From William Bond:
Hi Rasa
I have also wondered why people with crazy ideas like that of Alex Jones & David Icke have a strong following while are more reasonable ideas that women should rule the world and that God is female are rejected. And thinking about it, I think the problem is our lack of power.
Patriarchy is supported by people because they see it as powerful. After all men have been ruling our world for thousands of years and today all religions are patriarchal religions. So in the end the people will support the winners and that has been patriarchy. So it is a catch 22, people will support matriarchy if is shows it is powerful, but it can only be powerful if people support it.
So I think your
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.webp)
.webp)
Good question –
why we can’t move ahead faster. It’s frustrating. I think we are moving closer
to Female Dominance so slowly that right now it’s hard to see it, like a condition
you don‘t notice until it stares you in the face.
We cannot even
begin to see Matriarchy until the leadership in a country is over the 50% mark.
That percent is EQUAL but being that women are by nature superior to men – the
dreadful thing happens as soon as they have equality the scales will tip in
their favor & they will begin to dominate.
The reason it’ll
take so long is men have been working on their system thousands of years, to
squash women down. It’s a strong system. So it will not take thousands but
hundreds of years to reverse it, which if you look at it that way, it’s not too
long.
You mention
Patriarchal religion. I shared so many videos with statistics of how all the
major Patriarchal Churches are shutting down – including th Catholic Church.
They are antiquated, obsolete, & n one wants to listen to their bullshit
any more. Religion is the FOUNDATION of Patriarchy - its ideology! The main
reason is the uprising of women – but they don’t see it that way. So big changes are occurring. People don’t
even realize what’s happening, but it’s happening. Rasa
Pete Jackson steps in:
Very true what you say, Rasa.
Getting there really is a slow boat to
As the joke I often like to say:
MAN: "You know, honey, we did win nearly every single
battle of the gender war."
WOMAN: "Yes, I know, dear. And that's also
irrelevant. Remember, you can win every battle and still lose the
war. In fact, you already lost the war before the war even began."
William Bond reveals:
Yes, I agree, Rasa, that
patriarchal religions are in decline because of corruption, sex-scandals and
the attack by atheism. Unfortunately, patriarchal religions have given God a
bad name and atheism makes use of this. We can see this in books like, “The God
Delusion”, by Richard Dawkins who takes the worst aspects of patriarchal religions
to disprove the existence of God. So we do need matriarchal religions to
demonstrate that god is not as portrayed by patriarchal religions, but She is a
loving God who cares for us all.
Another problem with
patriarchal religions is that they discourage any communication with God. We
see this in Islam which states, “There is no God but Allah, and Mohammed is his
ONLY prophet.” So because they claim Mohammed is the only prophet of God anyone
else claiming to communicate with God is condemned as a blasphemer.
Christianity also discourages communication with God, you can get away with it
if you are a priest and don’t say anything controversial. But if you are not a
priest and a woman and claim to talk to God or spirit, then at one time she can
be condemned as a witch and burnt at the stake. It’s true that Joan of Arc got
away with claiming she talked to God for awhile, because she supported the King
of France. But even she was captured and sold to the English, who then burnt
her at the stake as a witch.
In
This is why patriarchal
religions don’t encourage communication with God, because women make far better
mediums than men and they don’t want female mediums, contradicting the
teachings of patriarchal religions. But this won’t be a problem for matriarchal
religions who will want to speak directly with God. This will make matriarchal
religions popular with the common people who also want to be able to talk to
God and will welcome the chance to do this through mediums in matriarchal
churches.
So matriarchal religions can
restore the good name of God which has been denigrated by patriarchal
religions. And they can also make it possible for the people to communicate
with God once again and receive Her help and guidance.
Witchcraft Act of 1735 was not repealed until 1951!
Helen Duncan
(1897–1956) was a Scottish medium famously convicted under the Witchcraft
Act of 1735 in London in April 1944, becoming the last person
in Britain to be imprisoned under this law. During WWII, authorities feared her
seances, where she produced "ectoplasm," could reveal national
secrets, such as the D-Day plans.
Key Facts About the 1944 Trial:
·
The Arrest: Following a
·
The Charges: She was tried at the Old Bailey
for "pretending to exercise or use human conjuration" (fraudulent
spiritualism).
·
Wartime Concerns: The prosecution
was heavily motivated by national security concerns, specifically that she
might reveal the secret plans for the upcoming D-Day landings.
·
The Sentence: Convicted on
·
Churchill's Reaction: Prime Minister
Winston Churchill was famously unimpressed, calling the case "obsolete
tomfoolery".
