRMS ALL THAT WE SAID
September 10, 2012
Women have fought tirelessly to establish equal footing for themselves in
relationships, politics and the workplace, and according to writer Hanna
Rosin, they've finally arrived.
In her new book, The End of Men: And The Rise of Women, Rosin argues that
the U.S. has entered an era of female dominance.
Interview Highlights
On how the rise of women is largely an economic story
"Women make up about half the workforce and the majority of college
degrees — which these days is the prerequisite to success in this world.
But ... I discovered that this had seeped into the fabric of our lives —
our intimate relationships, our marriages, all the decisions we make in
life — and that was the big surprise in reporting the book."
On shifts in the workforce that sparked shifts at home
"The latest job numbers show that men are at their lowest labor force
participation rate since 1948. They also show that the manufacturing
economy has lost almost 6 million jobs, and just about the same number of
jobs were added in the health-care industry and the service economy which
are largely dominated by women. You can see right there that that creates
a different kind of economy.
Hanna Rosin is the co-founder of Slate's Double X blog. She is also a
senior editor at The Atlantic.
Nina Subin/Riverhead Books
Hanna Rosin is the co-founder of Slate's Double X blog. She is also a
senior editor at The Atlantic.
 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
"If our assumption is that the men are the breadwinners ... that men carry
the family, when that dynamic shifts, you can see that relationships shift
with it. So we have to redefine what we mean by 'head of the household'
... by 'manly virtues,' and what women do, and what men do, and how
marriage works, and who raises the children. All these things start to
change along with it."
On the disappearance of American manufacturing jobs
"It's sad ... it's a tragedy. I think we're in a transition moment where
men have to rethink what they want to do and we as a society have to
figure out what we want to do. ... A lot of men who were able to live a
very respectable middle-class and even upper-middle-class existence doing
essentially brawn jobs can no longer do that. So what do you do with that
fact? You're not going to have every man become a nurse or have every man
become a profession that we consider feminized because I think men are
uncomfortable with that idea.
"... I think that the million-dollar question for economists is why women
have heard the call of the changing economy. Why it is that they've been
more flexible than men have been?"
On the finance and tech sectors remaining largely closed off to women, and
the fact that women still make 78 cents to men's dollar
"It's only been 40 years that this has been happening. I think it would be
crazy to expect that the entire world flips upside down right away. ...
It's obvious to me that people are still in this transition moment [and]
somewhat uncomfortable with female power. So one thing I do in the book is
... talk to women who work in Silicon Valley, who work on Wall Street, in
places where this transition is not complete and see what their reality is
like and how you move to the next level."
On when Wall Street will have female CEOs
"I actually think finance is going to be the last one to go. They're going
to hold on the hardest. But I definitely imagine that for a lot of other
industries [women will soon fill positions of leadership]. If you look at
someone like Marissa Mayer who gets a CEO job at Yahoo when she is visibly
pregnant and gets to say that she doesn't want to take all that much
maternity leave — whatever we think about that — it's wonderful that that
model exists and that women can be that person because they're figuring it
out — we're figuring it out."
.........................................................................................................
 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
Men are now becoming nothing but “Macho Decorations” but their dole as
Dominators IS OVER
Rasa Von Werder newsletter 9 30 12
Excerpt: The End of Men: And the Rise of Women
http://www.npr.org/books/titles/160130648/the-end-of-men-and-the-rise-of-women?tab=excerpt#excerpt
Introduction
“The story was no longer about the depths men had sunk to; that dynamic
had been playing out for several decades and was more or less played out.
The new story was that women, for the first time in history, had in many
ways surpassed them.”
This world has always belonged to males, and none of the reasons given for
this have ever seemed sufficient. — Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex
In 2009, in a beach town in Virginia where my family had been vacationing
for several years, I noticed something curious. Every time I ventured away
from the houses rented by the vacationers — to the supermarket, say, or
the ice cream store — I almost never saw any men. Hardly any showed up at
the fairgrounds Saturday evenings, nor did many climb out of the cars in
the church parking lots on Sunday mornings, as they had in previous years.
This was a prosperous working- class town, and one of its main businesses
had always been construction. I recalled in earlier years seeing groups of
men riding in pickup trucks down the main streets, even on Saturdays. But
this time, there weren't all that many pickup trucks; mostly Chevys and
Toyotas filled with women and children going about their weekend business.
On a food run one afternoon, I accidentally slammed my cart into another
woman's and knocked out of it some granola bars that had been balanced on
a giant box of Cheerios. I apologized and she was forgiving, and in fact
she turned out to be the kind of stranger who is open to conversation. Her
name was Bethenny, she told me. She was twenty-nine and ran a day care out
of her house (hence, the Cheerios). She was also studying to get a nursing
degree and raising her daughter, who was ten. Because she was so
forthcoming I thought I'd edge closer to the heart of the matter. Was she
married? I asked. No. Did she want to be? Kind of, she said, and spun me a
semiironic fantasy of a Ryan Reynolds look-alike swooping in on a white
horse, or maybe a white Chevy. Was there any mortal male who might qualify
for the role? I asked. "Well, there's Calvin," she said, meaning her
daughter's father. She looked over at her daughter and tossed her a
granola bar and they both laughed. "But Calvin would just mean one less
granola bar for the two of us."
Bethenny seemed to be struggling in the obvious ways. Later I saw her at
checkout, haggling over coupons. But she did not exactly read as the
pitiable single mother type. There was genuine pleasure in that laugh, a
hint of happy collusion in hoarding those granola bars for herself and her
daughter. Without saying as much, she communicated to me what her daughter
seemed already to understand and accept: By keeping Calvin at arm's
length, Bethenny could remain queen of her castle, and with one less mouth
to feed, they might both be better off.
