the Gender War

 

Dilemma – Paradox Women vs Men  10-14-23

William Bond & Rasa discussion

 

Hi Rasa

I suppose the 2084 book came out of my fears about governments and big business using modern technology to impose an authoritarian government onto us all. Which George Orwell warned us about in his book 1984. But it also occurred to me that modern technology takes away all the advantages that men have over women in gaining political power. 

 

So the book envisions a future where women become part of authoritarian governments throughout the world but don’t like what they are being told to do. So they organize themselves and take over and impose a Matriarchal government onto the world. As explained in the following excerpt in my book.     william

----------------- 

Excerpt from William’s new book:

“What do you mean, it was an inside job?” asked Walter. 

“All right, I’ll briefly try to explain what happened,” said Geoffrey. “As you know before the revolution we did have a world-wide totalitarian governments. These governments were controlled by billionaires, bankers and oligarchies who didn’t rule directly but preferred to bribe politicians to do their bidding. So these politicians where little more than puppets and PR people. Then over time the oligarchies discovered that female politicians were better in imposing oppressive and draconian laws onto the people than male politicians. This was because women did a better job of sugar coating these laws, so they didn’t seem as bad as they really were.”

 

“That still goes on today,” said Walter, “The present government is very good at sugar coating the draconian laws impose on us and pretending they are for our benefit.”

 

“Agreed,” said Geoffrey, “but even though these female politicians were good puppets and did as they were told, many didn’t like the what they were being asked to do. There were also an increasing number of female billionaires and they also disagreed with what was going on, as well. So they formed a secret female network that operated outside of the power of the ruling elite.”

 

“Yea, I did hear something about that,” said Walter.

 

“Then, as you know,” continued Geoffrey, “all the important oligarchies, bankers, billionaires and politicians had a big conference in Russia. The female leader of Russia, Yelizaveta Morozov then made a very bold and audacious decision to send in her troops and had them all arrested. She then released the female politicians and billionaires she thought she could trust. That gave female leaders all over the world the courage to arrest wealthy men in their own counties and confiscate their property and wealth.”

 

“But didn’t things start to go wrong?” asked Walter, “It nearly caused a world war and there was some sort of counter-revolution we don’t hear a lot about.”

 

“Yes, it wasn’t all plain sailing,” agreed Geoffrey, “the ruling elite of the time did fight back and there was unrest in many countries all over the world. But the harsh, draconian laws the oligarchies created to oppress the people, were then used against them. So the counter-revolutions were quickly crushed.”

 

“What you say does make more sense that the official story,” said Walter, “so why don’t they tell us more about what exactly happened.” 

“I think they are embarrassed by the fact that the female leaders before the revolution where little more than corrupt puppets.” said Geoffrey. “The irony is that it was the compliance of female politicians that put them into positions of power. Because the oligarchies thought they were easy to control. So they were shocked when female leaders suddenly turned against them, they never saw it coming.”

 

From Rasa: Your book sounds promising William.

  And eventually, this will happen.  Women are gaining power on all levels each generation.  Sometimes it seems so fast, other times dragging along, but it's moving in starts & fits.  There's always conflict on this earth, as you read history, it never ends.  One group asserts itself, there's a backlash.  I've been watching films from Great Britain the last couple days about their forests. 

 

There was the old 'Wildwood,' which no longer exists, but now we have the New Forest.  Much of the New Forest was planted with OAKS so they would have timber to build ships for war.  They knew if they just kept cutting down the hardwoods, eventually they would run out of trees as England has limited space.  Each ship takes 500k trees to build!

 

Some of these Oaks have lived 600 years!  And this struck me so typical, that men will do ANYTHING IT TAKES for war, but not for education or spirituality.  Their agenda, their foundation is WAR, WAR & more WAR.

 

It also cited how they would persecute the COMMONERS, who lived OFF THE WOODS by having their livestock - horses, cattle, pigs, etc, graze in the woods. Everyone needed the woods also for cooking & house warming. They controlled when the Commoners could do so, when they had to remove their animals.  They of course had declared the woods mostly to BELONG TO THE KING.  What else is new?

