Pete-Rasa Positions Freedom/Justice etc.

 

 

 

Part 2  Position Statements Pete Jackson  Rasa Von Werder

Rasa’s remarks relevant to the New Religion – New Order

3-10-24

Q3)  Do you support a female dictatorship in which only Women could vote?

A3)  I personally do not support any kind of dictatorship, and that idea sounds dangerously similar to Karl Marx's idea of "dictatorship of the proletariat".  We all know how that ended.   The proletariat, or rather a tiny sliver of them, basically became the new bourgeoisie, and as they say the rest is history.  I believe democracy, as direct as possible, is ultimately the way to go.

Rasa says: in the New Order, it’s the Elders – all women – who decide on questions up for vote.  In that sense, it’s a democracy, but only on certain issues, only with women.  The original focus, doctrine, principles are all established by the FOUNDRESS – the way Jesus Christ brought forth Christianity.  He said ‘I am the Way, the Truth & the Life; no one comes to the Father but by me.”  He was not referring, as erroneously thought that folks must obey him personally, his personal body/self/ identity, but his WAY or PATH or principles of behavior, which we all know are ‘do unto others as you would have them do unto you’ & ‘love they neighbor as thyself’.  This IS the way to go & NO OTHER!  But to personally believe He is the ONE & ONLY GOD is not what He preached, IMO.  He said, ‘Don’t you know ye are Gods?’ & ‘Greater things you can do.’  & Paul said, ‘No longer I live but Christ in me.’  These tenets point to Godhood, leadership within us, but of course only with certain Anointed persons – Saints, Avatars, the Chosen - & certainly not with the ignorant, lost or demonic.

There is something WRONG in thinking that a RANDOM VOTE among all people, including most who are BENIGHTED, uneducated, uninformed, gullible, naïve, impressionable, easily led or swayed by lies, etc., that their vote could bring liberty & justice for all!

 And the ACLU does note the ‘tyranny of the majority.’  Consider the prejudices of the majority & their fears, - they will vote out of society the unusual, eccentric, those of foreign cultures & religions – anyone they cannot understand & therefore fear.  These will be vilified, marginalized, & cast over the cliff!  We’ve had numerous factions & individuals SUE to get their place in the sun, just ordinary rights, because the MAJORITY denied them such!

Consider the case of Jesus, when Pilate brought him out to the public, & called for a vote.  It was usual to give them a choice of one prisoner vs another – to let him free.  ‘Who do you want, Jesus or Barabbas?’  Pilate asked.

The crowed, easily swayed by the Rabbis, called,

‘Give us Barabbas!’  {the insurrectionist, murderer.}

And Pilate said do you want Jesus Blood on your hands?

And they cried, ‘Sure, let His blood fall on our heads & that of our children!’

This was the majority vote – the minority respected, worshipped & loved Jesus - Like Veronica, who came out with a cloth as Jesus carried his Cross to Calvary, & wiped His Sacred Face.  The intelligent, the good, those of God, were the minority, while those of the world & Satan were the majority.  {Let’s note the ‘Broad highway to Hell.} The MAJORITY crucified, killed Truth, Love & Light, while upholding evil, & Jesus said “They know not what they do.”

I know there’s quandary here – who decides who is Anointed?  Every political clown who comes along has a gift of gab & professes to be the one who’ll bring some measure of salvation to the masses.  But they’re all liars, they cannot save us.  Jesus did prove himself by signs & wonders, miracles, healings & feeding thousands out of a few fishes & loaves of bread.  And so, if we believe His way & the doctrine He set forth – the Golden Rule – then people that follow it might be the ones to lead.  Test the Spirits!

Those that are warmongers & oppress the poor are NOT sent by God!

Yes, I believe in the leadership of Jesus Christ & his principles, or for that matter, a Buddhist Saint – as Jesus was a reincarnated Buddhist Guru.  I believe in governance by Prophets & Saints, not the greedy, selfish monsters, demonics that usually lead the world.  Satan said to Jesus,

“I will give you all the Kingdoms of the world & their Glory, if you will bow down & worship me.”

The followers of Satan have taken him up on that – they line up to take his offer.

But Jesus said to Pilate,

“My Kingdom is not of this world.”