Despite being branded a fraud by many,
she maintained a devoted following, notes
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-18456106 BBC News. Her conviction, which
occurred right before the Allied invasion of
From Rasa to William & Pete,
Yes
indeed, God is not bad nor does She cease to exist because of the sins of
mankind – what a thought, how ridiculous. People are evil, religion is stupid,
therefore there is no God. The most stupid thing is the person who wrote that.
One can see the decline
of Patriarchal religion in more than one way; yes – the Catholic Church is
sickeningly corrupt. It’s been demonic since the middle ages – Iron Maiden
& all that. Simony, nepotism, living in luxury & debauchery while
holding down poor people making them believe they are the bad guys.
Atheists have from the beginning, also, attacked religion as in
spite f its evils many get savedl
Then finally the
sex scandal:
The
The first item has been
overwhelming sine the Middle Ages. The second item has been since the beginning
of Patriarchy. The third item is recent & has a definite point of origin
which you can believe or dismiss, whatever you want – but I caused it through 3
months of activities & prayers – Things such as I had never done in my life
& never will again, as explained elsewhere.
But there is a fourth
factor: women.
{internet :} “Historically, Catholic and general
Christian church attendance has skewed female, with women often comprising
55%–58% of congregations. However,
recent 2025 data shows a significant reversal in the
·
Global Context: Despite the
shift in some
Statistics show
percentage wise men are increasing because women are decreasing – It is
primarily the WOMEN who are leaving these Churches.
And it is they – not
the men – that bring the family, children to Church & into the Patriarchal
religion which they are now NOT DOING.
I have shared many of
the videos that present the facts that the Christian {Patriarchal} Churches
across
Even those Mega
Churches that looked so powerful:
{internet :} “World-famous male and
female mega church televangelists have utilized television and digital media to
build global ministries, often promoting prosperity theology or charismatic
movements. Key figures include Joel Osteen, Benny Hinn, and Kenneth Copeland
(male), alongside prominent female leaders like Joyce Meyer & Paula
White-Cain.”
But instead of growing
– they are declining:
{internet:} “Mega-churches
are experiencing a decline in the
Rasa
says - Reasons, reasons, reasons. Everything but the truth.
Just like the end of the Cold War & Communism, they give a bunch of reasons, all except my speech before
the White House June 16, 1978 – where Our Lady of Fatima’s Power was released;
Like
they claim female body buiding was started by the Feminist movement, when in
fact it started from my Esquire & Playboy articles.
So
the FACT of these Churches declining is as plain as the nose on your face,
which you can’t see: Women are sick of the bullshit of men, men telling them
what reality consists of, the difference between good & bad, how we should
behave, dress, what lifestyle we follow. We finally had enough. We could see
the writing on the wall & it said,
“Woman,
you are our slave – you follow us”
and
we piss on that wall & in the New Religion I say, “Woman, Thou Art God,” –
worship the God within. God is in you. Follow your own instinct, zeitgeist,
rules, make your own choices, decide for yourself what life is about & how
to live it.”
And
so I now conclude Wiliam & Pete, the REASON the Churches of America are
DYING is because they are Patriarchal & Patriarchy is on its way out, while
Matriarchy is coming in. Yes, slow, yes, no one is talking about it – yes it’s
not on the table. It isn’t time to be OPEN about it for the majority, but the
prophets – like us can shout it from the rooftops. The ‘Age of Kali’ is over,
their grip is not completely flax but it is loose.
A seismic
shift takes time, but it does happen. Evolution is not instant but it takes
place - look at the signs. Religion is one of them. When women are in power we
worship God as Mother, when men took over they changed it to Father & the
female priesthood to male. They changed the rules, the concepts like sex - Sex
was Sacred – they made it dirty & forbidden to women while men did what
they wanted as they were in charge. See how that has disintegrated? ‘Me too’ & sex scandals? Actually started
in 1983 with the Manhattan Beach Child Care Center, CA.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMartin_preschool_trial
There were no convictions but years
later they did find a TUNNEL under the school which children had talked about
but no one until later had ever found!
The abuses apparently took place on the other side of that tunnel. I saw two different accunts – One is this –
About parents who ordered a more thorough digging:
I also saw many years ago a former head
of FBI in Los Angeles {a video on the internet, saw it around 2007 or earlier}
who said he commissioned a dig, found a tunnel, & on the other side was an
area outdoors where things could have taken place. It looked like a ritual abuse altar or stage.
They were on their way to building something new & the entire evidence was
buried.
