Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
ENTIRE WEEK. Rasa preparing to do a new book on him: “When God Was a
Penis.” Letter to Fitzgerald:
I had a vision this morning of what I am going to do with Ur erotic
(hardon) shots - It has given me peace of mind.
I will do a book on the ancient religion, 22,000 years old where they
worshiped God as a woman & also as a man. U will represent the masculine
part of the religion. Shaktis, in the religion called Shaktiism or
"Tantra" Sex, worship the body parts - the breasts, the vagina, & the
penis. In the penis area they build a statue called the LINGHAM & call it
lingham worship. It's sacred, like all the other facets of the religion,
they worship God by looking @ this statue of the penis, it's NOT A JOKE.
The statues are big hardon ones, like 4-5-6 feet long.
What better model to represent the living penis, the living lingham of God
than you, Fitzgerald? You are beautiful and there is no one with a
bigger, more beautiful penis than you.
What the men have done with you and your penis is they have degraded you
by having you as the fantasy for low-minded sex. There is no God in what
they do, their concept of your penis is low-minded, restricted to physical
pleasure and release, there is no spiritual love in it.
This will be remedied by me, when I present you as the Image of God, the
embodiment of God as a man. Now your hardon will have great meaning,
sacredness and spiritual beauty in the eyes of those who understand.
I feel ecstatic that I got this vision. Prior to that I was not sure how
to use your erotic shots.
The fashion, fitness and artistic shots of course, can be used everywhere
and anywhere by you and me, it will also be a welcome change for you, as
you will be fully dressed, with dignity and class, not advertising your
sexuality constantly for low-minded morons.
The name of the book: WHEN GOD WAS A PENIS
Google: Lingam worship, Shaktiism, worship of God through the body,
ancient tantra or tantric worship, penis worshiped as God.
Articles in this Issue:
HOW TO WORSHIP A WOMAN
THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT ...... PAEDOPHILES EVERYWHERE
MOUNTAIN GORILLAS SAVE THEMSELVES FROM SNARES!
Secret Government Documents Reveal Vaccines to be a Total Hoax
How Circumcision Hurts Women & Men
SHAVING PUBIC HAIR IS A RESULT OF PORNOGRAPHY—INJURIES FROM IT ESCALATING
THE WARS OF PATRIARCHY EXPLAINED
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
THE NEW WORLD ORDER, OLD WORLD ORDER
WARS OF MEN
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-real-new-world-order-bankers-taking-over-the-world/5322085
How quickly best laid plans become passé. New world orders come, it seems,
as frequently as eclipses.
The old world order (ancien régime), along with 16 million people, died
during the Great European War which began on June 28, 1914 when the
Austrian heir to the throne, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, was assassinated by
a Serb nationalist, Gavrilo Princip, in Sarajevo. (Today he would be
called a terrorist.) This assassination sent nations that had no desire to
go to war into the most destructive war the world had yet experienced.
Europe at the beginning of 1914 consisted of six major empires and an
assortment of minor states that the major empires didn’t care much about.
The six major empires, (the Austro-Hungarian, French, German, British,
Ottoman, and Russian) were ensnared in military alliances (much like the
US is today) which were formed to keep the peace. The diplomats, like
those today, believed that forming alliances that balanced the powers of
different groups would keep them from attacking each other. The Central
Powers consisted of Austro-Hungary, Germany, and the Ottoman Empire; the
Triple Entente consisted of the other three. Peace, the diplomats thought
was assured. What happened?
When the archduke was assassinated, the Austrians, confident in their
military prowess (as Americans are today), decided to punish Serbia which
was attacked on July 28. But the Serbs ambushed the Austrians at the
battles of Cer and Kolubara. The Austrians were thrown back with heavy
losses. Russia came to the aid of its ethnically related Serbs, and
Germany invaded France through Belgium and Luxembourg. Britain came to the
defense of France and the Ottoman Empire joined the war in the Balkans on
the side of the Central Powers. The alliances that were to ensure the
peace changed a single assassination into a massive war. When it was over,
the Austro-Hungarian, the German, the Ottoman, and the Russian Empires had
vanished and the United States, which joined the war late on the side of
the Triple Entente had become a world player. The old world order was
gone!
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
Woodrow Wilson, the American President, sought to create a new old world
order by proposing his Fourteen Points. Wilson wanted to create separate
nations out of former colonies and ensure the peace by creating a League
of Nations (another peace by treaty scheme). Territorial reductions were
made to Germany and Austria, a slew of new and revived nations were
created in Eastern Europe, while France and Britain carved up the Ottoman
Empire to suit themselves. The new old world order was just a reconfigured
old world order. It didn’t last and it didn’t ensure the peace. So much
for the best laid plans of diplomats.
Germany was reborn in 1933 when Adolph Hitler became Chancellor. He, too,
sought to create a new world order, one dominated by a Thousand Year Reich
(Empire). To that end, his policies were aimed at seizing Lebensraum
(living space) for the German people by extending Germany’s borders.
Austria and parts of Czechoslovakia were annexed and Poland was invaded.
But alas, Poland had a mutual defense treaty (another alliance formed to
ensure the peach) with Great Britain and France, so the invasion of Poland
started World War II.
When it was over, Germany again was destroyed and Great Britain and
France, for the most part, had had their empires diminished. The United
States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (Russia) found
themselves at the top of another new old world order.
The victorious powers, the US, the USSR, China, Great Britain, and France
tried again to ensure the peace by creating the United Nations which they
attempted to keep firmly in their control by making themselves rulers of
the Security Council which had a veto on all UN Activities all five
nations didn’t give unanimous approval to. That was to be the new old
world order. But it began to come unglued immediately. China was not
represented by mainland China which had become Communist but by
“Nationalist” China whose government had fled to Taiwan. Communist China
soon took the Chinese seat and the two Communist nations formed a bloc
while the remaining three Capitalist nations formed another. The United
Nations became the Disunited Nations and has remained so to this day. This
new old world order was stillborn.
Sometime after 1950 (because of secrecy, the exact date is unknown) the
Bilderbergers, realizing that the old world ancient régime and all of
these new old world orders were founded on nation states that kept going
to war with each other, began an attempt to create a truly new world
order. David Rockefeller writes,
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine
and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings
and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. . . .
It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if
we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But,
the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world
government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and
world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination
practiced in past centuries.”
“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the
political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my
encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate
influence they claim we wield over American political and economic
institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working
against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family
and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the
world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure –
one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am
proud of it”
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
If there were no nation states, no wars could erupt between them!
Some believe that these international bankers have succeeded in taking
over the world, but it has never succeeded in abolishing nation states. In
fact, there is some evidence that nation states may be disintegrating into
smaller ones. Scotland is going to hold a referendum on withdrawing from
England, Catalonia is talking about withdrawing from Spain, Czechoslovakia
has broken up into the Czech and Slovak republics, there is talk again of
secession in the US, and no one quite knows what is really happening in
the Arab world. A new world order ruled by one government? Not hardly!
But things began to break down in the 1950s. Until then, wars were fought
between armies supported by nation states, and their endings were
foreseeable. A war ended when one army, either voluntarily or on command,
surrendered. That era appears to have ended. Old world order warfare
appears to have become passé.