How is it that the father of her only child had so little hold on her? How
could his worth be measured against the value of a snack? I got up the
courage to ask her if I could contact Calvin, and she readily gave me his
phone number. Over the next few months Calvin and I talked every few
weeks, me always trying to figure out how he had become so invisible. He
was a gentle, earnest type and hard not to like. He talked about all the
jobs he'd held and hated and I gave him advice, about work and other
important matters (such as how to operate the microwave at the 7-Eleven, a
source of constant frustration during his midafternoon food runs). I had
an idea that I might write a story about what was happening to guys like
Calvin in the post–manufacturing age, that Calvin might help me solve the
mystery of those missing men.
The terms "mancession" and "he-cession" featured prominently in headlines
that year, their efforts at cuteness meant to soften the painful reality
that the primary victims of our latest economic disaster had been men like
Calvin, the ordained breadwinners. If these men had already been laid low
by the recession of the 1990s, I wondered, where were they now, nearly
twenty years later, after this last series of blows? And how would they
find their way back? My hope was to stay in touch with Calvin long enough
that he would start earning enough money to pick up the grocery bill
again, that he would find his way home. Part of me kept imagining some
distant point in the future when, like in the old Ladies Home Journal "Can
This Marriage Be Saved?" series, Calvin and Bethenny would get back
together and forge a happy trio, and in the dramatic crescendo of any
imaginary reality series, the streets of the town would once again become
peopled with men.
 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
But as I spent time with Calvin and dug into the research, I discovered
that I had started with the wrong questions. Calvin and his friends were
not really trying to get back the lives they'd once had, because those
lives were no longer there to get back. I began to understand that
something seismic had shifted the economy and the culture, not only for
men but for women, and that both sexes were going to have to adjust to an
entirely new way of working and living and even falling in love. Calvin
was not going to drive up in a Chevy and take his rightful place at the
head of the table one day soon, because Bethenny was already occupying
that space, not to mention making the monthly payments on the mortgage,
the kitchen renovation, and her own used car. Bethenny was doing too much
but she was making it work, and she had her freedom. Why would she want to
give all that up?
The story was no longer about the depths men had sunk to; that dynamic had
been playing out for several decades and was more or less played out. The
new story was that women, for the first time in history, had in many ways
surpassed them. The Calvins and Bethennys — all of us — had reached the
end of two hundred thousand years of human history and the beginning of a
new era, and there was no going back. Once I opened my eyes to that
possibility, I realized that the evidence was everywhere, and it was only
centuries of habit and history that prevented everyone from seeing it.
With a lot more reporting and research, I was able to put a clear story
together. In the Great Recession, three-quarters of the 7. 5 million jobs
lost were lost by men. The worst-hit industries were overwhelmingly male,
and deeply identified with macho: construction, manufacturing, high
finance. Some of those jobs have come back, but the dislocation is neither
random nor temporary. The recession merely revealed — and accelerated — a
profound economic shift that has been going on for at least thirty years,
and in some respects even longer.
In 2009, for the first time in American history, the balance of the
workforce tipped toward women, who continue to occupy around half of the
nation's jobs. (The UK and several other countries reached tipping point a
year later.) Women worldwide dominate colleges and professional schools on
every continent except Africa. In the United States, for every two men who
will receive a BA this year, for example, three women will do the same. Of
the fifteen job categories projected to grow the most in the United States
over the next decade, twelve are occupied primarily by women. Indeed, the
US economy is becoming a kind of traveling sisterhood: Professional women
leave home and enter the workforce, creating domestic jobs for other women
to fill. Our vast and struggling middle class, where the disparities
between men and women are the greatest, is slowly turning into a
matriarchy, with men increasingly absent from the workforce and from home,
and women making all the decisions.
In the past, men derived their advantage largely from size and strength,
but the postindustrial economy is indifferent to brawn. A service and
information economy rewards precisely the opposite qualities — the ones
that can't be easily replaced by a machine. These attributes — social
intelligence, open communication, the ability to sit still and focus —
are, at a minimum, not predominantly the province of men. In fact, they
seem to come more easily to women. Women in poor parts of India are
learning English faster than men, to meet the demands of new global call
centers. Women own more than 40 percent of private businesses in China,
where a red Ferrari is the new status symbol for female entrepreneurs. In
2009, Icelanders made Johanna Sigurdardottir prime minister, electing the
world's first openly lesbian head of state. Sigurdardottir had campaigned
explicitly against the male elite she claimed had destroyed the nation's
banking system, vowing to end the "age of testosterone."
Economic changes can shift and warp the culture, and in some countries the
new breed of power women has landed as a shock. Japan is in a national
panic over "herbivores," the cohort of young men who are refusing to date
or have sex, and instead are spending their time gardening, organizing
dessert parties, and acting cartoonishly feminine. The power women they
are presumably too scared to date are known as "carnivores," or sometimes
"hunters." In Brazil, church-based groups known as "Men of Tears" have
proliferated to console the growing number of men whose wives make more
money than they do.
These changes have reached deep into the intimate lives of couples,
shifting the way men and women worldwide think about marriage, love, and
sex. In Asia, as women gain more economic power and retreat further from
the culture's long-standing ideal of a perfect wife, the average age of
marriage for women is thirty-two, and divorce in many Asian countries is
skyrocketing. The mismatch between tradition-minded men and
forward-marching women has given rise to an international market for
spouses, as men around the world seek out brides with values (for now)
more consonant with their own. In the West, meanwhile, women behave in
sexually aggressive ways that would have been unimaginable even twenty
years ago.