This case began the American hysteria of
accusing child care centers & individual men for child abuse - some legit,
some not. But it brought attention to the issue – although there seems to be a
COVER UP in this case, {it was really botched up in the way they questioned
kids also} it did start people wondering about men & child abuse & here
it was in
Back to the original subject, the
downfall of man’s religion is the beginning of females creating their own. Now
I know why Mother God told me in 2019 to get to it. I was slow, she pushed me.
I am to help women find their own way, their own feet, their own vision. They
have to start somewhere, so the New Religion & Order will give them a
start. There aren’t many places they can go for a breath of Female Empowerment,
are there? {End} Rasa Von Werder
From William Bond:
Hi Rasa
I think one of the reasons why
patriarchy has survived for so long it that they have successfully eliminated
all opposition to it. So now, even though people can clearly see the faults of
patriarchy they find it hard to come up with a credible alternative to it. We
see this with atheism, yes, it so easy for atheist to point out all the
contradictions and stupidity of patriarchal religions but what they have to
offer instead, is not much better. They claim our universe and life on Earth
was created by a accident and so we live in a pointless and meaningless world.
So they offer very little hope for our world.
The only real alternative to patriarchy
we have seen in recent years is feminism and it has been very successful in
empowering women. But it doesn’t challenge the patriarchal status-quo as it
claims men and women are the same and the end result is that feminist think
that if women want power they have to act and behave like patriarchal
men.
From Rasa: OK feminism is the only answer? The
only world known, famous/recognized answer but you might have included my
efforts in the website “Woman Thou Art God” & the book of the same name in
2019 & dozens of articles on my website & blog re the New Religion for
Women. This is not universally recognized but it has had a major impact in some
ways. The movement Femen in the Ukraine comes directly out of the
website “Woman Thou Art God” with women jumping onto Cathedral altars topless
with writings on their chest “I am God” - & they demonstrated topless next
to Prime Minister Putin – at Muslim male gatherings, jumping on stage half
naked & all that. Don’t sweep me under the rug. I don’t sweep you under the rug although you
are not world famous. I give you credit for being a prophet & although you
are not in the mainstream you have influenced many people, such as Pete &
myself – we follow in your footsteps so there is an impact. Rasa
William: It does seem to me the Catholic Church
has two choices. It either continues to decline or does what some Protestant
Churches do and allow women priests. This must be a big problem for the
Catholic Church hierarchy because when they look at what is going on in the
Church of England. It is clear that by allowing women to become priests, it is
allowing women to take over. This may be more of a problem for the Catholic
Church because they worship the Virgin Mary. Women priests in the Catholic
Church may identify with the Virgin Mary and attract women back into the Church
by venerating the Virgin Mary even more.
Rasa says: They call it veneration of Holy Mary,
not worship, but it’s basically the same They do not give her credit for being
God, but Jesus is the one & only God in their religion, She a mere mortal –
they stress that & the present Pope, ‘Lame Leo’ has stripped her of some
honors like ‘Co-Redeemer’ & ‘Mediatrix of all Graces” with Jesus. In my
religion Jesus & Mary are equals, both God, as are all legitimate Gurus
& Avatars. All Enlightened souls have the right to be called ‘God on Earth’
– although God is inside all creation, not all people manifest their God.
When we get my Church going, there will
be big dealings with the Virgin Mary & all female representations of God –
including the Hindu Goddesses. We will downplay too much masculinity &
feature the Feminine Divine.
PS There is no hope for the Catholic
Church, it cannot be reformed. Too late. As an Institution it is as dead as a
doornail, its days are numbered. Rasa
William: I
think the Mega Churches are missing a trick and forget why the Christian Church
was popular with the common people. The reason is that Jesus taught that God is
a loving God and he demonstrated in his own lifetime that he was a very loving
person. I know many Christian preachers do talk about love but they don’t mean
it and the people are not fooled by it. They need to learn from Princess Diana,
the establishment were shocked by how popular she was with the people after she
died. But the reason for her overwhelming popularity was that she was a woman
of high status who genuinely loved the people. Her love wasn’t a fake and the
common people were aware of this. So I think the people are crying out for a
religion of unconditional love with a God who loves us all and of course it
makes more sense to have a loving God who is female, rather than male.
Rasa: Yes, Diana was a symbol of love & kindness, that is
why she was loved. You realize I got her out of Purgatory? She was there 28+
years, my book “Royals Ascend into
Heaven” is a free PDF on my website.