 

    Conflicts never end in Patriarchy & when we women try to rise up there is backlash - we have to be ready for it.  As advanced as we're supposed to be now, I can't go on these podcasts & start preaching what I believe full out - they will think I'm a looney bin - our ideas are so far ahead it sounds like 'another planet.'  Speaking of MATRIARCHY in this world right now sounds totally foreign & strange.  Anything but that.   Rasa

I agree Rasa in our patriarchal world, warfare is seen as being far more important that anything else. This is because men are fascinated by war and fighting and are more interested in this than anything else. But for soldiers to fight in wars they need to be disciplined so they learn to give total obedience to officers, so a general can use them like pawns on a chessboard in any battle. So if women take over they can use to the same methods the military use to train men, to learn to be totally obedient to women. 

 

The book I’ve written is a Femdom book and I have problems with Femdom because I claim that it would be a good idea if women rule the world because they are more caring people than men. But femdom fantasies want women to be cruel and sadistic. The way around this problem is to realised that men will not respect caring and loving women and see them as ‘weak’. So if women were to rule the world they have to use Machiavellian methods to dominate and control men.I explain this in my story through a speech by one of the characters I invented.    william

------------------------------ 

Excerpt from William’s New Book:

After they sat down they had to wait for about ten minutes until Mary turned up and stood on the stage. She then looked at the men in the hall and frowned. 

 

“It has been brought to my attention that you men have been talking about me and my companion during lunch,” she said, “Vince called both of us fucking bitches and claimed that all women are cruel and sadistic. I would refute that and tell you we women want more than anything to be kind, loving and caring of others. But what holds us back is you guys.”

 

She pointed to the audience with both her hands. 

 

“You’re all men,” continued Mary, “and a true macho man is both aggressive and competitive. So if we women were to nicely ask you to be kind to us and give us what we want, you would laugh at us and think we are weak. So through thousands of years of interacting with men, we have had to learn we have use masculine methods when dealing with men like you. And this is what is happening today. We are not being kind and caring towards you, because you would not respect us, if we were.”

 

She was waving her hands in a dramatic way to help emphasize her points. 

 

“We women know that when we try to be kind and caring towards men,” said Mary, “too many of you will exploit this for your own ends. Vince at lunch time complained how badly he had been treated but made no mention of the fantasies he enjoys of abusing women. And then he complains when we act out his fantasies, with him being abused in the same way he wants to abuse women. We women are fed up with being assaulted, raped and murdered by men. We know it won’t work if we nicely ask you all, to please don’t do this. What works, is to treat you like men and use masculine methods to make you respect us and give us what we want.”

 

She patted her upper chest as she said this.

 

“We have learned from men that, ‘might is right’,” continued Mary. “We have had to use Machiavellian methods to gain and hold power so that, ‘the ends justify the means’. Yes, women like me have had to learn to be cruel and sadistic bitches when dealing with men. The hard lesson we have learned is that we can only be kind and loving towards men when we have total control over them. Men are like dogs, if they are properly trained they can be loving pets but when they are not trained they will create chaos and be a danger to their owners. We know, none of you would respect us, unless we demonstrate we are able to be very cruel and sadistic to you. But we are also capable of being  kind and caring to you all, but for that to happen you all have to learn total obedience, to obey all women, at all times.”

 

Rasa says:  Ha ha ha.  If only this would go mainstream! 

 Well done.  You describe a dilemma & a paradox here.  Being nice to men makes them walk all over us.  We cannot control them that way to make them do what's right - the good men yes, but not the wicked ones, of which there are too many.

 

My belief as of late goes back to agree with an article you wrote long ago, which I was angry about.  You said women caused the problem we have with men!  Women permitted men to take over!  Was I mad!

 

But now I have come to this conclusion:  By choosing men for breeding that are the most macho, aggressive - they gave them to do all the DIRTY WORK, like slaughtering of animals, fighting to protect women & children, taking RISKS.  It seemed like a good idea at the beginning, but as time went on, the men became more & more macho, less & less empathetic & caring, & more aggressive.  A portion of them became ROGUE HUMANS.