 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
In the United States, the relationship changes are playing out in vastly
different, almost opposite ways in different classes. This point almost
always gets confused, which is why I ended up writing two chapters on
marriage rather than one. Our nation is splitting into two divergent
societies, each with their own particular marriage patterns. One is made
up of the 30 percent of Americans who have a college degree and the other
is made up of everyone else — the poor, the working class, and what
sociologists are calling the "moderately educated middle," meaning high
school graduates who might have some technical training or college
experience but not a full degree. In this large second group, the rise of
women is associated with the slow erosion of marriage and even a growing
cynicism about love. As the women in this second group slowly improve
their lot, they raise the bar for what they want out of marriage — a Ryan
Reynolds look-alike, a white Chevy. But the men of their class are failing
to meet their standards. The men may cling to traditional ideals about
themselves as providers, but they are further than ever from being able to
embody those ideals. This is the class from which we draw our romantic
notions of manhood, which inspired generations of country music and
political speeches. But now the rising generation has come to think of
lasting love as a fiction that lives on only in those speeches and pop
songs.
Among the educated class, women's new economic power has produced a
renaissance of marriage. Couples in possession of college degrees are much
more fluid about who plays what role, who earns more money, and, to some
extent, who sings the lullabies. They have gone beyond equality and
invented whole new models of marriage. I call these "seesaw marriages,"
where the division of earnings might be forty-sixty or eighty-twenty — and
a year or two later may flip, giving each partner a shot at satisfaction.
More wives at the top are becoming the main breadwinners for some period
of time, and, as a result of this new freedom, more couples are describing
their marriages as "happy" or "very happy." But even "happy" can hide
complications. As I interviewed such couples, I realized that men, even if
they check the "happy" box, are not nearly so quick or eager to inhabit
these new flexible roles as women are.
In fact throughout my reporting, a certain imaginary comic book duo kept
presenting themselves to me: Plastic Woman and Cardboard Man. Plastic
Woman has during the last century performed superhuman feats of
flexibility. She has gone from barely working at all to working only until
she got married to working while married and then working with children,
even babies. If a space opens up for her to make more money than her
husband, she grabs it. If she is no longer required by ladylike standards
to restrain her temper, she starts a brawl at the bar. If she can get away
with staying unmarried and living as she pleases deep into her thirties,
she will do that too. And if the era calls for sexual adventurousness, she
is game. She is Napoleonic in her appetites. As she gobbles up new
territories she hangs on to the old, creating a whole new set of
existential dilemmas (too much work and too much domestic responsibility,
too much power and too much vulnerability, too much niceness and not
enough happiness). Studies that track women after they get their MBAs have
even uncovered a superbreed of Plastic Women: They earn more than single
women and just as much as the men. They are the women who have children
but choose to take no time off work. They are the mutant creature our
society now rewards the most — the one who can simultaneously handle the
old male and female responsibilities without missing a beat.
Cardboard Man, meanwhile, hardly changes at all. A century can go by and
his lifestyle and ambitions remain largely the same. There are many
professions that have gone from all-male to female, and almost none that
have gone the other way. For most of the century men derived their sense
of manliness from their work, or their role as head of the family. A
"coalminer" or "rigger" used to be a complete identity, connecting a man
to a long lineage of men. Implicit in the title was his role as anchor of
a domestic existence. Some decades into the twentieth century, those
obvious forms of social utility started to fade. Most men were no longer
doing physically demanding labor of the traditional kind, and if they
were, it was not a job for life. They were working in offices or not
working at all, and instead taking out their frustration on the microwave
at the 7-Eleven. And as fewer people got married, men were no longer
acting as domestic providers, either. They lost the old architecture of
manliness, but they have not replaced it with any obvious new one.
What's left now are the accessories, maybe the "mancessories" — jeans and
pickup trucks and designer switchblades, superheroes and thugs who rant
and rave on TV and, at the end of the season, fade back into obscurity.
This is what critic Susan Faludi in the late 1990s defined as the new
"ornamental masculinity," and it has not yet evolved into anything more
solid.
As a result men are stuck, or "fixed in cultural aspic," as critic Jessica
Grose puts it. They could move more quickly into new roles now open to
them — college graduate, nurse, teacher, full-time father — but for some
reason, they hesitate. Personality tests over the decades show men
tiptoeing into new territory, while women race into theirs. Men do a tiny
bit more housework and child care than they did forty years ago, while
women do vastly more paid work. The working mother is now the norm. The
stay-at-home father is still a front-page anomaly.
 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
The Bem test is the standard psychological tool used to rate people on how
strongly they conform to a variety of measures considered stereotypically
male or female: " self-reliant," "yielding," "helpful," "ambitious,"
"tender," "dominant." Since the test started being administered in the
mid-1970s, women have been encroaching into what the test rates as male
territory, stereotypically defining themselves as "assertive,"
"independent," "willing to take a stand." A typical Bem woman these days
is "compassionate" and "self – sufficient," "individualistic," and
"adaptable." Men, however, have not met them halfway, and are hardly more
likely to define themselves as "tender" or "gentle" than they were in
1974. In fact, by some measures men have been retreating into an
ever-narrower space, backing away from what were traditionally feminine
traits as women take over more masculine ones.
For a long time, evolutionary psychologists have attributed this rigidity
to our being ruled by adaptive imperatives from a distant past: Men are
faster and stronger and hardwired to fight for scarce resources, a trait
that shows up in contemporary life as a drive to either murder or win on
Wall Street. Women are more nurturing and compliant, suiting them
perfectly to raise children and create harmony among neighbors. This kind
of thinking frames our sense of the natural order.
