My Matriarchal Journey

 Back at the end of the 1980s I wrote a book with the help of my friend Pamela Suffield a book called “Gospel of the Goddess”. We wrote as a New Age book but soon found out most New Agers were not interested in it. Not even women into Goddess spirituality. The only people who liked our book was the Femdom community who then contacted us. Pamela soon lost interest in this but I continued to communicate with them, but soon discovered a problem. 

In our book “Gospel of the Goddess” we not only claimed that God was a women we also suggested that women should rule the world. Which is what the femdom community liked. But we claimed that the reason why women should rule the world, is that women are far more caring and loving people than men. This was totally different to femdom fantasies which wanted women to not only be the dominant sex but to be cruel and sadistic as well. So I had problems with dealing with that. But because I kept in communication with the femdom community “Gospel of the Goddess” did get published in New York by Artemis Creations Publishing. Although it didn’t sell very well. 

I then got in contact with a women who called herself Goddess Dianna Vesta and I got on well with her. She encouraged me to go onto the internet and to me she came across to me as a very nice person yet she was pedaling Femdom fantasies, where women were very cruel to men. Then I came in contact with Rasa Von Werder and she was willing to promote my ideas about matriarchy and why God is a woman but she had no interest in femdom which made things a lot easier for me. At about the same time Dianna Vesta dropped out. So I continued working with Rasa Von Werder but I still found the biggest support for matriarchy and the idea that God is a woman, still came from the femdom community. 

But the problem both Rasa and I had was that in selling the concept that women should rule the world, because they are kinder people than men, didn’t fit in with the behaviour of female politicians. If we look at well known female politicians like Indira Gandhi, Margaret Thatcher, Angela Merkel and Hillary Clinton none of them demonstrated the caring and loving side of women. All of them proved to be as ruthless, corrupt and deceptive as any normal male politicians. The main reason for this is that women are told that, “love is a weakness”. So ambitious women are encouraged to suppress any maternal or nurturing instincts they have, if they want to succeed in the brutal world of patriarchal politics. 

The second problem we both had was that there was another matriarchal group called Matriarchal Studies. This was a academic matriarchal group that although believed in matriarchy they claimed that matriarchy was all about sexual equality. It wasn’t about women ruling the world. As the result when Rasa attempted to contact these women she was strongly rejected. But it seems to me that their form of matriarchy is not matriarchy but feminism. I would agree that a community ruled by women is far more likely to be more equal than any patriarchal society. But surely matriarchal is in the end, female rule. If we had a egalitarian society ruled both by men and women, men would compete against women for power and women would in the end have to act and behave like male politicians or lose power. Which is the situation we have today, where female politicians have to suppress any loving feelings they have, if they want political power.

A third problem we had, was that the only argument we has for claiming that God was a woman was that Jesus claimed that God is a God of love. So it would then make far more sense that a loving God would be female rather than male. The big problem with that, is that as atheists point out that; “if God is a God of love then, then why do we live in a world of suffering?” Which is a difficult problem to answer, not only for us, but for all Christians. 

Then a couple of years ago I read about the ancient Greek legend of how the Greek Goddess Gaia come into being when she emerged out of chaos. At first I just saw this as just an alternative explanation to how the universe began, but the more I thought about it I began to realise that it explained so much more. At it explains why God is female and why a loving God would create a world of suffering like we now live in. You  can read a full explanation of this in my book; Mother God Hypothesis. Or in my previous article.

From this I learnt that men are here on this planet to learn how to love and women are their teachers. But unfortunately men also teach women to reject love as they claim it’s a weakness and even teach women how to hate. This then is why we need a religion the explains why God is female and why we need to live in a matriarchal society. So men can learn to except that women are their teachers in teaching them how to love and stop them from teaching women the opposite to this.