When the second world war ended, the Korean Peninsula was partitioned into
Northern and Southern sections occupied by the Russians and Americans
respectively. Elections for unification were to be held in 1948 but were
not; the Americans were unsure the result would favor the South. Open
warfare broke out when North Korean forces invaded South Korea in June,
1950. Because the Soviet Union was boycotting the United Nations Security
Council at the time, the United States and other countries passed a
Security Council resolution authorizing military intervention. The war’s
progress favored each side from time to time and continued until July,
1953 when an armistice was signed. Officially, the war still goes on
today. The US provided 88% of the 341,000 international soldiers which
aided South Korea. The Russians and the People’s Republic of China aided
North Korea. The West’s army was international, and the era of never
ending, wars may have begun.
After a short pause, the American hubris led the US to play one-upmanship
with France. Since the end of World War II, the French had been trying to
maintain its hold on its Southeastern Asian colony of Vietnam. But at the
Battle of Dien Bien Phu, the French were soundly defeated and decided to
give up the fight. American hubris about its military prowess made
American diplomats believe that the US could do what the French could not
and began to use American military resources to keep South Vietnam from
being united with the North.
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
The Pentagon’s military minds viewed this conflict as a traditional
two-nation-state one and believed that America’s military only had to
defeat a primitive North Vietnamese army to succeed. They were wrong, and
after twenty years of fighting, 58,000 Americans, millions of Vietnamese
had died, and the Americans fled. But this war marked another first: the
army that won all the battles lost the war. That had never before happened
in history. Today, winning battles does not win wars. Truly a new era in
warfare has begun. What the Pentagon’s commanders failed to realize was
that the war was not a two state war. It was a war between an invading
army and an indigenous people who could only be defeated by total
annihilation. No possible way existed for Americans (or any other
nation-state) to “win” this war.
But Americans are hard learners and they learned nothing from Korea and
Vietnam, so after two misadventures that appeared to be successful
(Grenada and the 1st Gulf War), the US led another multinational force
into Iraq and Afghanistan. After eight years in Iraq and the installation
of a new government, the US withdrew without achieving its goals, leaving
Iraq in disarray. And after more than a decade in Afghanistan a similar
outcome seems to be imminent. Like Vietnam, these wars too are not
two-state wars.
They amount to invading armies battling indigenous peoples who themselves
are not united and not under the control of any government, group, or
commander. No surrendering army in either country will ever be found. But
now there’s a new twist. The forces facing the invaders do not merely
consist of local peoples. Those peoples are assisted by non-state but
similarly minded multi-state actors. The people opposing the West in
Afghanistan are the same groups opposing the West in Libya, Algeria,
Syria, Yemen, Mali, Somalia, the Sudan, and elsewhere. People who have
been subjugated and exploited by the West have begun an undeclared war on
the West and westerners everywhere, and winning this war will require not
their defeat but their annihilation. The West cannot do that without
annihilating itself in the process.
The real new world order has emerged–the world’s downtrodden against the
West and its puppet, surrogate colonial governments. These non-state but
similarly minded actors will determine the course of future world history.
There is now a new world order that the West cannot control, that military
force cannot subdue, and that concessions cannot placate. Ancien régimes
relied on military power to influence events. The true new world order
renders military power effete. All it can now accomplish is kill for
killing’s sake. Pure barbarity is what the promise of Western Civilization
has been reduced to. What a wonderful world we have made!
.....................................................................................................
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
HOW TO WORSHIP A WOMAN
“So, friends, here it is. The short guide on how to worship a woman, and
why it's the wisest thing that a man can do. First of all, lets pop a few
very understandable doubts that you might have. I'm familiar with all of
them.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arjuna-ardagh/goddess-worship_b_660896.html
A few days ago, after a particularly exquisite evening with my wife
Chameli, I put this post up on Facebook before going to bed:
"I have had many, many great teachers in my life. A super abundance. No
one and nothing comes close to the woman who is now asleep in the bedroom.
My marriage has become the guru, the salvation, the muse, the crack
through which the divine shines through."
When I woke up the next morning, there were the usual offerings of people
who liked the post as well as comments. One man had the vulnerability and
courage to post this on facebook:
"Thank you Arjuna for this sharing, I feel like [I'm] in front of a choice
which is between feeling envious of what you have and I don't, or instead
to decide that 'I want that too,' and, as you show, it is possible..."
I was touched.
Over the next days, I got several more messages like this from men:
vulnerable men, honest men, rare and courageous men. They came in as
private messages on Facebook or through our website, and they all said
basically the same thing:
"I read your Facebook post. I want what you have. Show me how to get it."
So, friends, here it is. The short guide on how to worship a woman, and
why it's the wisest thing that a man can do. First of all, lets pop a few
very understandable doubts that you might have. I'm familiar with all of
them.
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
1. "I'm wounded and damaged in my relationships to the feminine."
So am I, dear brother, so am I. My parents divorced in a messy way when I
was four. I grew up alone with my mother. She did her very best to provide
for me, but she was unhappy and insecure. By the time I started to have
relationships with women myself in my early teens, I discovered that I had
a mountain of resentments, fears, and separation in my relation to the
feminine. The conscious practice of worship can become a part of healing
the wounds.
2. "Arjuna, you're lucky. You've got an incredible partner. I'm together
with a woman who's not like Chameli."
I really don't have the ultimate answer to that doubt or question. It
certainly could seem to be the case that I've been lucky in finding a
great woman, but here's how it happened for me. I've had a lot of less
lucky connections in my life. I've experienced my share of the
manipulative side of the feminine: the victim, the rageful, the vengeful.
And I have seen the ugly side of the masculine psyche in myself. A few
weeks prior to meeting Chameli, my wife, something deep and profound
shifted in me, which I believe can shift for anyone in the same way.
3. "I don't have a partner at all, and I sometimes doubt if I'll ever meet
anybody."
Being with a partner where worship is not flowing, or not being with a
partner at all, are basically two aspects of the same situation: you've
had an intuition or a glimpse of the possibilities of a deeper love, and
you want more of it. The solutions are the same.
4. "I feel my heart is closed down. I live in my head a lot, and I
wouldn't even know what worship was if it broke into my house at 2 o'clock
in the morning and held me at gunpoint."
That's where the whole thing starts for all of us, when we realize that we
don't yet know how to love. And that's that the big question that you have
to consider: "Is that okay with me?" Never mind how much money you make,
or how many friends you have on Facebook, no matter how nice a house you
live in, or no matter how big a car you drive, no matter how impressive
your partner's bust size, or how much you meditate and become spiritual...
have you loved for real, in a total and undefended way? If not, and here's
where you have to be honest with yourself, is that OK with you? Is it OK
to die one day without the heart's gift having been fully given?
Eight or nine years ago, I came to that question in myself, exactly that,
and I discovered that the answer was, if I was was raw and vulnerable and
uncomplicated, that it was actually not OK. If I died one day without
having fully loved, it would not have truly been a life well lived.