But for women, it seems as if those fixed roles are more fungible than we
ever imagined. A more female-dominated society does not necessarily
translate into a soft feminine utopia. Women are becoming more aggressive
and even violent in ways we once thought were exclusively reserved for
men. This drive shows up in a new breed of female murderers, and also in a
rising class of young female "killers" on Wall Street. Whether the shift
can be attributed to women now being socialized differently, or whether
it's simply an artifact of our having misunderstood how women are
"hardwired" in the first place, is at this point unanswerable, and makes
no difference. Difficult as it is to conceive, the very rigid story we
believed about ourselves is obviously no longer true. There is no
"natural" order, only the way things are.
Lately we are starting to see how quickly an order we once considered
"natural" can be overturned. For nearly as long as civilization has
existed, patriarchy — enforced through the rights of the firstborn son —
has been the organizing principle, with few exceptions. Men in ancient
Greece tied off their left testicle in an effort to produce male heirs;
women have killed themselves (or been killed) for failing to bear sons. In
her iconic 1949 book The Second Sex, the French feminist Simone de
Beauvoir suggested that women so detested their own "feminine condition"
that they regarded their newborn daughters with irritation and disgust.
Now the centuries-old preference for sons is eroding — or even reversing.
"Women of our generation want daughters precisely because we like who we
are," breezes one woman in Cookie magazine.
In the 1970s, the biologist Ronald Ericsson came up with a way to separate
sperm carrying the male- producing Y chromosome from those carrying the X.
He sent the two kinds of sperm swimming down a glass tube through
ever-thicker albumin barriers. The sperm with the X chromosome had a
larger head and a longer tail, and so, he figured, they would get bogged
down in the viscous liquid. The sperm with the Y chromosome were leaner
and faster and could swim down to the bottom of the tube more efficiently.
The process, Ericsson said, was like "cutting out cattle at the gate." The
cattle left flailing behind the gate were of course the X's, which seemed
to please him.
Ericsson had grown up on a ranch in South Dakota, where he'd developed his
cowboy swagger and mode of talking. Instead of a lab coat, he wore cowboy
boots and a cowboy hat, and doled out his version of cowboy poetry. The
right prescription for life, he would say, was "breakfast at five thirty,
on the saddle by six, no room for Mr. Limp Wrist." In 1979, he loaned out
his ranch as the backdrop for the iconic Marlboro Country cigarette ads
because he believed in the campaign's central image — "a guy riding on his
horse along the river, no bureaucrats, no lawyers," he recalled when I
spoke to him. "He's the boss." He would sometimes demonstrate the sperm
selection process using cartilage from a bull's penis as a pointer. In the
late 1970s, he leased the method to clinics around the United States,
calling it the first scientifically proven method for choosing the sex of
a child.
Feminists of the era did not take kindly to the lab cowboy and his
sperminator. "You have to be concerned about the future of all women,"
said Roberta Steinbacher, a nun turned social psychologist, in a 1984
People profile of Ericsson. Given the "universal preference for sons," she
foresaw a dystopia of mass-produced boys that would lock women in to
second-class status while men continued to dominate positions of control
and influence. "I think women have to ask themselves, 'Where does this
stop?' “she said. "A lot of us wouldn't be here right now if these
practices had been in effect years ago."
 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
Ericsson laughed when I read him these quotes from his old antagonist.
Seldom has it been so easy to prove a dire prediction wrong. In the 1990s,
when Ericsson looked into the numbers for the two dozen or so clinics that
use his process, he discovered, to his surprise, that couples were
requesting more girls than boys. The gap has persisted, even though
Ericsson advertises the method as more effective for producing boys. In
some clinics, he has said, the ratio of preference is now as high as two
to one. Polling data on Americans' sex preference in offspring is sparse,
and does not show a clear preference for girls.
********************************* Did male dominance exist? Of course it
existed. But it seems to be gone now. And the era of the firstborn son is
totally gone."******************************
But the picture from the doctor's office unambiguously does. A newer
method for sperm selection, called Micro- Sort, is currently awaiting
clinical approval from the Food and Drug Administration. The girl requests
for that method run at about 75 percent. The women who call Ericsson's
clinic these days come right out and say, "I want a girl"; they no longer
beat around the bush. "These mothers look at their lives and think their
daughters will have a bright future their mother and grandmother didn't
have, brighter than their sons, even," says Ericsson, "so why wouldn't you
choose a girl?" He sighs and marks the passing of an era. "Did male
dominance exist? Of course it existed. But it seems to be gone now. And
the era of the firstborn son is totally gone."
Ericsson's extended family is as good an illustration of the rapidly
shifting landscape as any other. His twenty-seven-year-old granddaughter —
"tall, slender, brighter than hell, with a take-noprisoners personality" —
is a biochemist and works on genetic sequencing. His niece studied civil
engineering at the University of Southern California. His grandsons, he
says, are bright and handsome, but in school "their eyes glaze over. I
have to tell 'em: 'Just don't screw up and crash your pickup truck and get
some girl pregnant and ruin your life.' " Recently Ericsson joked with the
old boys at his elementary school reunion that he was going to have a
sexchange operation. "Women live longer than men. They do better in this
economy. More of 'em graduate from college. They go into space and do
everything men do, and sometimes they do it a whole lot better. I mean,
hell, get out of the way — these females are going to leave us males in
the dust."