Amazon.com

Blog

Why God is a Woman

 For anyone who asks questions like; “why are we here?”, or “what is the purpose and meaning of life?” Then the whole world is a mystery. It’s even more of a problem if you’re also interested in cosmology, because then you also ask; “where do we come from?” which is also a very difficult question. This question has occupied the minds of philosophers throughout history and no one can give a undisputed answer to this question. 

In the past there was two answers to this question. Many religions claimed that, a God created the world. But that is disputed by atheists and secularists who then ask; “who or what created God?” and religions have no answer to this question. But atheists or secularists didn’t have a satisfactory answer to how the world was created either. All they could do was claim the world is eternal, so it never had a beginning. Which is a mind boggling concept. But then at the beginning of the 20th century scientists came up with a much better and more acceptable way our universe was created, in what came to be known as the Big Bang Theory. 

As 20th century technology began to produce bigger and better telescopes, astronomers began to obtain a clearer understanding of the size and nature of the whole universe. And through this they began to notice that galaxies seem to be flying apart from each other. So some astronomers, like Edwin Hubble then asked the question, “what would happen if we go back in time when these galaxies were closer together?”. From this came the calculation that 13.8 billion years ago the whole universe was a single clump of matter. From this came the Big Bang Theory which claimed the whole universe exploded out of nothing. 

How a universe was able to explode out of nothing is never satisfactory explained, but for many people it is a far better explanation than any idea that a God created the universe, or that we live in an eternal universe. But it is claimed that; science is indifferent to any personal bias or anything we wish to believe. So although the foundation of the Big Bang Theory is built on science, but then science then began to dismantle and destroy this theory through what is known as the fine-tuned universe hypothesis. 

In 1961, the physicist Robert H. Dicke pointed out that gravity and electromagnetism, must be perfectly fine-tuned for life to exist in the universe. Then astronomer Fred Hoyle took this concept even further and in his 1983 book, “The Intelligent Universe”. Where he pointed out many other ways our universe is fine-tuned. Unfortunately most of the general public is unaware of this because you need to be a scientist to properly understand the fine-tuned universe hypothesis. For instant there is the Cosmological Constant. Which is the energy density of the vacuum which must balance with extraordinary precision. If it was to differed by just one part in 10^50, the universe would either expand too fast for galaxies to form, or it would collapse catastrophically. (10^50 is 10 with 50 zeros. A trillion has only 12 zeros, so 10^50 is an extremely higher number.)

The main forces known to science is gravity, electromagnetism, the strong Nuclear Force and the weak Nuclear Force. Again it was discovered that all these forces are so finely balanced that if any of these forces was not exactly right, then atoms could not be created. So the fundamental building blocks of matter could not exist without all these forces being so finely tuned. This then undermined the Big Bang Theory because how did universe became so finely tuned when it exploded out of nothing? The Noble prize physicist Sir Roger Penrose calculated that this would be so unlikely that it is 1 in 10^10^123 for us to live in the stable universe we live in. This is a number so high that it is even much more than the estimated number of atoms in the observable universe. It would be even more unlikely if you created a huge explosion inside a rock formation and the debris from the explosion came down and formed into a circle of perfectly formed houses made of stone. But the Big Bang Theory is also coming under attack from the findings of the new James Webb space telescope. Because what this telescope is discovering about our universe, does not fit with the claims and calculations of the Big Bang Theory. 

The problem is for atheistic and secular scientists is that the fine-tuned universe hypothesis seem to strongly suggest that a great intelligence created our world. This seems to prove that a God created the world after all. But if that’s true it still doesn’t answer the question, “who or what created God?”

But then many people would claim that this is an unknowable question. But recently I discovered the answer to this question was hidden in ancient myths. I was looking on-line about the ancient Greek Goddess Gaia where I learnt that the Ancient Greeks called her “The Mother of Everything” and she emerged spontaneously from Chaos. She then created all other gods, mortals and the whole world. 