No, it isn’t.  But our Order IS of this world. Ditto Jesus’ Christianity. When Matriarchy returns, it is the Second coming of Christ – the SPIRIT of it, not his flesh.  He said when you can’t tell the summers from the winters is when He’ll return.  This is it, it’s around the corner, coming toward us.

In our Order the men will have choices or ‘votes’ like so:  Which female Member are you attracted to for sex or marriage - Jane, Joan or Rita?  Do you want to visit her many nights, once a week, or just once?  Or are you interested in living with her in which type of our Villages – {upon her agreement.}

What kind of volunteer work are you willing to do for the Order? Internet, computer work?  Teaching female Members computer skills, photo shop, Podcast work, monetization, etc.?  Agricultural?  Plowing fields with horse, bull or tractor? Using a scythe or other ways to harvest hay?  Cutting & chopping wood for the off-grid Village?  Teaching female members to do this work? Repairs on buildings or cars?  Teaching women to do the same?  Expert on painting indoors & outdoors – teach Members the same? Any other professional or skilled work you are able to provide?  Volunteering  will NOT give you an inroad or access to female Members for intimacy – it’s not a dating service.  There will be rules when you are on premises & chaperones.  The ‘dating’ field in our Order requires application.  You apply for the dance gatherings, where you are sifted by standards. Not looking for Mr. Perfect or Mr. Righteous, just one that is SAFE, reliable, will not hurt the members in any way {including mentally, emotionally} & be of value to the community.

Males will not be able to vote on anything to do with doctrine – God forbid!  Nor on how the Order is run, nor on what women do, in any way, shape or form.  They can only vote on their own choices. Like, what day of the week & time is best for you to have our Religious Service for YOU?  If most of them want Saturday, OK, if Sunday, we’ll provide that.  Do you want early or late?  OK, your choice, we try to adjust to what the majority of men can attend.

They can vote on what type of music we have at the dances.  My plan is a variety one hour this, one hour that.  Some lessons perhaps for social dances that require them.  Also planning to have semi-formal parties where guys will wear suits or tuxes {we’ll figure out where to rent or buy them, we won’t make it difficult} which give us a break from the monotony of ordinary clothes.  The women – especially young ones – would like to show off how good they look in party dresses – it’s good for social refinement also. You can buy cheap beautiful clothing at Temu – but it doesn’t always look like the images.  You might have to order 2-3 different items before you find a suitable one.

Now back to the women.  What can they vote on & which women?  On most issues that have any significance, only the Elders vote.  On insignificant things, all can vote.

You don’t have the children vote for important things the family does but on let’s say, where do you want to go to dinner – Pizza, Chinese or McDonald’s, they can vote.

As far as doctrine, there’s no vote.  The Founder is like Jesus to the Christians, her word is the word of God, she’s Anointed & God speaks to her & she hands it down to the rest.  There will be no tyranny or dictatorship of the kind men impose – It’s a POV you can accept or walk away from.  There are no arrests – no KGB or CIA or imprisonments if you go against the leader.

Just one more thing about voting in a place like the U.S.  You think your vote is valid?  They count them whatever way they wish.  Furthermore, alternatives to ‘Tweedle de De & Tweedle De Dum’ don’t have a chance, & they represent the Truth.  So this majority vote means NOTHING.  The next President & some governors are decided by Bilderbergers, Shadow Govt & Bohemiam Grove.  Other countries are as bad; corruption, military force, wealth –– Satan is the Prince of this world – Patriarchy.  {end}

Pete continues:  Furthermore, I do not believe it is necessary for men to forfeit their right to vote or any other civil rights in the Matriarchy of the future.  Not like it would really be our decision, though.

 

Q4)  What is your position on patriarchy?

A4)  Patriarchy is the problem.  What was the question?

Q5)  What is your position on capitalism?

A5)  See Question #4 above.  Capitalism is an outgrowth of the demonic patriarchy, and is an inherently evil and unsustainable economic system based on GREED.  Like patriarchy itself, it is a massive Ponzi scheme and protection racket, and it is KILLING the planet and its inhabitants.  Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell, which eventually kills its host. Ultimately, we need to move to post-capitalism if the human race is to survive. 

Q6)  What is your position on feminism?