 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
The shift is apparent not only in the United States, but in many of the
world's most advanced economies. For several centuries South Korea
constructed one of the most rigid patriarchies on the planet. Many wives
who failed to produce male heirs were abused and treated as domestic
servants; some families prayed to spirits to kill off girl children. Now
that preference for firstborn sons — or any sons — has vanished. Over the
last few years the government has conducted a national survey of future
parents, asking, "If you found out you were pregnant, what sex would you
want your child to be?" In 2010, 29. 1 percent of women said they
preferred a boy as their firstborn child, and 36. 3 percent said a girl
(the rest answered "no preference"). For men, the gap was even higher,
with only 23 percent choosing a boy and 42. 6 percent a girl. It took an
imaginary third child, after two hypothetical daughters, for people to say
they'd prefer a boy, and then by only a tiny margin.
From a feminist standpoint, the recent social, political, and economic
gains of women are always cast as a slow, arduous form of catch-up in the
continuing struggle for gender equality. But a much more radical shift
seems to have come about. Women are not just catching up anymore; they are
becoming the standard by which success is measured. "Why can't you be more
like your sister?" is a phrase that resonates with many parents of
school-age sons and daughters, even if they don't always say it out loud.
As parents imagine the pride of watching a child grow and develop and
succeed as an adult, it is more often a girl than a boy that they see in
their mind's eye.
Yes, the United States and many other countries still have a gender wage
gap. Yes, women still do most of the child care. And yes, the upper
reaches of power are still dominated by men. But given the sheer velocity
of the economic and other forces at work, these circumstances are much
more likely the last artifacts of a vanishing age rather than a permanent
configuration. Dozens of undergraduate women I interviewed for this book
assumed that they very well might be the ones working while their husbands
stayed at home, either minding the children or simply looking for work.
Guys, one college senior remarked to me, "are the new ball and chain." It
may be happening slowly and unevenly, but it's unmistakably happening: The
modern economy is becoming a place where women hold the cards.
In the year since I wrote the story in The Atlantic magazine story that
inspired this book, I have been called a radical feminist for trumpeting
women over men and an antifeminist for suggesting that the struggles are
over for women. I am neither of those things, but my findings do herald
both straightforward progress for women on some fronts and tremendous
headaches on others. Women like Bethenny — my friend from the town of
vanishing men — have a kind of ambiguous independence right now. They are
much less likely to be in abusive relationships, much more likely to make
all the decisions about their lives, but they are also much more likely to
be raising children alone. It's a heavy load. One reporting experience
that lingers with me is waking up a woman in the elevator at a community
college in Kansas City. Between floors one and four she had fallen asleep,
so hard had she been working to get her degree, hold down a night job, and
raise three kids.
Among the college-educated class, ambivalence comes in the form of excess
choice. Educated women take their time finding the perfect partner,
seeking out creative, rewarding jobs, and then come home and parent their
children with homeschooling intensity. Their lives are rich with
possibilities their mothers never dreamed of. And yet in most surveys
women these days are not more likely to rate themselves happier than women
did in the 1970s. Choice creates its own set of anxieties — new spheres to
compete in and judge yourself wanting, a constant fear that you might be
missing out.
Men today, especially young men, are in a transition moment. They no
longer want to live as their fathers did, marrying women they can't talk
to, working long hours day after day, coming home to pat their kids on the
head absentmindedly. They understand that the paternal white boss, like
the one on The Office, has now become a punch line. But they can't turn
away from all that because they fear how power and influence could be
funneled away from them: by wives who earn more money than they do, jobs
with less prestige, tedious Tuesday afternoons at the playground. There
are plenty of opportunities for men. Theoretically, they can be anything
these days: secretary, seamstress, PTA president. But moving into new
roles, and a new phase, requires certain traits: flexibility, hustle, and
an expansive sense of identity.
I started this book thinking that we were heading into a woman's world,
and that this world would reflect some set of "womanly values" as defined
by the Bem test — "tender," "yielding," "compassionate." But by the end of
my research I became less convinced that what has happened to women and
men reveals or is the result of any such fixed values or traits. Assuming
a world run by women is more "tender" seems to me, again, just a story we
tell ourselves to make the current massive upheavals in gender roles seem
tamer and more predictable, when they are anything but: more like
revolutionary, potentially exhilarating, and sometimes frightening, but
altogether inevitable. So the least we can do is to see them clearly.
Excerpted from The End of Men by Hanna Rosin. Copyright 2012 by Hanna
Rosin. Excerpted by permission of Riverhead Books.
http://www.womanthouartgod.com/escape_patriarchy.php
 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
All educated informed people who do internet today Zarchian realize that
it is mostly the US govt. that does all these "terrorist" acts - The govt.
did Oklahoma City bombing, the govt. created AIDS, Ebola, Sars, the govt.
is using biowarfare against humanity. I put some imp. links here, look
them up, there are many more...."Garden Plot" - They have concentration
camps ready with ovens over 2,500 degrees for us - they have underground &
overground concentration camps that can hold millions.....they are
training police to round up citizens, while citizens are screaming....what
is their purpose? Slavery of most of the human race, they cannot manage
all of us, they want to kill 80% of us, they started with the black people
in Africa, killing them with their invention AIDS, NOW THEY ARE TAKING
OVER THE LANDS OF THE PEOPLE THEY KILLED - IN AFRICA - They want to take
the 20% of humanity that is left, put them into cities micro chipped, use
them as work slaves....If any of them complains, CUT OFF THEIR MICROCHIP.
Then they cannot "buy or sell" get food or medical, do anything, they are
like dead people, might as well be dead - no one will help as it is like
Hitler's Germany, they will kill you if you help.....This is called
"conspiracy theories" except they are facts, not theories.......This is
PATRIARCHY - RULE BY THE FATHER. The Roman, Greek, Sparta times were no
better - when men rule WE HAVE HELL. THAT IS WHY THE MOST ADVANCED PEOPLE,
CALLED BY GOD, ARE ALL WORKING FOR MATRIARCHY - WOMAN IS THE ONLY HOPE.
