How is it Possible for Women to Rule the World?

 Since the 1980s I have been advocating both matriarchy and that God is a woman. But thinking about it these two concepts are in contradiction with each other. Because if God is female then why are we living in a patriarchal world? Surely a female God would ensure that it’s women who rule the world and not men. We can only understand this contradiction by realising that we are first and foremost spiritual beings. So life on Earth, in our material bodies, is only a small part of our existence. As I have written in my new book, Mother God Hypothesis, the purpose of living our on planet is to learn love. Where women are the teachers and teach men how to love. 

So if the spiritual purpose of women is to teach men how to love. Then surely it would be easier for women to do this if women ruled the world? That’s true, but both men and women also have to be tested to truly know if we understood how to love. So the way to do this, is in a patriarchal society where men have responsibility for ruling the world and see how they will rule when they are in-charge. But when women released the reigns of power and allowed men to rule our world it went badly wrong from the beginning. Scientists using DNA evidence has shown that about 7000 years ago in Europe and the Middle East 95% of all men were killed but not women. It seems that 7000 years ago men fought such savage wars, the majority of men died in this violence. This has been supported also by archaeology where mass graves of men have been discovered by archaeologists, where all the men showed signs of a violent death. 

This was theorised in 1950s and 60s by the archaeologist Marija Gimbutas who claimed that peaceful Goddess cultures were conquered by people she called the Kurgan. At the time this theory was strongly disputed but in more recent times, DNA evidence have supported her theories. Although nowadays they call the Kurgan people the Yamnaya. A good video explaining this is called; Ancient Civilizations: The Goddess vs. The Yamnaya.

So the switch from matriarchy to patriarchy got off to a very bad start. But Mother God is forgiving, tolerant and understanding and so men were allowed to continue to rule. And to their credit they did manage to curb their extreme violence and somehow create societies without murdering each other. Although wars and genocide did continue as well as slavery and the oppression of women. Unfortunately this has been the story of patriarchy ever since. Although it has to be admitted things have slowly changed for the better. For instance, back in Roman times gladiators were forced to fight each other to the death for the sole purpose of entertaining Roman spectators. There is no place on our planet today, where this would be tolerated or accepted. So everything is slowly changing for the better, like we see in the 19th century, where both slavery and serfdom were both abolished. But wars and even genocide are still happening today in the 21st century. 

But patriarchy hasn’t only just been a test of love for men, it also at test for women as well. Teaching love to men in a matriarchal society would have been a lot easier for women, because they would have the status and authority to do this. It is far more difficult for women to do this in any patriarchal society because women would be teaching men love from the position of being a second class citizen. Because of this, many women have found this so difficult that they have ended up being taught by men that; “love is a weakness”. So many women have learnt from men, how not to love and even how to hate. 

In spite of the progress men have made in becoming more loving people compared with what they were like thousands of years ago. There are signs that MotherGod has decided to bring this test to an end we can see this in the rise of feminism. This started back in the 18th century with the book; “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman” by Mary Wollstonecraft. Since then feminism has grown so that in the 20th century, there has been large numbers of countries throughout the word which has given equal rights to women. So will this lead to a matriarchal world? It might happen but at present one of the biggest opponents of matriarchy are feminists. Feminism has been very successful by promoting the concept of sexual equality. So they see matriarchy as being the flip side of patriarchy where women oppress men in much the same way as men have oppressed women. For this reason many feminists oppose matriarchy as strongly as they oppose patriarchy, because matriarchy undermines their argument for sexual equality. 

If that’s the case, how can matriarchy succeed if it’s being opposed by patriarchal men and feminist women? The only community I know who want matriarchy and women to rule the world, is the femdom community but they promote feminists worse fears. They have fantasies of cruel women who use men like abused slaves. So this form of matriarchy wouldn’t work, because the spiritual purpose of women is to teach men how to love. But perhaps we won’t need a matriarchal movement like feminism to bring about matriarchy, it might just happen spontaneously. How this could happen we can see women’s academic performance. I looked this up on the internet and this is what I got. 

Grade Performance: Meta-analyses confirm that girls earn higher grades than boys in all major subjects, including mathematics and science, with the gap being largest in language courses and smallest in STEM fields. 

Educational Attainment: Women began earning more college degrees than men in the mid-1980s and continue to dominate enrollment; in 2018, 57% of students in U.S. degree-granting institutions were female. 

Subject-Specific Nuances: While women generally achieve higher grades, men may still score higher on standardized math and science tests, though recent research indicates negligible gender differences in actual mathematical ability. 