 

At the same time, women became more & more passive as the work of aggression, having been taken over by men, they had the luxury of not doing 'the dirty work.'  They became less muscular, less aggressive....& the gap between men aggressive, women passive, widened.

 

And at a crucial point, part of the men rebelled & TURNED AGAINST WOMEN, wanting to be the leader, ruler & enforcer, & through their aggressive violence, they did just that & we have Patriarchy.

 

This is exemplified in the Myth of 'Lucifer turning into Satan' & one third of the angels following him.  I believe one third of the men became rogue men, except the problem is; many men who are NOT demonic are afraid of them & also follow.  The laws & culture are against nice, female-empowering men.

 

Meanwhile, the women have SACRIFICED their own aggression, machisma & leadership, - now they are sunk.  They must begin the long, arduous task of re-animating & ingesting again their own masculinity, in order to take back the world.  They cannot do so in the condition of passivity they are in. I for one can't get women to do anything against men - they are way too passive.

That is the dilemma & paradox, the passiveness of women.  How can they take back the world in this condition?  They can, slowly, very slowly, by reanimating their own aggressiveness & all that goes with it, once again.  And they should mate with the more passive men to create passivity in them where they will not dare resist or challenge the females.  Most men gain sex with women by somehow overpowering them, & these are not the nicest men, so you beget more men like that.   Rasa 

 

It is Rasa like the story of the mother Bear.

 Bears are a top predator and biggest danger mother bears face in protecting her cubs is male bears who will see her cubs as food. So she has to stand up and fight male bears who are bigger than her, to protect her cubs. So mother bears have a powerful maternal instinct but at the same time are very aggressive. Human females have to do the same, if they want to truly care for their children and make our world a better place for them, they have to stand up against men and fight them for power. 

 

It is true men are bigger, stronger and more aggressive than men but modern technology overcomes these problems. Women can use the power of technology to dominate and control men.    william 

Rasa:  You make a good point about technology.

  Women can use weapons like a handgun to stop men.  But it all starts with THE MIND.  Patriarchy has also BRAINWASHED women to think a certain way - this immobilizes them to use a weapon against a man.  And there is another sinister thing:  Men have formed laws which are enforced by men, or women also brainwashed.  These laws work against women, for men.  Women get punished much more for hurting men than do men for hurting women - & women know that & are afraid.

 

It is well known that when women took men to court for rape the men usually got away with it, & the woman's character got impeached, with the idea that she 'asked for it.'  So women are SLOW to use weapons against men.

 

They are overall AFRAID of the system of Patriarchy, which they know is against them.  And they no longer BELIEVE IN THEMSELVES.  This is what my book / New Religion is trying to square away:  "Woman Thou Art God" is a call to women to believe in themselves.

 

The female BODY BUILDING project also gave women a new idea of muscle development - it was all about confidence, standing up to men.  That was MY JOB & I did it.

 

So we begin with the mind - convincing women they are NOT inferior to men & they MUST have the COURAGE to stand on their own feet & to become leaders.   Rasa

 William says:  I agree Rasa,

 the problem is that women are very caring people which is the type of people we want ruling the world, but men are naturally very competitive. And the most aggressive and competitive men end up as leaders who will use every means available to gain wealth and power. So we find men who will use violence, cheating and deception to gain power. This is why many people think women can never rule the world, because they’re too nice. Which suggests that only the most ruthless and devious people can ever gain power and rule the world. And of course men use indoctrination to make women even more sacrificial than they normally are and make women feel guilty about putting their own needs first. 

 

Yet the bonobo ape shows us that it is possible for women to take over. The bonobo is closely related to chimpanzee as are able to breed together. But apart from humans the male chimpanzee are the most viscous and nasty males in the ape world. Yet bonobo females have successfully taken over  and dominate the males and they use sex and sisterhood to do this. But also they put the needs of their young and other female before the needs of the males. 