THERE IS SO MUCH MORE....I HAVE HUNDREDS OF LINKS.
````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
THIS IS QUITE INTERESTING – THANK YOU WILLIAM BOND
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A MAN REFUSES TO HONOR THE GODDESS? ANSWER: DEATH – HE
DROWNS, AMAZING THE HIDDEN MEANING OF SOME LYRICS!
The Meaning of the Lyrics of "A Whiter Shade Of Pale"
http://wabond.hubpages.com/hub/A-Whiter-Shade-of-Goddess
There does seem to be a lot of confusion about what the words of the
popular song "A Whiter Shade of Pale" by Keith Reid mean. Anyway these are
the lyric for them.
We skipped the light fandango
turned cartwheels 'cross the floor
I was feeling kinda seasick
but the crowd called out for more
The room was humming harder
as the ceiling flew away
When we called out for another drink
the waiter brought a tray
The first verse simply describes a drunken party, but saying that, "the
ceiling flew away" suggests they were also taking hallucinogenic drugs as
well.
And so it was that later
as the miller told his tale
that her face, at first just ghostly,
turned a whiter shade of pale
In the chorus line, it is recognized by most people that the song's lyrics
were referring to "The Miller's Tale" in "Canterbury Tales" by Geoffrey
Chaucer written in the 14th century. This is an extremely crude story,
where two student lust after a carpenter's wife and one gets tricked into,
""kissed her naked arse full savorly". This behaviour is symbolic of a
extreme act of worship. A Goddess likewise would be expected to be
worshipped.
Then in the last line of the chorus we are told that, her face turned "A
whiter shade of pale". At the time these lyrics were written was a fairly
popular book called, "The White Goddess" by the poet Robert Graves. The
very fact that this mysterious woman had a ghostly white face suggests she
was the White Goddess as portrayed by Robert Graves. She hints at this in
the next two lines.
She said, 'There is no reason
and the truth is plain to see.'
But the narrator of these lyrics refuses to take the hint.
But I wandered through my playing cards
and would not let her be
In these two lines he shows he not only doesn't recognize her as a Goddess
but was also disrespectful of her as well.
one of sixteen vestal virgins
who were leaving for the coast
The references to Vestal Virgins is interesting, as they worshipped the
Goddess Vesta. This priestess order was older than the Roman Empire as it
seems that Rhea Silvia, the mother of Romulus and Remus, the founders of
Rome, was a Vestal Virgin. At the beginning of the Roman Empire the Vestal
Virgins held high status in Rome, as they were the " Keepers of the
Flame", and if it was to go out, then it was believed, Rome would fall.
But over the years their status was slowly undermined. Then when Rome
became Christianised, the Vestal Virgins were turned into nuns, and the
sacred flame was put out. Then true to the ancient prophecy, Rome started
to deteriorate through civil war and invasion and finally collapsed.
and although my eyes were open
they might have just as well've been closed
So even though again there was another hint at her Goddess status, the
narrator still refuses to recognize who she was.
She said, 'I'm home on shore leave,'
though in truth we were at sea
The fact they disagreed if they were on shore or at sea, might be about
there mental states, she felt safe and secure with her "feet on the
ground" but he was, "all at sea".
so I took her by the looking glass
and forced her to agree
Again he is very disrespectful and forces his opinions onto her.
saying, 'You must be the mermaid
who took Neptune for a ride.'
He is now willing to recognize her supernatural status by saying she is a
mythical mermaid but is still is not willing to see her as a Goddess.
But she smiled at me so sadly
that my anger straightway died
She is obviously trying to save him and was clearly sad, he was rejecting
her help.
If music be the food of love
then laughter is its queen
It seems he was still intoxicated and enjoying the party he was in.
and likewise if behind is in front
then dirt in truth is clean
The paradoxes in these two lines suggest he was unable to see the reality
of his situation, which was the opposite of what he thought it was.
My mouth by then like cardboard
seemed to slip straight through my head
He is now saying he has a hangover.
So we crash-dived straightway quickly
and attacked the ocean bed
These two lines suggest he was drowned. So the moral of the story is that
because he failed to recognize a Goddess who wanted save him and gave her
no respect, he was left to go down in his path of self destruction.
Robert Graves in his books would say this is true of the whole human race.
We once worshipped Goddesses and revered and respected women but with the
rise of male gods and patriarchy the human race is now on a course of
self-destruction.
..................................................................................................................
 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
Discussion with friends re. removing Patriarchal males like a cancer from
our society – a friend wishes she could get rid of them all in an instant:
Rasa says: the disease is PATRIARCHY - RULE BY THE FATHER, THE MAN....Many
of us are now in agreement it is a MAN THING, not a human thing, a woman
thing, A MAN THING.....The only answer is MATRIARCHY, WOMEN HAVE TO TAKE
OVER. Jane you are righteously in a rage - when one confront evil of this
magnitude, that is the feeling....But God does NOT GIVE US THE OPTION OF
ERADICATING PATRIARCHY, EVIL MEN, INSTANTLY, RIGHT NOW. Fantasizing about
it is one thing to do. You can imagine it, but it will not happen. What
does God give us the option of doing? Working at our full capacity, every
believer, the machinery of time moves on, slowly but surely, Female
Empowerment comes into being, ONE DEGREE AT A TIME, one enrichment of
female at a time, one failure of one male at a time, millions of males
failing to get their educational degrees, hundreds of thousands of men per
year committing suicide, women getting healthier, men getting
sicker........Men fail to take care of their health, women are learning
organic foods, health regimens, they take care of themselves, they go for
help when sick, they are stronger than men, they take less drugs &
alcohol, they love their lives, they are not destructive to themselves.