Many many years ago, I went to Bali for a vacation, on my own. I met up
with some other young travelers there and we hired a Jeep to take us on a
tour of the island. We drove up right to the highest point of the island,
where Tourists don't usually go. Our guide took us to one of the most
sacred temples. It was surrounded by a big brick wall with an ornate
entrance. After removing our shoes and wrapping scarves around our heads,
we stepped together through this entrance. Inside, there was a short
courtyard and then another brick wall with another entrance. After more
preparations of lighting incense and giving offerings, we stepped through
the second entrance. We were allowed to go through the opening in one more
wall, but that was it. All together there were ten walls around the deity
in the middle. Hindus could go beyond the fourth wall. Devotees of that
particular deity could go beyond the fifth wall, and so it went on. The
only people allowed to approach the deity directly were those who had
given their lives completely and totally to its worship. Everyone else
could come a little closer, a little closer, to the innermost beauty, but
not all the way to the center.
I'm not a big believer of the worship of statues, but there's a beautiful
symbolism to what I saw there, because a woman's heart is just like that.
At the essence of every woman's heart is the divine feminine. It contains
everything that has ever been beautiful, or lovely, or inspiring, in any
woman, anywhere, at any time. The very essence of every woman's heart is
the peak of wisdom, the peak of inspiration, the peak of sexual
desirability, the peak of soothing, healing love. The peak of everything.
But it's protected, for good reason, by a series of concentric walls. To
move inwardly from one wall to the next requires that you intensify your
capacity to devotion, and as you do so, you are rewarded with Grace. This
is not something you can negotiate verbally with a woman. She doesn't even
know consciously how to open those gates herself. They are opened
magically and invisibly by the keys of worship.
If you stand on the outside of the outermost wall, all you have available
to you, like many other unfortunate men, is pornography. For $1.99 a
minute, you can see her breasts, maybe her vagina, and you can stimulate
yourself in a sad longing for deeper love.
Step through another gate, and she will show you her outer gift-wrapping.
She'll look at you with a certain twinkle in her eye. She'll answer your
questions coyly. She'll give you just the faintest hint that there is more
available.
Step through another gate with your commitment, with your attention, with
the small seedlings of devotion, and she'll open her heart to you more.
She'll share with you her insecurities, the way that she's been hurt, her
deepest longings. Some men will back away at this point. They realize that
the price they must pay to go deeper is more than they are willing to
give. They start to feel a responsibility. But for those few who step
though another gate, they come to discover her loyalty, her willingness to
stick with you no matter what, her willingness to raise your children,
stick up for you in conversation, and, if you are lucky, even pick up your
dirty socks now and then. And so it goes on. You've got the gist by now.
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
Somewhere around the second wall from the center, she casts the veils of
her personality aside, and shows you that she is both a human being and
also a portal into something much greater than that. She shows you a wrath
that is not hers, but all women's. She shows you a patience that is also
universal. She shows you her wisdom. At this point you start to experience
the archetypes of women, who have been portrayed as goddesses and
mythological figures in every tradition.
Then, at the very center, in the innermost temple itself, all the layers
of your devotion are flooded with reward all at once. You discover the
very essence of the feminine, and in a strange way that is not exactly
romantic, but profoundly sacred all the same, you realize that you could
have got here with any woman if you had just been willing to pass through
all the layers of initiation. Any woman is every woman, and every woman is
any woman at the same time. When you love a woman completely, at the very
essence of her being, this is the one divine feminine flame. It is what
has made every woman in history beautiful. It's the flame behind the Mona
Lisa, and Dante's Beatrice, and yes, also Penelope Cruz and Heidi Klum.
You discover the magic ingredient which has lead every man to fall in love
with a woman.
When you learn how to pay attention to the essence of the feminine in this
way, you fall to the floor in full body prostration, tears soaking your
cheeks and clothes, and you wonder how you could have ever taken Her, in
all of Her forms, for granted even for a second.
So just a couple small questions remain. First, do you get what I'm
talking about? Does it jive for you? Does it make sense? And second, if
yes, how are you going to get from where you are now to being able to the
full capacity of your heart to love for real? I'd be glad to share more
about this if we get to know each other better, but here's how you get
started.
First, do what I did, and create an altar in your room dedicated to Divine
Feminine. Put only symbols of the feminine on it. I have a painting called
"Beatrix" by Dante Gabriel Rossetti. I have a statue of Quan Kin. Populate
your altar with anything that reminds you of the feminine, and spend a few
minutes of the day in worship. Yes, worship. Adoration. Devotion. Offer up
rose petals. Offer poems. Offer everything, and beg Her to reveal Her
innermost essence to you. This will work miracles whether you're single
and waiting to meet the right woman or whether you're already in
relationship and long to meet your woman in a deeper way.
The second way to get started: make a practice, a discipline, of telling
your woman, or any woman, ten times a day something which you adore about
her. "I love the smell of your shampoo." "I love the way you laugh." "The
color of your eyes is so beautiful." Of course, you need to keep it
appropriate. You can go as far out on a limb as you like if you're in
relationship with a woman, but with anyone else remember the gates. Keep
you communication appropriate to the gate number that you find yourself
at. Appreciation the curve of a woman's breast, for example, if she
happens to be the cashier at the supermarket, would equate more to
harassment than worship.
...........................................................................................................
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
Pubic Hair Grooming Injuries Increased Over Past Decade, Study Finds
RASA SAYS: SHAVING PUBIC HAIR IS A RESULT OF PORNOGRAPHY---MALE DOMINATION
TEACHINGS RE. SEX......THEY WANT U TO SEE THE PENIS GOING INTO THE VAGINA,
BEING HAIRLESS MAKES IT EASIER, IT THEN WENT TO GUYS---EASIER ALSO TO SEE
PENIS WITHOUT HAIR.....THE LACK OF HAIR ALSO MAKES THE WOMAN SEEM MORE
ADOLESCENT, AS OBVIOUSLY HAIR COMES WITH PUBERTY---SO BEING HAIRLESS MAKES
U LOOK LIKE A CHILD---MEN LIKE THE IDEA OF US BEING HELPLESS, SMALL, WEAK
LIKE A CHILD, THEN RAPING US. HAIRLESSNESS IS A FAD THAT HAS ILL ROOTS. NO
ONE WAS SHAVING PUBIC HAIR UNTIL PORN BECAME PERVASIVE.
Ladies and gentlemen, please be careful if you're grooming down there.
A new study in the journal Urology shows that genitourinary injuries have
increased by five times over the past decade due to grooming-related
reasons.
NBC News first reported on the study, conducted by University of
California, San Francisco researchers, which showed that pubic hair
grooming injuries increased by 247 incidents each year between 2002 and
2010. NBC News reported that by 2010, there were 2,500 incidents a year.
Most of the injuries involved razors -- 83 percent -- and the most common
injury type was laceration -- 36.6 percent. "External female genitalia"
was the most commonly injured part of the genitourinary area, according to
the study. And, researchers found that the injuries weren't only -- or
even mostly -- in women. In fact, only 56.7 percent of those presenting
with the injuries were women, the study said.