 

For instance it has been observed if bonobo females and males find food together the females feed first and only allow the males to feed after they have had what they want. I doubt if human females would do the same. So bonobo females are selfish when it comes to relating to male but overall the bonobo community are a far more caring and loving than any chimpanzee community. So human females have to learn from bonobo females how to take over and rule the world.   William 

Rasa says:  Bonobos vs human females:

  No, human females always defer to the male, in my lifetime.  If there's a group of 10 people - one of them male - & a vote is taken for leader, the women will vote for the male.  It used to make me want to vomit.  Which means they BELIEVE in male authority & not that any sister could be equal or more fitting for the position.

 

    Bonobos are the closest species to us & what we SHOULD be.  We can take them as an example.  Chimpanzees, which are almost exactly like Bonobos except they are Patriarchal, evolved on one side of a river while the Bonobos on the other.  Chimps, when they grow up - the males in particular, perhaps not the females - are BRUTAL & DANGEROUS. {I heard of a case where a man who brought them food all the time, on their island, he in his rowboat, wanted to see their new baby.  The male attacked & would have killed him had not the females stopped him.}.  Pet chimps have rages where they will attack a human & bite off their nose, ears, fingers - anything that sticks out.  One woman was bringing birthday food to her friend's pet chimp - he was in the yard.  He attacked her so ferociously he took off her face & blinded her.  The owner even shot him with a hand gun & he kept attacking.  Only the police could stop him.

 

And in their community the male 'leader' has a fanatical need to control the females.  One mother wandered off with her baby, purposely no longer wanted to be in their fold.  The males saw her - they are always reporting to the leader.  They got her, dragged her back, & beat her within an inch of her life.  The males routinely attack the females for standing up to them.  Sound like men?  When I have spoken up on the internet I have had my life threatened several times.  In person I have also been beaten, raped & intimidated, & threatened with violence for defying men.  You don't see women threatening men with assault too often,

 

    I saw a scene last night in 'Oliver Twist' where the 'Beagle' {male head of the workhouse} has a new wife, {female head of the workhouse} who he is talking back to.  He says men have their prerogatives, they will do what they wish.  He puts on his hat & heads for the door.  Suddenly something being thrown strikes him in the head, & someone holding some kind of implement is beating on him until he falls back in his chair.  His wife tells him what to do then or else he'll get more, & he timidly agrees.  This is highly unusual but I recommend women get the gumption to do as she did - assuming he's not a murderer like the same movie, a ruffian kills his mate Nancy.

 

    Bonobos are the only animal I know that sometimes has sex from the front.  And females do solve all issues by affection, friendliness & rubbing each other.  Not saying it works 100%.  Some young males are stubborn.  Human females also use sex a lot but unfortunately it doesn't make them leaders, only highly paid whores {when this works on the higher social status}.  There has to be another facet - that of Sisterhood.  It is the one thing they refuse to do, honor their sisters.  Brainwashing.  Self hate.  Self deprecation.  If you don't think highly of yourself within your Soul {not just your body} how can you look up to your sister?  The former slaves think the same way.  A black lady friend of mine used to own a legitimate massage parlor.  But she could not get the black neighborhood to recognize it until she got a WHITE DOCTOR to be it's titular head.  Then they came.  So sad.  She explained it to me - black people do not honor & respect one another {did you see the maid telling off Sidney Poitier in 'Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?'  She tells him he's putting on airs but underneath he's a phony & a clown, she can see through his fakery}..... - she said - same deal with women & their sisters.

 

    I can't get women to believe me, that men, in general, are their ENEMIES.  They cannot get over wanting to please men to get things out of them, they will climb over their sister to get to the top.  Men are NICE to you as long as you are COMPLIANT, that you pose no threat to the male supremacy.  Start talking about the issues, the truth, what males have done & do to women - & they go ape shit.  They will take revenge, even the 'ordinary' guys rather than leaders.  I know because they've done it to me.  These are the non-leadership guys who comply with the system for its benefits.  Yes, they obey the tyrant on top & his agenda, the system of male domination.  It gives them points, it gives them money & freedom.  Of course this is changing but agonizingly slow, yet in some ways, astronomically fast.  Education & jobs have remarkable statistics pro women.   Rasa