A6)  As a believer in female empowerment in general, I support it.  Specifically, I support intersectional feminism, since the entire kyriarchy (not just patriarchy) needs to end yesterday.

 

Rasa explains:  The theory of intersectional feminism interests me.  My forte would be explaining how the adult trade women are discriminated against.  When I was part of NOW in the 70’s, the feminists themselves looked down on us, told us it was wrong – degrading - & we should quit – which is ABSURD.  Don’t know if or how this has changed for them, I stopped listening to feminists a while back & went on my own business of Female Empowerment, Female Superiority, & Woman, Thou Art God – the New Religion.

Feminism was a BEGINNING, it was necessary.  But, when that which is perfect has come, that which is in part shall be done away with.  Feminism started with fighting for equal rights under the law.  But now we know women are superior to men, genetically proven, so it’s a whole new ballgame.  That’s the front I’m working on.

Q7)  What is your position on abortion?

A7)  I consider myself to be both pro-choice and pro-life at the same time.  While I believe that abortion is at best a necessary evil (made necessary largely due to patriarchy and the rest of the kyriarchy), and that an ounce of prevention is worth at least a pound of cure, banning it or unduly restricting it would clearly do far more harm than good.  And that would be true regardless of what kind of system we would be living under.  Furthermore, I believe that no one should ever be forced, coerced, deceived, or brainwashed into having kids that they don't want or are not yet ready for--period.  And it certainly should NEVER be up to men to decide what reproductive choices women can make--period.  Thus, I believe that abortion should remain legal and available on demand. 

If we really want to reduce the number of abortions, there are several ways of doing without reducing individual rights.  For starters, birth control should be made available for free to anyone who wants it--all methods.  Honest and comprehensive sexuality education should be provided in schools to every student in an age-appropriate fashion.  To reduce the financial pressure to abort, the minimum wage should be raised, the social safety net must to be strengthened in general, and we should have a Universal Basic Income Guarantee for all.   Workers should have generous paid family leave and free or heavily-subsidized childcare.  Education should also be free of charge, from pre-K through post-grad.  Baby bonds that effectively make every baby a trust fund baby would also be a good idea for a number of reasons.  Do all these things and abortion really would be safe, legal, and rare.  And in a Matriarchal society, all of these things would be considered to be no-brainers, and would basically be a given.  Such a society would see to it that all mothers and children are well-cared for.   (Not like any men would actually dare to force pregnancies on women anymore if they knew what was good for them, of course.)  And if any self-proclaimed "pro-life" conservatives whine about so-called "big government" or "nanny state" being "too generous to the poor" or something to that effect, remind them of their favorite platitude: "if it saves even one child, it's worth it".

 

Rasa says:  Pete is right on all points & I agree.  Cannt find anything extra to add.

Q8)  What is your position on the death penalty?

A8)  I am generally against it, except perhaps for particularly dangerous terrorists.  Otherwise, the state becomes no better than the killers themselves, and there is too much potential for both abuse and mistakes.  Besides, life imprisonment without parole is a far worse punishment in my opinion.

However, when Women finally take over, they may decide that for whatever reason the death penalty should remain or be reinstated, and us fellas would just have to accept that regardless.  Until then, though, it should be abolished, or an indefinite moratorium on executions should take place.  Alternatively, we could let the convicts themselves decide between life without parole or death.

 

Women may very well decide to adopt Indigenous-style restorative justice as a third way instead, for example.  That said, that is not something that men should EVER feel entitled to, and would be the height of chutzpah to ever demand that of Women, except perhaps for very low-level offenders.

 

         Rasa says:  It isn’t, IMO, the death penalty that was to blame for injustice, but the way it was politically applied to those the white supremacy MALES decided.  Blacks getting executed for raping white women.  Women targeted by men for insane tortures & death during the Inquisition.  People being hanged for crimes not deadly in England & elsewhere.  A man imprisoned in France for whistling at Marie Antoinette spent 75 years in jail.  A woman in Las Vegas given life imprisonment for letting a 12 yr old boy touch her breast. A man in Canada allows his little daughter to touch his penis but this is dismissed as irrelevant in view of the abuses he did besides that. Outrageous judgments, favorable to certain men, bad for those they dislike.  People drawn & quartered by horses. Men allowed to live after this:

         It happened within one week at a hospital near me, the nurse told me about it.  First, a man bit off the penis of his 7 year old son! This is a death sentence to the boy’s life – I have no idea what was done to the ‘Father’. Another man raped an 8 year old girl & abused her to death.  This man was not executed, went to jail, & the inmates put a sneaker up his ass.  He was in the hospital getting it removed @ taxpayer expense.  He bragged to my nurse friend how great it felt to rape that little girl because all the blood felt so good to his penis. Nurse got reprimanded for telling the guy off!