In 2009, the state of New Jersey considered (but ultimately decided
against approving) a proposal that would have banned bikini waxing after
two women became infected after getting Brazilian waxes and even had to be
hospitalized, USA Today reported.
And while it may be in vogue to shave -- or wax, or thread -- it all off
down there, pubic hair does serve a purpose. Dr. Emily Gibson wrote on
MedPage Today's KevinMD.com that when pubic hair is removed, tiny little
wounds result that could become breeding grounds for bacteria. Plus, the
irritation that comes from removing the hair could lead to irritation and
inflammation. Gibson writes:
Pubic hair does have a purpose, providing cushion against friction
that can cause skin abrasion and injury, protection from bacteria and
other unwanted pathogens, and is the visible result of long awaited
adolescent hormones, certainly nothing to be ashamed of or embarrassed
about.
RASA SAYS: GROW UR HAIR BACK IN, FORGET PORNOGRAPHY, IT IS EVIL, A TOOL
OF SATAN/MALE DOMINATION / PATRIARCHY. SATAN WANTS U TO BE HAIRLESS.
..............................................................................................
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
1 6 13 Rasa News
How Circumcision Hurts Women & Men
http://www.circumcision.org/harmswomen.htm
How Male Circumcision Harms Women
Ronald Goldman, Ph.D.
Learn about the hidden negative psychological and sexual effects of
circumcision and how these effects harm women in relationships with men.
This article is based on research reports in the medical and psychological
literature.
Marilyn Milos didn't know much about circumcision when she consented to
have her three sons circumcised. She trusted her doctor who told her it
did not hurt and "only took a moment." Several years later she watched a
circumcision in nursing school. "We students filed into the newborn
nursery to find a baby strapped spread-eagle to a plastic board on a
counter top across the room." Then the doctor arrived. "The silence was
soon broken by a piercing scream, the baby's reaction to having his
foreskin pinched and crushed as the doctor attached the clamp to his
penis. The shriek intensified when the doctor inserted an instrument
between the foreskin and the glans (head of the penis), tearing the two
[normally attached] structures apart. The baby started shaking his head
back and forth, the only part of his body free to move, as the doctor used
another clamp to crush the foreskin lengthwise. . . . The baby began to
gasp and choke, breathless from his shrill continuous screams. . . .
During the next stage of the surgery, the doctor crushed the foreskin
against the circumcision instrument and then, finally, amputated it. The
baby was limp, exhausted, spent."
Now she deeply regrets her sons' circumcisions and works tirelessly to
educate others.
Most people still don't know much about circumcision. If you have ever
read an article about circumcision, it probably focused on medical issues.
Recently The New York Times reported that public health officials were
considering promoting infant circumcision because of a controversial claim
that it could help prevent disease.
A few relevant facts may surprise you. Circumcision is the only surgery in
history ever advocated as a widespread means of preventing disease. When
such claims are investigated by national medical organizations, they are
found lacking. That's why no such organization in the world recommends
circumcision. Over 80% of the world's males are not circumcised. Though
many people associate circumcision with Jews, most circumcised males are
Muslims. The United States has the highest rate of non-religious
circumcisions of male infants in the world (32.5%). (The American rate
peaked around 1965 at about 85%.) American circumcision rates vary widely
depending on the region of the country.
In the continuous effort of certain American male investigators to seek a
medical benefit, the potential adverse effects of circumcision have been
ignored. Expanding the circumcision debate beyond medicine is overdue, and
women have good reasons to be involved. Critically examining circumcision
from psychological and sexual perspectives could show how this cultural
practice may affect some mothers of circumcised sons, some women in
relationships with men, and society. Before we consider these issues,
let's review a few of the effects of circumcision on infants.
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
HOW PAINFUL IS CIRCUMCISION?
A variety of studies confirm that newborn infant responses to pain are
similar to and greater than those in adult subjects. Robert Van Howe,
M.D., a Michigan pediatrician who has authored numerous studies about
circumcision, describes the infant's response. "Circumcision results in
not only severe pain but also an increased risk of choking and difficulty
breathing. Medical studies show significant increases in heart rate and
level of blood stress hormone. Some infants do not cry because they go
into shock from the overwhelming pain of the surgery." According to
clinical definitions and researchers' reports, circumcision is traumatic.
Even when pain medication is used (local injection, the best option
tested), it relieves only some of the pain, the effect is inconsistent,
and it wanes before the post-operative pain does. General anesthesia is
not considered safe for newborn infants.
Increased awareness of extreme circumcision pain by Jewish mothers has
contributed to growing questioning and forgoing of circumcision by some
Jews, as reported in dozens of articles appearing in mainstream Jewish
publications on the topic in recent years. Five rabbis endorse a book that
questions Jewish circumcision.
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
EFFECTS ON MOTHER-INFANT RELATIONSHIPS
The trauma of circumcision raises questions about effects on mother-infant
relationships. Based on more than twenty years of clinical observations
using leading-edge techniques, psychiatrist Rima Laibow, M.D., reports,
When a child is subjected to intolerable, overwhelming pain, he
conceptualizes mother as both participatory and responsible regardless of
mother's intent. . . . The consequences for impaired bonding are
significant. . . . Circumcision is an enormous obstacle to the development
of basic trust between mother and child.
Even though the physician does the circumcising, and the father may have
made the final decision to circumcise, the newborn infant connects the
experience to the mother. Because the experience is repressed, the
connection between the event and the mother is also repressed. (How this
repressed connection affects men's feelings toward women is not known.)
Studies have shown that circumcision can adversely affect mother-infant
bonding. Circumcised infants can be more irritable. Since infant
irritability at two days has been connected with insecure bonding at
fourteen months, the impact of circumcision on bonding may be more than
temporary. The effect of circumcision on mother-infant bonding and
interaction is evident in this account by Mary Milvich about her
experience around the birth of her first child:
I shared a hospital room with a mother whose son was born within hours of
my daughter. My roommate and I marveled at the identical personality
traits exhibited by our newborn babies. Both were perfectly calm, never
cried and gazed unwaveringly at our faces when we held them. We
experienced that maternal closeness the mother feels when she realizes her
baby knows her and accepts her as caretaker. . . . Delight in our
new-found joys of motherhood was shattered the following morning. My
roommate's baby had changed. He refused to nurse; he cried; he wouldn't be
held. "He doesn't want me," my roommate pitifully told the nurse. "It's
just the circumcision," the nurse told her comfortingly.
Investigators have confirmed that the trauma of circumcision may
contribute to the failure of an infant to breast-feed. In addition,
extended crying connected with circumcision may exceed the mother's
tolerance level. She could become more interested in relieving her own
distress (from hearing the crying) than that of her infant. If a mother
believes she is not able to relieve her infant's distress, she may feel a
lack of competence and respond less or not at all. She may also think her
infant has a "difficult" temperament and use that belief as a reason not
to respond.
Conversely, if an infant withdraws because of the trauma of circumcision,
he may not communicate his needs, the mother could assume he is content,
and his needs may not be met. Interaction between mother and child could
be frustrating and less rewarding for the mother if she receives only a
limited response from her child. Like all relationships, the mother-infant
relationship is a two-way social relationship that depends on the
responsiveness of both. If either the mother or the infant is
unresponsive, the relationship may suffer, and emotional disturbances
could occur. More research is needed.