This is very similar to how atheist scientists claimed that life emerged on our planet from something they call; Abiogenesis. Where in primordial soup the right chemicals in the right conditions came together to form the first spark of life. (Although no scientist up until now, has been able to produce life from non-living matter.) There is also the Infinite Monkey Theorem which is a thought experiment by the French mathematician Émile Borel. He claimed monkeys hitting typewriter keys at random would over time write the whole works of Shakespeare. So could this be how Gaia spontaneously emerged from Chaos? 

So it suggests we do live in a infinite universe, but it was at one time a sea of chaos. But in that chaos there would be infinite possibilities. So over infinite time and space there would be a chance formation of energy that would create the first intelligence. But if this is true, then this first intelligence would have to be feminine. The reason for this is that a masculine intelligence would fight and compete against the surrounding chaos. Which would only create more chaos and so a masculine intelligence would end up drowning in the chaos it was fighting against. Whereas a feminine intelligence would do her best to work with the surrounding chaos and try to create order from it. And so by doing this she would become larger and stronger. So it does suggest that in time, it was she that created the stable and orderly universe we now live in. 

This then suggests that the sea of chaos is represented by the masculine because the masculine represents aggression, competition, conflict, fighting, war which finally leads to chaos. Whereas the feminine is all about love, caring, order and nurturing which leads to harmony. So it would be a feminine God that would create the fine-tuned universe. But if that’s the case, why do we have men representing the masculine which leads chaos, living on the same planet as women? Because women represents the feminine which tries to create love, order and harmony around her. The reason might be that a planet of only men, would in time destroy each other in violence and war. So you need women to prevent men from doing this. But women pay a heavy price for trying to save men because they have been abused, assaulted, murdered and oppressed by men throughout history. 

So why would a Female God allow women to come to a planet like ours to be so badly ill treated by men? The answer to this question is that women are spiritual teachers and attempt to teach men how to love. Unfortunately many men resist this, as they think “love in a weakness” not understanding that love in the most powerful force in the universe, because unconditional love unite us all in oneness, which is what God is. So instead men try to teach women that love is weak and even go as far as to teach women how to hate. We even see this is the Christian religion where Jesus tried to teach men how to love, but his teachings are still ignored by many Christians who instead judge and condemn others. 

I would need a book to explain it all, which I have written in my book, “Mother God Hypothesis.”

 

Amazon.com

Blog

Another Great Cute Animal Video!

 

The Misogyny-Misandry Death Spiral (Re-Post)

By Ajax the Great (Pete Jackson)

(Originally posted on the Vive La Difference! blog)

With all that has been going on in the world lately, one common thread seems to be noticeable these days.  Scratch the surface of so many problems, and you will often find some flavor of misogyny lurking under the surface.

First, some definitions:

Misogyny:  hatred and/or hostility towards Women and girls

Misandry:  hatred and/or hostility towards men and boys

Misanthropy:  hatred and/or hostility towards humanity in general, regardless of gender

After the 2024 election in the USA, the 4B Movement (of Women to essentially boycott men) began trending stateside online, though it was already several years old by then in the Republic of Korea (South Korea), its birthplace.  Dig a little deeper into exactly why it originated there, of all countries, and you will see that they actually have a pretty massive and systemic misogyny problem over there.  It's often very subtle of course, and the fellas there always seem so nice and friendly to outside observers from the rest of the world, but beware:  a "kinder, gentler patriarchy" is still a patriarchy.  They are basically a traditional society that has rapidly (and unevenly) modernized, and still has a LOT of old patriarchal baggage to unpack.  And just beneath the surface, it is apparently downright horrifying for so many of the Women of South Korea, so much that so many want nothing to do with men at all if they can help it.  And it really shows most starkly of all in their all-time record low birthrates (lowest in the world currently, with a TFR of as low as 0.80-0.90 children per Woman, less than half the replacement of 2.1) which no amount of pronatalism seems to be able to raise (and not for lack of trying!).  