         When justice returns during the time of Matriarchy, the death penalty should be applied fairly.  Those who abuse a child or any other person, through torture, then death, should be given the death penalty.  Some people deserve this.  If we don’t apply the death penalty to them we don’t have justice, we just have a bunch of criminals that we thereafter take care of.

 A Japanese cannibal male was in France attending school.  He askd a female student to help him with some poetry.  She came over.  He murdered her & ate part of her flesh.  They put him in an insane asylum in France, but the people protested why are we supporting this cannibal?  So they let him go & deported him to Japan, where he is living scot free, lolly gagging on his parents’ money taking females on free luxury cruises.  I saw his documentary.  We need the death penalty but it must be applied fairly & that is more likely to happen with Matriarchy.  {end}  Rasa Von Werder

Responses to the article:

William Bond appears

Hi Everyone:

Just thought I’ll give my opinion. I have mixed feelings about these questions. Ideally we should have a democracy where everyone has a vote and if we have community where only women can vote, then that is an apartheid system. But at the same time, if we want a matriarchy, we have to ensure men cannot take back power once again. And that becomes possible if men are given voting rights.  

Like it or not, men cannot be trusted because men do have aggressive and competitive instincts and some men will compete against women for power, if given the chance. So men will have to be controlled in a matriarchal system. But the people who will do the controlling, will probably be other men. This means a police force with female officers and probably a military as well, also with female officers. So it will mean a two class system with women in the upper class and men in the lower class. But I think women will be far more caring of men, then what men were in any extreme patriarchal system.  

I’m not going to comment on what laws women should have in a matriarchal system because that is up to women.    William

 It’s Pete again:

Good evening, William.  It's a very fine line I think.  While I still believe that me should be able to vote (for government leaders and ballot initiatives in the secular outside world, NOT the Order of course), what you say otherwise makes sense.  I definitely think men should be banned from any positions of real power, or running for any office higher than dogcatcher, lol, but they should be able to vote on which Women shall lead them, within reason, as well as at least certain selected ballot initiatives (but not to alter the Constitution). I too personally loathe anything that resembles an apartheid system, gender or otherwise.  And I still believe in no taxation without (some sort of) representation, though all representatives should of course be Women. 

Thank you for your insights  :)  Pete

Pete to Rasa:   Thank you for your excellent insights, Rasa. You make some very great points overall. 

I should add that pretty much everything I have said in my Position Statements is intended to apply to secular government in the outside world, not to the Order.  The objectives of the two are fundamentally different, and this discussion illustrates perfectly why we still need separation of church and state, even in the future after patriarchy is long gone.  For the outside world, I still think that democracy is, as Sir Winston Churchill famously put it, "the worst form of government, except for all the others".  A hybrid representative/direct democracy with a strong Constitution (that is fairly difficult to alter) I think is the very best defense against oligarchy, tyranny, and ochlocracy (mob rule).  And while both genders should be still allowed to vote for their leaders and at least some ballot initiatives and referenda, all political offices higher than dogcatcher should be held exclusively by Women.

Obviously, what you say would make far more sense for the Order though, and I cannot argue with that.  Well-said, Rasa. 

I would also like to add here that I agree with you in principle regarding the death penalty. But as long as men remain in charge, I would still argue that the convicts should be given a choice between life without parole and death, and must make their decision within 30 days. Most would probably choose death if they knew what was good for them! And I believe juveniles (under 18) should not be executed, period. But yes, for the kinds of monsters you describe, I agree, NO QUARTER! 

         Rasa again:

         Hi guys.  William, I feel you’re better aware of the evil women have gone through at the hands of men & how dangerous men are to others – more than does Pete.  It could be age.  You are 77, I am 78, & Pete is not yet 40.  Pete, how many crime shows, especially Forensic Files have you seen?