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
MEN'S FEELINGS ABOUT CIRCUMCISION
To understand how circumcision may affect women in relationships with men,
we need to know how circumcision can affect men. Current knowledge of male
feelings about their circumcision is generally based on surveys published
in medical journals, clinical experience, and reports from men who have
contacted circumcision information organizations. These reports
collectively include thousands of boys and men. Circumcision advocates
dismiss these surveys and reports as "anecdotal."
In a medical journal survey of 546 self-selected men between the ages of
20 and 60 who reported circumcision harm, the following effects and
feelings were noted.
• anger, rage, sense of loss, shame, sense of having been victimized and
mutilated
• low self-esteem, fear, distrust, and grief
• relationship difficulties, sexual anxieties, and depression
• reduced emotional expression, avoidance of intimacy
Statements about circumcision from dissatisfied men include the following:
"I have felt a deep rage for a long time about this."
"Circumcision has given my life a much diminished and shameful flavor."
"I feel violated and abused."
Some of these circumcised men wish they had been given a choice at a later
time rather than having it forced on them when they were too young to
resist. Six medical societies in Australia and New Zealand and the British
Medical Association recognize the long-term psychological risks of
circumcision.
This survey does not suggest that all circumcised males have such feelings
or how common the feelings are, only that they persist in some circumcised
males, and more research is needed. There are various possible reasons why
we don't hear more from circumcised men about how they truly feel.
• lack of awareness and understanding that circumcision could be
associated with their symptoms
• emotional repression to defend against uncomfortable feelings
• fear of disclosure because they may be dismissed or ridiculed
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
EFFECTS ON MALE-FEMALE INTIMACY
Because research is limited, we can only speculate about how the potential
psychological effects of circumcision on men could inhibit their
relationships with women. For example, low male self-esteem, shame, fear,
distrust, and sexual anxiety can adversely affect communication and limit
the degree of intimacy. In addition, sexual intimacy is a major component
of male-female bonding, and research has shown that male sexual activity
increases when self-esteem is higher. If circumcision lowers both male
self-esteem and sexual sensitivity (to be discussed later), it would tend
to reduce male sexual activity and consequently weaken the pair bond.
Male-female relationships could also be restricted because some
circumcised men may feel a nagging sense that passion, excitement, or
sexual fulfillment is missing. If a man believes he cannot experience what
he is missing with a woman, he may withhold commitment and continually
seek new women to give him hope. In addition, the reduced emotional
expression of circumcised men may dampen women's feelings. As a result,
both men and women may feel something is missing from their relationships.
From a larger perspective, it would not be surprising if circumcision were
found to have a negative effect on interpersonal relationships, since
circumcision is a trauma, and trauma commonly impairs a person's relations
with others. Harvard psychiatrist, professor, and author Judith Herman
writes that after a traumatic event "a sense of alienation, of
disconnection, pervades every relationship."
Research has also shown that men have a lower physiological tolerance to
emotional stress than women do. Emotional numbing, a response to trauma,
would tend to reduce a person's tolerance to emotional stress. This would
account for the male tendency to avoid certain situations, such as marital
conflict. One method men use to control their exposure to this emotional
stress is to respond rationally rather than emotionally. Another tactic is
to withdraw or stonewall during a conflict. Both behaviors can weaken the
marital relationship by restricting communication and leaving conflicts
unresolved. Does circumcision increase America's uniquely high divorce
rate?
Emotional numbing also affects our sensitivity to others' pain because it
is related to our sensitivity to our own pain. When an infant is subjected
to the trauma of circumcision with nobody responding to his cries, he
experiences our insensitivity to his pain. If we do not have empathy for
infants, they may not have empathy for others. A male acquaintance, after
reading about circumcision, remarked, "It hurts, and the baby screams. So
what?" Circumcision may be an early experience that reduces male empathy.
It appears that there are a few reasons why circumcision could be a
contributing factor to relationship difficulties between men and women.
More research is needed.
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
EFFECTS ON SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS
To understand how circumcision may impair women's sexual relationships
with men, we need to learn about the foreskin. Christopher Cold, M.D.,
Chairman of Anatomical Pathology at the Marshfield Clinic in Marshfield,
Wisconsin, has studied and written about the foreskin. "It has important
functions. The foreskin protects the head of the penis throughout life
from contamination, friction, drying, and injury. It is an integral,
natural part of the penis, not 'extra.' On the average adult male it is
about twelve square inches [some circumcised men guess less than one
square inch], and it consists of a movable, double-layered sleeve. The
foreskin enhances sexual pleasure. Detailed study shows that it is made up
of unique zones with several kinds of specialized nerves that are
important to natural sexual function and experiencing the full range of
sexual sensations."
Loss of the foreskin results in thickening and progressive desensitization
of the outer layer of the head of the penis, particularly in older men.
Some men circumcised as adults report a significant loss of sensitivity
and regret the change. Circumcision may be an unrecognized factor in the
high rates of erectile dysfunction in American men, which would involve
associated psychological effects. Of course, any sexual and associated
psychological effects on men would affect women.
Women who have only had sex with circumcised men may not know what they
are missing. According to surveys in the medical literature, women
reported that they were significantly more likely to have vaginal dryness
during intercourse with circumcised men than genitally intact men. A
medical journal survey of women who had comparative sexual experience
included 138 responses. Other things being equal, on a scale of ten, they
rated genitally intact men 8.03 and circumcised men 1.81. With circumcised
partners, women were less likely to have one or multiple vaginal orgasms,
and their circumcised partners were more likely to have a premature
ejaculation. Circumcision was also connected with vaginal discomfort.
Women were less likely to "really get into it" and more likely to "want to
get it over with" if their partner was circumcised.
The results can be explained. The foreskin, as previously mentioned, is a
movable, double-layered sleeve. During intercourse, it glides up and down
the penile shaft, reducing friction and retaining vaginal secretions.
Without the foreskin, the skin on the penile shaft rubs against the
vaginal wall, resulting in friction and increasing the need for artificial
lubrication. The circumcised man has less sensitivity and requires deeper
and harder thrusting to try to compensate, further increasing the
friction.
With circumcised partners, surveyed women were more likely to feel
unappreciated, distanced, disinterested, frustrated, and discontented.
When their partners were not circumcised, women were more likely to feel
intimate with their partners, relaxed, warmth, mutual satisfaction, and
"complete as a woman," and the greater sexual satisfaction benefited the
relationship. To be clear, this does not mean that women cannot have a
satisfying emotional and sexual relationship with a circumcised man. Other
things being equal, it means that such a relationship may be likely to be
even more satisfying if the man were not circumcised.
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
MALE ABUSES TOWARD WOMEN
It is possible to compare circumcision rates by country to prevalence of
male abuses toward women that include violence, repression, isolation,
murder, rape, and forced marriage. The ten worst countries for women are
Afghanistan, Democratic Republic of Congo, Iraq, Nepal, Sudan, Guatemala,
Mali, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Somalia. Eight of these countries have a
male circumcision rate that exceeds 80%. Two other countries have a rate
between 20% and 80%.