Graduation Rates: Women have higher graduation rates in every U.S. state, with female graduation rates exceeding 70% in 16 states compared to only two states for men.

So it seems that feminist activism in pushing for equality in academia, has resulted in women outperforming men. So in theory this should result in women taking over and ruling our world, but this hasn’t happened yet. The reason is that women have a couple of more hurdles to jump over, to do this. The main one is childbirth. Many career minded women end up having to choose between having a career or having children. This is less of a problem for women from wealthy families as she can hire a nanny to look after her children, but is a big problem for women who can’t afford to do that. As the result, the birth rate in countries where there is sexual equality has dramatically decreased. While in countries and cultures where women are still oppressed by men, so women are not encouraged to have a career, the birth rate still continues to rise. 

The second problem is that too many women now believe what men taught them, that “love is a weakness”. So many feminist women in trying to be equal to men believe that have to act and behave like men to gain power, wealth and status. The result has been that although we have seen an increase in the number of female politicians, all of them are as dishonest, crooked and duplicitous as the average male politician. So for the general public there is no advantage in voting for a female politician because she will probably be as corrupt as a male politician. 

The only way women can progress to matriarchy is to ditch feminism, even though it has served them so well, for more than the last two hundred years. So can feminism accept that men and women are very different? We see this already with trans women row, where biological men have tried to muscle into female sports by claiming they are women. This could have been the death of female sport if some brave sportswomen hadn’t had spoken up. This has resulted in women having to accept that men and women are biologically different, as men’s greater size and strength does give men a decisive advantage in nearly all sports. So if women can accept this, they then can accept how difference men and women are different, in so many other ways. Like we see in women’s academic achievements where women outperform men. Not that this is anything new, it has been written about in the 20th century in books like: The Natural Superiority of Women, by Ashley Montagu; Brain Sex, by Ann Moir and David Jessel and Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus, by John Gray. 

Feminist hated books like this because it undermines their argument that men and women are the same. But science does support everything these authors say about the difference between men and women. Two hundred years ago Mary Wollstonecraft made the argument that men and women are the same because sexist men at that time made claims that men ruled the world because they were more intelligent than women. Or that women were,”too emotional” to makes sensible decisions. (“Sensible” decisions like starting wars). But feminists have already won Mary Wollstonecraft’s argument for her. Academic women have proven that men are not more intelligent than women and are able to make sensible decisions. Very few men, (outside of Islam) would today dare publicly claim that men are more intelligent than women, like they did in the 18th and 19th centuries. So matriarchy is not as big a threat to women’s empowerment, as feminist believe it to be. 

So it should be possible to have a matriarchal political party which claims that it women would make better rulers than men if they act and behave like women and not try to imitate men. So women in a matriarchal party should make it clear that women have maternal and nurturing instincts and it’s natural for women to love and care for others. So they will follow their strongest instincts and care about the people they rule. Which means they will be not be corrupt and so won’t accept bribes from billionaires, large corporations or anyone else. But doing this they will demonstrate that love is a strength and not a weakness. 

The point is that the public are fed up with lying and corrupt politicians and will vote for any politician who tells the truth and does what she says she will do. So straight away we can see that a matriarchal party of real women who do follow their maternal instincts have a big advantage. It has been shown that a political platform like this can work. Jacinda Ardern used it to became Prime Minster of New Zealand. But as it turned out she proved to be a normal lying and corrupt politician who had no intention of keeping her election promises. So she quickly became very unpopular and was forced to resign. So this means that any Matriarchal political party not only has to tell the public they are caring and loving women, they have to put it into practise and keep their promises. When they get into power. Or they to will be vote out of power in the next election. Also, once there is one successful matriarchal government somewhere in the world. It will encourage people of other countries to try to do the same thing. 

It is well known that corruption is the main cause of decline of any country. For instance in China they are so frightened of corruption, that they have executed government officials who accept bribes. It is the main reason why the western countries are declining. Back in the early 1980s the Regan government proposed the idea of “deregulation”, claiming that too much regulation was hampering business dealings. Other western countries also adopted the same idea. What was not explained was that these regulations were there to try to prevent corruption. So when the regulations  were abolished, corruption in all Western countries went unchecked. So the Chinese economy who is doing it’s best to limit corruption is growing, while Western countries where corruption is rampant, is declining. This means that a matriarchal government who is serious about caring for the people and won’t accept bribes from anyone, will prosper and give their people a better standard of living. So once a matriarchal government gets into power, providing the women follow their maternal instincts, they will continue to rule as long as they like. 

Amazon.com

Blog