         There was the black man who broke into the first floor window of a white female, plunged a knife into her heart, & raped her with knife was in her heart.

         There was the white man who as a child – had done some atrocity {they did not say what} & was put into a mental hospital.  When hr got out his Dad made everyone swear not to squeal what he had done – no one knew he was criminally insane.

This man got married & was an avid fisherman.  He’d often come home with blood all over him he said from the fish – meanwhile there were murders happening in the area.

He was infatuated with his niece - had a closet pasted with dozens of pictures of her he ogled.

One night the niece came to stay with them – as I said, his insanity was kept secret so no one knew to be on their guard.

That night he killed his wife brutally.  Then he went upstairs, killed & dismembered his niece, putting her arms & legs & in strange positions, & put her head between her legs as if she was giving herself pleasure.

The first cop on the scene saw this, went outside & vomited.

All the serial killers – hundreds we know of all over the world – all men - John Wayne Gayce, Ted Bundy – killed dozens of persons in brutal ways. His last victim was a 13 year old girl in Florida – they finally got him for that.

 There have been women, not many – one old lady had a rooming house & killed old guys for their social security – buried them in the back yard & from thence used their checks.  But it wasn’t brutal or torture, she poisoned them.

Another lady stands out.  She first killed her husband with morphine.  She tried to kill her grown son in a fire she set in the basement where he slept, but he survived.  She then gave him a strong sedative & while he was sleeping strangled him with a tourniquet.  Then she bought a machine-saw in a store {they had the film of her in the store} & cut his body into pieces, drove 40 miles away, & threw the pieces here & there out of the car.

The one woman they label ‘serial killer’ – Aileen Wournos, committed only one genuine murder – the last guy who was a minister that offered her a place to stay.  The other men she shot & killed were self defense, they raped & abused her.  But she’s a woman so prosecution was swift; no delays in execution, while male murderers linger on death row for years.

Here we have two issues – should we use the death penalty, & how the justice system is politicized in favor of men.  Women who kill men will receive 6 times the penalty that men do for killing women.  Even when women kill their abusers in self defense, they don’t give them much sympathy. 

I could go on & on.  Suggest anyone who wants to abolish the death penalty watch as many crime shows as I have – you might change your mind.  Why should these people be given the prison hotel we have here in America?  They will not choose death over having 3 good meals a day, a warm room to sleep in, companionship, relationships & sex with other men, even recreation.  They set up weight lifting for the inmates; some get to train dogs & the poor dogs get to stay with them in their cell! They have the library for study, books & TV are provided.  They get visits.  All the comforts of home.  Why should they choose death?  This ain’t no ancient dungeon - dark, solitary, cold stones to sleep on, bread & water or slop for food.

As far as democracy & voting, Pete, I don’t feel you have defended your argument against mine.  I raised points you did not refute.  So, no cigar.

Pete to Rasa:  Thanks for your response again, Rasa.  I have seen many true crime documentaries on both TV and websites myself over the years, so yes, I am well aware of the evil that is out there.  I have no doubt about that.  I have also seen documentaries of what houses of horrors many American prisons can be as well.  Lots of rapes, murders, and suicides happen there.  (Programs like "Scared Straight" even make that seem like a feature rather than a bug.)  So I could see how at least some convicts, when given a choice, would choose death instead, especially since they known the other inmates generally won't take too kindly to people like them.  But back to the nuanced ethical issues surrounding the death penalty, I would say I have had mixed feelings about it overall due to its historical baggage, and over the years I have gone back and forth about it.  Even if some people do indeed truly deserve it IMHO.

On the issue of democracy, I'm afraid I really cannot refute all of your points entirely, Rasa.  What I do know is that, for all of its many flaws and vulnerabilities, democracy is still on balance at least somewhat better than the various oligarchies, tyrannies, dictatorships, juntas, monarchies, theocracies, empires, etc. throughout history, even if that is of course a pitifully low bar to clear.  And the way things stand now, the USA is a democracy in name only, and in reality is a rigged oligarchy, plutocracy, and  kleptocracy.  That is pretty much all I have to say right now.  Thanks again :)