In the United States, domestic violence is the single greatest cause of
injury to women. Every fifteen seconds a man beats a women. Low
self-esteem can contribute to this behavior. Men low in self-esteem are
more prone to jealously in their relationships. Jealously is a
precipitating factor in violence toward women. Predictably, low male
self-esteem, a possible effect of circumcision, correlates with a high
risk of domestic violence. It has also been documented that exposure to
violence in childhood is linked to later spousal abuse. The child
experiences circumcision as violent. Those who have been violated
generally have a problem with anger and may direct it at others.
The association between circumcision rates and abuses toward women could
be related to the long-term psychological effects of circumcision on men
which, in addition to low self-esteem and anger, include disruption in the
mother-male child relationship, post-traumatic stress disorder, weakened
relationships with women, and low empathy. More research is needed.
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
UNNECESSARY FEMALE SURGERY
Let's examine if the long-term effects of circumcision could affect the
surgical inclinations of circumcised doctors. For example, women are
subjected to excessive risk for unnecessary surgery in the United States.
Six of the top thirteen most frequently performed surgeries and procedures
were performed exclusively on women. An episiotomy is routinely performed
on a mother during birth. Some women view this obstetrical practice, which
has no demonstrated benefit and only adverse effects, as female genital
mutilation. About 569,000 hysterectomies a year lead to over 600 deaths
annually. Critics claim that 98% of hysterectomies are unnecessary.
Is there any connection between unnecessary female sexual surgery and male
circumcision? Virtually all cultures that widely practice unnecessary
female sexual surgery also practice unnecessary male sexual surgery, and
men control both practices. Such is the case in the United States. In
Europe where circumcision is rare, the rate of unnecessary female sexual
surgery is much lower. In addition, it seems that circumcised men who have
been denied the full expression of their sexuality may unconsciously seek
a way to deny others that pleasure, whether they use social custom, fear,
ignorance, or sexual surgery. According to psychological clinical
literature, such behavior is connected with the compulsion of those who
are traumatized to repeat the trauma on others. As psychiatrist Karl
Menninger said, "What's done to children, they will do to society."
Finally, a study on the underlying reasons for female genital mutilation
concluded that the motivation was psychosexual and included male fear of
female sexuality. A potential long-term effect of circumcision is fear of
female sexuality.
Addressing male circumcision may help dealing with female genital
mutilation and other forms of unnecessary female sexual surgery. Research
into this connection is important because these practices adversely affect
hundreds of millions of people worldwide.
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
WHY WOMEN ARE GETTING INVOLVED
There is much more we could investigate. Do potential anger and rage
associated with circumcision contribute to uniquely high American rates of
female murder victims, rape, and domestic violence? We do not know.
Because male motivation and money are steered toward seeking potential
benefits for circumcision, we are not likely to know all the effects of
circumcision any time soon. However, more than enough is now known (and
not known) to question this cultural practice. Women are particularly
encouraged to be involved in the circumcision decision for their son.
• Women are not subject to the personal psychological motivations of
circumcised men to want their son circumcised (e.g., "I want him to look
like me").
• Some women have experienced long-term regret ("deep wound of guilt" "my
gravest parenting mistake") if they consented to circumcision.
• Women sign the majority of hospital circumcision consent forms.
Times are changing. More women are thinking about circumcision seriously,
seeking independent sources of information, often long before giving
birth, and not yielding to men who want it for their son.
Because of male psychological resistance to this issue and the maternal
instinct to protect infants from harm, women are more likely to see
through the cultural blinders and take action. Women are getting involved
in educating others either personally, with the Internet, or through
pertinent organizations. One who is speaking out is Melissa Morrison, who
chose circumcision for her son because "it was something that was just
done." She watched her son's surgery and now deeply regrets her decision.
"People need to know what they are doing to their babies. I didn't know.
I'm talking to my girlfriends; I'm talking to mothers. If it helps just to
save one baby, then it's worth it."
............................................................................................................
Fitzgerald Scott will be the model for a new book by Rasa scheduled for
2013, the name is “When God Was a Penis.” Based on the Shakti religion –
oldest recorded on earth @22,000 years - (Paleolithic) – the sect of
penis is called “lingham worship.” Shaktis or Tantrics primarily worship
God through the body of a woman, especially her reproductive glands, even
her menstrual blood, but lingham worship is an important part of it &
Hinduism / Yoga today. Fitzgerald Scott is a perfect model for this as
not only is he beautiful, but he has a huge, beautiful penis, he is famous
for it. These images are ©Rasa Von Werder, 2013. Men in the past have
stolen Fitzgerald’s images as fantasy for low-minded masturbation. We
will now employ his beautiful penis for the highest-minded purpose,
worship of God, we will mark his beauty Sacred.
from KA LA:
My Dear Guru, now I am confused,are you the ''Messiah''?
I know the Messiah will be a woman -but who is it?
or are you the ''prophet''?
RASA:
I call William Bond "the Prophet of Matriarchy" - he is embarrassed by
that, but it's true.
Who am I? I am a Self Realized, Enlightened soul. I was sent here to
Empower women, & to bring back worship of Mother God to the earth. Mother
God will fix it all, but SHE MUST BE WORSHIPED. Also when She is
worshiped, women will be Empowered & they will be Venerated. I am the same
as Jesus when He was on earth. He was Enlightened & Self Realized, He knew
he was God, as are all Enlightened people.
KA LA:
HI! RASA!I want to tell you about the last dream I saw with you: We walk
through a city,holding hands,you are younger with long blond hair, you
tell me that you don't drink or like milk,and I ask -""what? not even in
your coffee?"" and you say ""yes not even that"".
The sentence: I don't drink milk, compares arithmological with your name.
I DON'T DRINK MILK=978= RASA VON WERDER
I just wonder !!!
RASA:
hahaha Off the top of my head: "I can live without human love" But need to
think more......"I am above human love, the world, I am detached, beyond
it" .....Milk means "human love, kindness, consolation" - Those who are in
nonduality, who have risen above the world, stay in a place where they
rely only on God, they R God, so they don't need human love etc. That's
why they can do miracles. As long as U need the approval & love of humans,
it keeps U in bondage to them. But I will think more, this is just my
first thoughts.
KA LA:
I don't need human love=12O6
Coffee without milk =1206
Thank you Rasa for explaining.
RASA:
hey that is GREAT
..................................................................................................
Learn more:
http://www.naturalnews.com/038598_vaccines_medical_hoax_government_documents.html#ixzz2HRMC4RC1
(NaturalNews) If you have children, you are more than likely already aware
of the official U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
"Immunization Schedules," which today recommend an astounding 29 vaccines
be given between birth and six years of age, including yearly flu shots,
as well as another five to 16 vaccines between ages seven and 18
(http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/). But a recent investigative
report compiled by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, Ph.D., uncovers more than 30
years of hidden government documents exposing these vaccine schedules as a
complete hoax, not to mention the fraud of the vaccines themselves to
provide any real protection against disease.