Besides being destructive to others, in general, males are also SELF
DESTRUCTIVE. Let them destroy themselves, their karma has arrived.
For those who are sincere in what they do, they work as much as they can,
one day at a time. It’s all research, writing, promulgating, spreading
the word, sharing information. This is what William Bond & I do almost
daily.
And we cannot do research on evil day in day out without it getting to us.
We have to have relief, by having fun, by pleasurable activities,
thoughts, feelings, otherwise you get “volunteer burn out” & you’re no use
to anyone, not even yourself. Jane, don’t get volunteer burn out, seek
relief from this work of exposing evil.
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
Kamakhya Shakti give us some long scripts with details these guys are
stupid...they learn from porno....all they talk about is butt
fukking....they are sick...please post some good long scripts with details
for these num nut porno addicted fools.....thank you....I am so busy doing
other things, you would help a lot if you did this....In fact, if you
could give them a script how to make love every day it would help heal
their porno sickness.......
.........................................................
PRAY AGAINST THE WORLD & ITS EVILS – PRAYER TO BRING ME BACK TO THE PLACE
OF MOTHER GOD, HER VALHALLA, THE ONLY ESCAPE IS TO GO, INWARD, THE
VALHALLA OF HEAVEN IS WITHIN, GO THERE PERIODICALLY TO ESCAPE MY FRIENDS,
BECAUSE THIS EVIL WORLD & THE PEOPLE IN IT – WILL MAKE YOU SICK,
DEPRESSED, BECAUSE THEY ARE SICK, SO THIS IS THE ESCAPE:
“Mother God, take me away from all the thoughts & the feelings that go
with them, of the world, the flesh, & people – of the devil. Life me up,
rise me up out of time & space, out of this temporary Hell / Purgatory,
into your reaches of Heaven.
Remove from me my attachment to people & things, to worry about finances,
insults, work to be done, disciplines, regimens, duties, all the shit of
this world that never ends & keeps beating on my door, my back & my brain.
Lift me up from all these thoughts, these connections; take me away from
PEOPLE, not only the bad but the good because you get entangled by both.
I cannot live in insult or consolation; I have to live in YOU.
Make me impervious to compliments / flattery, false attention as well as
insults & fake friends.....None of it is where I need to be, I must be in
TRUTH & TRUTH ALONE.
You are Truth, Mother God, make me impervious to people.
Make me impervious to the things of the world.
Make me impervious to be nobody or somebody in this world.
Make me impervious to all the nonsense & the temporary glory or shame of
this world.
Take away from me all thoughts, & feelings connected with these thoughts.
Lift me out of time & space, out of this world, my body, people & things.
I am praying this prayer several times a day, what a relief it gives me.”
GURU RASA 9 26 12
...................................................................................................
 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
SEEING MALES AS SEX OBJECTS – IS IT EVIL? IS IT THE SAME AS WHAT THEY
HAVE DONE TO US?
Guru Rasa says “No” – When They Look Upon Us That Way They Degrade Us, But
We Do Not Degrade Them
As long as males hold the power they look upon us as "sex objects." When
women hold the power, or they are emancipated, they will look upon men as
"sex objects." This is INEVITABLE Shahar.....The evil of what men did to
women & are still doing is that they DEGRADED US, humiliated us, deprived
us of civil liberties & human rights, turned us into things as they did
slaves or animals. To see someone as "sex object" or in a sexual way does
not have to be degrading & dehumanizing........People fail to see the
political subtleties here.....One can be attracted to the sexuality of
another without degrading them, insulting them, but just seeing them as
desirable. Men did not, do not do that to us, they purposefully have
injured as as in pornography - body punishing us, teaching young people
that vaginas have to be shaved, now teaching them to butt fukk
women.......If you do not see the difference here, it is too bad, because
there is a huge one........But about the group, if you read the intention,
it is for the Pleasure of Women & the education of men in giving us
pleasure. If this sounds bad to you, you are free to leave. My opinion of
your perspective is that it is rather Patriarchal. You have not yet
awakened to the true Feminist or Matriarchal Perspective, Female
Empowerment. That is not easy to do - awaken to this - because we have
been brainwashed for millennia, & it takes tremendous Light & effort to
break out of the brainwash, mind control.
......................................................................................
Shahar – I read a few pages of your “womanist” point of view but have not
yet gotten a good overview. You said you teach this? In a school or in a
casual sense? I take note this means that the black culture is different
than the white culture, & therefore its brand of “feminism” or “female
empowerment” has to be different.
Alright, that’s why I invited many black people to my Timeline & this
group – so I could hear their voices. I also joined their groups, but do
not have a total overview of what goes on there, either. I am studying.
You posted a kind of poem, “How to Love a Man, Really Love Him.” This was
a Patriarchal Manifesto of why we should take all the shit men give us &
keep loving them, like there is something lacking in us, they just need
more love. It was total Elephant sized bullcrap, because WE ALREADY LOVE
THEM TOO MUCH, WE NEED TO STOP, IT IS THEY WHO NEED TO LEARN TO LOVE US,
IT IS THEY WHO HAVE NO LOVE, THEY HAVE BEEN TAUGHT TO HATE US, THEY HAVE
TO BE RETRAINED, NOT US.
I would be happy to hear your brand of feminism & Female Empowerment from
the “womanist”, black point of view. Please explain it to us.