Even their utterly dystopian and Stalinist totalitarian neighbor to the north (the DPRK, or North Korea) somehow manages significantly higher rates of procreation than South Korea these days, so that really says something indeed!

Now zoom out to the world as a whole, particularly on the internet and social media.  Misogyny seems to be reactionary, refractory, and recrudescent in recent years all over the world, with the USA being the most recent ground zero for this ugly trend.  And in very recent years, especially online, you will also notice at least in some circles an equal and opposite reaction (i.e. misandry) per Newton's laws of physics, even though it is not systemic like misogyny is.  But it does appear to unwittingly give ammunition to the latter all the same, unfortunately.  And social media only amplifies both hostilities further, and it ultimately spills over into the offline world as well.  Zoom out even further and look at it on a longer time scale as well, and you will clearly see a vicious cycle and downward spiral occur as follows:

Misogyny begets misandry begets misogyny begets misandry begets misogyny begets misandry begets misogyny begets misandry begets misogyny begets misandry begets misogyny, and so on.

It's enough to turn practically anyone into a full-blown, all-around misanthrope!  At least then, you don't actually have to decide which gender you dislike the most.

This phenomenon is what I call the "Misogyny-Misandry Death Spiral", or MMDS for short.  And the MMDS is a negative-sum (lose-lose) game for all. It leads to nothing but tribalism, polarization, balkanization, and toxicity all around. As Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. famously said, "Hate cannot drive out hate.  Only love can do that".

Divide et impera. Divide and rule. Rinse and repeat. While the oligarchs laugh at the "little people" all the way to the bank.

The results of the 2024 election in the USA are in fact both a cause and a consequence of this vicious death spiral, which threatens to destroy the country, and ultimately the world if left unchecked, as we are seeing.  Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind, basically.

Of course, men could very easily end this spiral right now along with the broader gender war if they truly wanted to, by "accepting the unacceptable" and surrendering to Women.  But unfortunately, there is nowhere near a critical mass willing to do so at this time yet.

Reminder: This Blog Will Be Updated Irregularly Going Forward

Just a heads up, dear followers.  Due to current events, going forward, this blog will be updated on a more irregular basis than in the past.  Don't worry, this blog is not going away!  Stay tuned, everyone.

To be continued.......

ICYMI: William Bond's New Book: Mother God Hypothesis (Now Available In Blog Form As Well)

The great author and prophet William Bond's latest book, Mother God Hypothesis, has been published and is now available on Amazon UK and Amazon USA.  It is also now available in blog form as well here: https://mothergodhypothesis.blogspot.com/

To quote the abstract/overview of the book:

Book overview

If God is a God of love, why do we live in a world of suffering?

Atheists say the answer is simple: there is no God. Religious believers struggle to explain it. In The Mother God Hypothesis, William Bond offers a radical third possibility — one that draws on quantum physics, ancient archaeology, comparative mythology, and the fine-tuned universe theory to argue that the true nature of God is female.

Bond traces the evidence for a Great Mother deity back through thousands of years of suppressed history — from the goddess figurines of prehistoric Europe to the sacrificial/saviour gods whose teachings of unconditional love kept reappearing across cultures, only to be distorted by patriarchal rulers. He examines how the Gaia hypothesis, quantum mechanics, and the extraordinary fine-tuning of universal constants all point toward a cosmic intelligence that is nurturing, creative, and maternal.

At the heart of the book is a striking proposition: Earth is a school, designed by the Great Mother, where humanity learns how to love. Women, closer to the Mother's nature, serve as teachers. Men, driven by competition and aggression, are the students. And the suffering we see around us is not evidence of God's absence — but of an education still in progress.

The Mother God Hypothesis challenges both atheist materialism and patriarchal religion, offering a theology built on unconditional love, ancient wisdom, and modern science.

Excellent book overall.  Be sure to check it out!

"Soulshine" by Allman Brothers Band

Rest in Paradise, Guru Rasa Von Werder.  Thinking of you again.  Your soul is certainly shining!