Though her paper focuses primarily on the British health system's
elaborate cover-up of the dirty truth about its own national vaccination
program, the tenets of the study's findings still apply to vaccination
schedules in general, which are typically designed for the purpose of
serving corporate interests rather than public health. Government
authorities, it turns out, in an ongoing bid to satisfy the private goals
of the vaccine industry, have deliberately covered up pertinent
information about the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccines from parents
in order to maintain a high rate of vaccination compliance. And in the
process, they have put countless millions of children at risk of serious
side effects and death.
You can access Dr. Tomljenovic's full paper here:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf
Hiding the truth and covering up data to encourage vaccine compliance
Through several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, Dr.
Tomljenovic was able to obtain transcripts of private meetings that were
held between the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI), a
so-called "independent expert advisory committee" that makes
recommendations to the government about vaccine policy, and various
British health ministers over the years. And after poring through this
plethora of information, which had previously been veiled from public
view, Dr. Tomljenovic made some disturbing discoveries.
"[T]he JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization) made
continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions
and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health
practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they
deemed were necessary for 'herd immunity,' a concept which ... does not
rest on solid scientific evidence," explains Dr. Tomljenovic in the
introduction to her paper.
"Official documents obtained from the U.K. Department of Health (DH) and
the JCVI reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in
such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of
protecting the national vaccination program."
These are some strong accusations, but the information Dr. Tomljenovic
gathered speaks for itself. Not only did the JCVI routinely ignore
questions of safety as they came up with regards to the ever-expanding
vaccination schedule, but the group actively censored unfavorable data
that shed a "negative" light on vaccines in order to maintain the illusion
that vaccines are safe and effective. Beyond this, the JCVI regularly lied
to both the public and government authorities about vaccine safety in
order to ensure that people continued to vaccinate their kids.
You can access Dr. Tomljenovic's full paper here:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf
JCVI was fully aware of MMR vaccine dangers as early as 1989, but covered
them up
Beginning on page three of her report, Dr. Tomljenovic begins outlining
the sordid details of meetings held as early as 1981 where the JCVI
clearly engaged in fraud, cover-up, and lies about vaccines to protect the
vaccine industry, not children, from harm. Minutes from these meetings
reveal that the JCVI actively tried to cover up severe side effects
associated with common vaccines like measles and whooping cough
(pertussis), both of which were clearly linked at the time to causing
severe brain damage in a substantial percentage of the children that
received them.
Of particular concern was how the JCVI handled unfavorable data on the
controversial MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella. 10 years before
Dr. Andrew Wakefield published his study on MMR in The Lancet, JCVI was
already fully aware that the National Institute for Biological Standards
and Control (NIBSC) had identified a clear link between MMR and
vaccine-induced meningitis and encephalitis. But rather than come forward
with this information and call for further safety assessments on the
vaccine, the JCVI instead censored this critical information from the
public, and blatantly lied about the safety of MMR for years.
"The extent of the JCVI's concerns with the implications of scientific
assessment of vaccine safety on vaccine policy explains why they were
opposed to any long-term surveillance for severe neurological disorders
following vaccination," writes Dr. Tomljenovic. "[I]nstead of
re-evaluating the vaccination policy, at least until safety concerns were
fully evaluated, the JCVI chose to support the existing policy based on
incomplete evidence that was available at that time."
In other words, the JCVI was more concerned with protecting the reputation
of the dangerous MMR vaccine, as well as many other questionable vaccines,
than with protecting children from sustaining serious injuries as a result
of getting the jabs. As far as the MMR vaccine is concerned, this critical
piece of information not only reinforces the legitimacy of Dr. Wakefield's
findings from 10 years later, which were illegitimately declared to be
fraudulent by the establishment, but also illustrates just how painfully
long this scam has been taking place.
Vaccine companies urged to manipulate data sheets, skew safety studies to
promote vaccines
If this is not bad enough, Dr. Tomljenovic also drudged up copious amounts
of information on the JCVI's longtime habit of encouraging vaccine
companies to deliberately alter their data sheets in order to make
dangerous and ineffective vaccines appear safe and effective, in
accordance with their recommendations. When the JCVI's guidance
contraindications for MMR, for instance, did not match those of the
vaccine's manufacturer, JCVI apparently instructed the manufacturer to
alter its data sheets to avoid "legal problems."
Similarly, the JCVI's official policy was to cherry-pick unreliable
studies to support its own opinions on vaccines rather than rely on
independent, scientifically-sound studies to make vaccine policy
recommendations. Once again, the JCVI's position on the safety and
effectiveness of MMR is an excellent example of this, as the group flat
out ignored legitimate MMR studies in favor of industry-backed junk
studies like the infamous 2005 Cochrane Review, which technically proves
nothing about the alleged safety of MMR because the 31 studies it
evaluated did not even meet the group's basic methodological criteria.
"Over the years, the JCVI has consistently promoted the MMR vaccine as
safe, based on studies that have been proven to be either irrelevant,
inconclusive, or methodologically questionable," explains Dr. Tomljenovic,
adding that the JCVI routinely chose to rely on flawed epidemiological
studies that only identified "association" rather than "causation," a
rather ironic inaccuracy in light of how scrutinizing the establishment
typically is of studies that contradict its own positions.
The eye-opening, 45-page paper goes on to explain how vaccine schedules
were established through the calculated downplaying of vaccine safety
concerns and the over-inflating of vaccine benefits; the promotion of
dangerous new vaccines into the pediatric schedule through deception; the
discouraging of vaccine safety follow-up studies; and the widespread
brainwashing of the public through manipulation and scientific
sleight-of-hand tricks.
Be sure to check out the complete study for yourself:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf
Sources for this article include:
http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com
http://foodfreedomgroup.com
Learn more:
http://www.naturalnews.com/038598_vaccines_medical_hoax_government_documents.html#ixzz2HRMC4RC1
............................................................................................................
Lawrence LeBlond for redOrbit.com – Your Universe Online
MOUNTAIN GORILLAS SAVE THEMSELVES FROM SNARES! WHAT INTELLIGENCE!
In what can only be described as an impassioned effort to save their own
kind from the hand of poachers, two juvenile mountain gorillas have been
observed searching out and dismantling manmade traps and snares in their
Rwandan forest home, according to a group studying the majestic creatures.
Conservationists working for the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International
were stunned when they saw Dukore and Rwema, two brave young mountain
gorillas, destroying a trap, similar to ones that snared and killed a
member of their family less than a week before. Bush-meat hunters set
thousands of traps throughout the forests of Rwanda, hoping to catch
antelope and other species, but sometimes they capture apes as well.
In an interview with Mark Prigg at The Daily Mail, Erika Archibald, a
spokesperson for the Gorilla Fund, said that John Ndayambaje, a tracker
for the group, was conducting his regular rounds when he spotted a snare.
As he bent down to dismantle it, a silverback from the group rushed him
and made a grunting noise that is considered a warning call. A few moments
later the two youngsters Dukore and Rwema rushed up to the snare and began
to dismantle it on their own.
Then, seconds after destroying the one trap, Archibald continued,
Ndayambaje witnessed the pair, along with a third juvenile named Tetero,
move to another and dismantle that one as well, one that he had not
noticed beforehand. He stood there in amazement.