..............................................................................................
 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
Shahar you are on a fighting binge & want to argue with me over so many
things. OK no problem, I have a little time, we air out issues, it's
POSITIVE. Shahar we are not fools, we all know there are all kinds of men
& women out there, the good, the bad & the ugly. We know of Enlightened,
Spiritual men, we know of monsters. But speaking in general terms, the
blame does fall upon the shoulders of HUMAN MALES. This is borne out by
STATISTICS as to the MORAL BEHAVIOR OF MALES VS. FEMALE. Do you take us
for fools here? We have great men on my groups, there are no wicked ones
here that I know of. I have disciples here, William Sauer , Faith Love ,
Jonas Grazus & others. These men hold up my Matriarchal work, some have
not been able to do anything yet - but Faith Love is going to college to
be a Movie Producer & is going to produce a movie some day, on Matriarchy,
maybe MY LIFE. None of us here separates sex from spirit either, we are
EVOLVED, INTELLIGENT, EDUCATED, just like you. When I throw words around
like "idiot” you have to take it in the context of how I give it. Most
guys I am dating are to some degree "idiots" because they are VERY YOUNG,
& we are all stupid when we are young. All my friends know where I'm
coming from. It doesn't mean ALL MEN ARE IDIOTS. But most of the males
who are young that we date, can be called "idots" in a JOKING MANNER - &
in fact, my lady friends who are sharing all their man woes with me, who
are dating older men, are saying most or all of them are idiots also. I
guess the women who have the good guys aren't talking, as they have
nothing to complain about.
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
from Rasa...Hey Shahar
that's a great idea & I will take note from now on, but of course, they
rephrase it so you cannot recognize that the concept came from myself or
William Bond - William if you're out there, please affirm - what we have
been preaching, myself from 2004 on the internet - you from like 1998 -
Are not these academics now repeating those ideas in their own words?
Were we ALL ALONE for YEARS - now in like the last two years, more so last
year, they are POURING OUT ARTICLES & BOOKS THAT REITERATE WHAT WE HAVE
SAID.....How did it happen? Did we see the writing on the wall &
promulgate it ahead of them? Did they see our articles that I spammed,
for instance on 600 yahoo groups for five years! It took me 2 years just
to JOIN 600 groups! After I joined I spammed my articles nine hours a
day, one day a week, for a year. Then a web man built me a "speedy spam"
system that did in 20 mins. what previously had taken 9 hours.....I used
that system for another two years before it crashed - I had reached
millions with a thousand articles written by myself & William Bond.
Matriarchy took hold also when William was one of the first people ever,
to preach Matriarchy on You tube. William built nine lectures. I jumped
on & built 300 lectures, which got FOUR MILLION HITS IN ONE YEAR. Then
they deleted me, all was lost, but I reached millions for Matriarchy. One
lecture got over 400,000 hits. Don't anyone tell me I don't know
Matriarchy or William Bond doesn't know Matriarchy.
.......................................................................................................................................
 |
Rasa Von Werder is a photographer continuing her work for Matriarchy
through the IMAGES OF WOMEN. She portrays women as DOMINANT GODDESSES.
She taught her models/actors to ACT DOMINANT, pose in dominating ways,
behave dominantly toward men & think IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN SUPERIORITY
OVER MEN. She developed an arsenal of pictures of women which depict
women as glamorous, but powerful & intelligent, not fodder for men's
fetish needs, but independent of men's sexual gratification, portraying
themselves as Godlike, invincible & THEIR OWN FULFILLMENT IN THEMSELVES
Racial Issues
Guru Rasa Von Werder
BTW when I posted on the black group, an item about not leaving children
alone with men, this was POUNDING ALL MEN INTO THE GROUND? Pretty touchy,
considering the statistics, all I talked about were the statistics. But
it was not the man defiling me, & thereafter, he also defiled every friend
of mine that showed up - Ka Los - Amber Dawn & others -This same man was
nasty to you I saw......Why is he there allowed to shit on everyone? This
was a severely dikk-whipped group, why do you stay there? My friends were
outraged at the words that were spoken to me, I guess you must have liked
them, you agree with the other black women. I left because of the black
women who joined up with this man in the end. They are GANG RAPISTS. You
call me insensitive? I am extremely sensitive - ask my disciples &
friends, more sensitive than you can imagine. However, this is a WAR
going on. The war is men vs women, the battle of the sexes. I am
fighting a war, which males have won in the past & almost destroyed the
entire planet. Now we are gaining the planet back from them. Don't tell
me how to fight a war. Don't tell me to be SENSITIVE to the enemy that
wants to destroy all animals, all humans, & then himself. This is an
all-out destructive, Satanic Empire called Patriarchy - this is what I am
fighting - & to say that I have no EMPATHY or REFUSE TO UNDERSTAND the
plight of black people is totally wrong, when I am the one here & now
trying to build a bridge between mostly black women & white women
......Let me add this. I posted a series of issues & questions that
concerned black women....NOT ONE SINGLE WOMAN, BLACK OR WHITE, RESPONDED
TO THE ISSUES. One woman did post a positive sentence. But the two women
who had called me names the day before, jumped on to call me names again.
I told them it was about issues, if they could not address the issues,
shut up.....And yet, I am the villain here. How the Hell did I become the
villain? No other white woman dares even speak about this stuff because
they know they're gonna' get it. So they see I speak on it, & sure
enough, I am getting it, I am getting lambasted here on my own group for
trying to build bridges between black & white - I lack understanding,
empathy, I don't get where black women are coming from. Shahara for the
last time I ask you, where are black women coming from?
No comments:
Post a Comment