“We have quite a long record of seeing silverbacks dismantle snares,”
Archibald told Prigg. “But we had never seen it passed on to youngsters
like that.”
And the youngsters moved “with such speed and purpose and such clarity …
knowing,” she added.
“This is absolutely the first time that we’ve seen juveniles doing that …
I don’t know of any other reports in the world of juveniles destroying
snares,” Veronica Vecellio, gorilla program coordinator at the Dian Fossey
Gorilla Fund’s Karisoke Research Center, told National Geographic.
Every day trackers from the Karisoke center scour the forest for snares,
dismantling any they find in order to protect the endangered mountain
gorillas, which the International Fund for the Conservation of Nature
(IUCN) says face “a very high risk of extinction in the wild.”
Adults generally have enough strength to free themselves from the snares,
but juveniles usually do not, and often die as a result of snare-related
wounds. Such was the case of an ensnared infant, Ngwino, found too late by
Karisoke workers last week. The infant’s shoulder was dislocated during an
escape attempt, and gangrene had set in after the ropes cut deep into her
leg.
A snare consists of a noose tied to a branch or a bamboo stalk. The rope
is pulled downward, bending the branch, and a rock or bent stick is used
to hold the noose to the ground, keeping the branch tight. Then vegetation
is placed over the noose to camouflage it. When an animal budges the rock
or stick, the branch swings upward and the noose closes around the prey,
usually the leg, and, depending on the weight of the animal, is hoisted up
into the air.
Vecellio said the speed with which everything happened leads her to
believe this wasn’t the first time the juveniles had dismantled a trap.
“They were very confident,” she said. “They saw what they had to do, they
did it, and then they left.”
Since gorillas in the Kuryama group have been snared before, Vecellio said
it is likely that the juveniles know these snares are dangerous. “That’s
why they destroyed them.”
“Chimpanzees are always quoted as being the tool users, but I think, when
the situation provides itself, gorillas are quite ingenious” too, said
veterinarian Mike Cranfield, executive director of the Mountain Gorilla
Veterinary Project.
He speculated that the gorillas may have learned how to destroy the traps
by watching the Karisoke trackers. “If we could get more of them doing it,
it would be great,” he joked.
But Vecellio said it would go against Karisoke center policies and ethos
to actively instruct the apes. “We try as much as we can to not interfere
with the gorillas. We don’t want to affect their natural behavior.”
Pictures of the incident have gone viral and numerous fans on the Fund’s
Facebook page have shared comments cheering for the young silverbacks.
Archibald said capturing the interaction was “so touching that I felt
everybody with any brains would be touched.”
....................................................................................................................................
THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT ...... PAEDOPHILES EVERYWHERE
David Icke Newsletter Preview
British royal and political Establishment with its global significance
peers over
the cliff.
The David Icke Newsletter Goes Out On Sunday
It is starting to get silly now and the arrest and questioning of major
political
and Establishment figures must take place in at least the next few weeks
if the
police investigation is to retain any public confidence.
The evidence for a massive paedophile ring infesting the royal palaces,
Downing
Street and the Westminster Parliament is overwhelming and mounting by the
week. The
implications of the full truth being revealed can hardly be overstated – the
devastating discrediting of the major political parties and the end of the
monarchy.
It would bring about a total public re-evaluation of everything they have
believed
about the country they live in and the forces that dictate its laws,
direction and
methods of operation. The same is true for much of the rest of the world
because
what I am about to describe is happening in every country – not least in
the United
States.
The revelations about record-breaking paedophile and child procurer Jimmy
Savile
have exposed the former BBC ‘star entertainer’ as a purveyor of sheer evil
on a
scale that would challenge any imagination. Here are the cold and shocking
numbers
according to the police – and these are not even nearly the whole story:
450 people of both sexes have made complaints about Savile involving 28
police areas
throughout the country and among them are 34 alleged rapes. The abuse
spanned a
period of 54 years between 1955 and 2009 when Savile was 82. The abuses
happened to
23 children and young people on BBC premises, at 14 hospitals and at least
one
hospice. More than 70 per cent of his victims were under 18 and one was as
young as
eight.
Metropolitan Police Commander Peter Spindler said that Savile’s crimes
were 'vast,
predatory and opportunistic' and he had effectively 'groomed the nation'.
Sounds
good, but I would not personally trust the Met’s investigation Operation
Yewtree to
pursue the full truth about Savile any more than I would have trusted him
to produce
the school nativity.
Spindler added – ludicrously – that Savile used his celebrity to 'hide in
plain
sight'. Oh, no, no, no, mate. That will not do. Savile got away with it
for 54 years
because he was protected by the highest levels of the
paedophile-Satanist-controlled
British Establishment for whom he was procuring children.
Lest we forget: Disc jockey Jimmy Savile was a very close friend of the
royal family
including Lord Louis Mountbatten, Prince Philip and Prince Charles from
the 1960s
until he died aged 84 in 2011. Savile was also a close friend of Prime
Minister
Margaret Thatcher who ran one of the most paedophile-infiltrated
administrations of
modern times – yes and with all the competition, too.
Now a new front is emerging to expose the ring’s sickening activities – the
notorious Elm Guest House in Rocks Lane, south-west London. I have been on
the trail
of Elite paedophilia and Satanism on both sides of the Atlantic for two
decades but
I still shake my head at the same recurring names year after year in
location after
location.
Names emerging from sources seeking to expose what happened at Rocks Lane
have
included a Thatcher cabinet minister who has come up so often it is
extraordinary
testimony to the Establishment’s ability to cover up that he is still at
large and
considered worthy of political influence.
Another ‘Elm name’ familiar to me is Anthony Blunt who is alleged to have
used the
name 'Anthony Goldstein' when visiting Rocks Lane. Blunt was one of the
infamous
‘Cambridge Five’ British Intelligence insiders who spied for Russia. Four
of them
were Blunt, Burgess, Maclean and Philby and the 'Fifth Man', never named,
was Lord
Victor Rothschild although there were actually more than five.
And Blunt leads us once again to the British royal family …
TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE DAVID ICKE NEWSLETTER, GET IMMEDIATE ACCESS TO HIS
FANTASTIC
NEWSLETTER LIBRARY ON A HOST OF SUBJECTS GOING BACK TO 2005, AND SEE HOURS
OF VIDEO
FOOTAGE OF DAVID'S INFORMATION, PLEASE CLICK HERE ...
What David Icke has said since 1998 about paedophile and child killing Prime
Minister Ted Heath is backed-up here by barrister Michael Shrimpton, an
Intelligence
and national security consultant, from his own contacts and inside experience
And while all this happening, and with people in desperate financial
straits through
the bank-created economic crash and government austerity policies, the
Addams family
can still do this
COME ON PEOPLE - HOW MUCH LONGER ARE WE GOING TO LET THEM
David Icke's Amazing 10-hour Wembley Arena Event Can Now Be Seen Here
http://www.davidicke.com/wembley
David Icke's New Book Remember Who You Are Is Now Available As An E-Book For
No comments:
Post a Comment