William: I
think one of the reasons why patriarchy is dying is that we are now in the age
of information. In the past, priests could get away with corruption and the
abuse of minors, but it’s not so easy today to do this. Patriarchy today is
being exposed for what it is and it’s becoming impossible to cover it up. So
there is a opening for women if they can forget about trying to act and behave
like men. If women can follow their maternal instinct and behave like genuine
caring and loving people and not get involved in corruption or the abuse of
power. Then the people will want women like this to rule over them or be
priests in their religions.
Rasa: That is one way of looking at it, but remember, it is a
contradiction to what you yourself said. You have said that instead of women
continuing to love men, forgive them, be soft on them, they should stop &
teach men to love. It’s a question of what is love? How do you express it,
manifest it? Women have loved men too much & hated themselves & their
sisters – which is what men wanted. This type way is shown us in the myth of
Durga/Kali – a true myth, a prediction of what is to come. The 3 male gods could
not control the demon Mahishasura {Patriarchy!}
Durga
transforms herself into Kali
{internet:} In Hindu mythology, Goddess Durga transformed into the
fierce form of Kali to destroy the demon Mahishasura, who was terrorizing the
celestial realms and was invincible to men. This transformation occurred when
Durga's rage culminated during the battle, symbolizing the need for destructive
energy to annihilate evil. Kali, emerging from Durga's forehead, brought a more
destructive, intense aspect to the fight, often associated with annihilating
clones or the demonic nature of Mahishasura.
Key Aspects of the Transformation and
·
The Cause: Mahishasura, a shape-shifting
demon, caused chaos, leading {Rasa: male gods} gods to invoke the divine
feminine energy to stop him.
·
The Transformation: In the Markandeya
Purana, Kali emerges from Durga's forehead, embodying her intense
wrath and bloodlust, acting as a more powerful, destructive, and fierce aspect
of Durga.
·
The Conflict: While Durga is often depicted as
the ten-armed slayer of Mahishasura (Mahishasuramardini), the transformation
into Kali specifically represents the divine force required when the battle
becomes dire and requires ultimate destruction to ensure victory.
·
Symbolism: This transition highlights the
adaptability of the Divine Mother—moving from the protective/nurturing Durga to
the destructive/fierce Kali to restore balance.
·
Victory: The battle
lasted nine nights and days, ending in the victory of good over evil,
celebrated as Navaratri and Vijayadashami. ……………………………
Rasa continues:
In the beginning, Durga appeared with beauty & seduced
Mahishasura, but over time this did no good as more & more of these demons
appeared - his bloodline perpetuated. This is what’s happened on earth – we’ve
given in to men, worked on our beauty, seduced them, & produced more &
more demons – the part of their population that always rises to the top, while
nice guys finish last. And finally, the only way we can win is go back to square
one – the myth says male extinction. She destroys their bloodline – laps up
their blood! This is a long time hence, the ultimate solution but meanwhile it
encourages women to be forecefu rather than soft.
Now you William are preaching we not be like men – we should
love. Not dicks in skirts. Which is it? Be loving or stop loving & teach
them to love? It seems too late to teach them to love, they are too far gone –
you cannot teach a demon; they are unredeemable, they will never repent. You
can only do exorcism on them – remove them.
You yoursef have said that men see only winners & losers
& they do not believe in equality. How do we become winners? Take a look at
what Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. did with the blacks in the South. He was not
soft. He used action, activity, strong words, strong marches, sit ins & the
like. They refused to go on buses that made them sit in back. They stood
against police & fire hoses. They prayed on steps of government building,
they marched into white neighborhoods, they were beaten with clubs, some died.
They did things the blacks never had done before – it was hard, it was
dangerous. They showed love for THEMSELVES where
previously they cowered & gave into the white man. It was passive
aggression, like Ghandi.
What demon conquerers love is sweet, kind, passive people. These
they can rob of all their resources, like the Conquistadors did to the Indians
& Aborigines & all defenseless peoples.
What bothers me is first you preach women to move ahead &
teach men to love, then you preach women to be nurturing, maternal, kind
hearted, not dicks in skirts while they struggle their way into politics. Which
is it?
The truth is - Being passive, feminine, nurturing will have men
seeing us as they always have in the past – suckers, easy pickins’, ready to be
exploited, there for the asking, scared rabbits, unable to defend ourselves.
No, we have to stand arm & arm with sisters like the blacks
did, sing together in our Churches {our homes} ‘We shall overcome’ – watch our
sister’s back – not compete for the Massah but kick his ass. There are many
ways. I am sure that Sarah Mullally has not been a passive, frightened female.
She must have fought her battles on the way up.
Yes, this is a war. It’s not an easy fix. The blacks in the
South were slaves for generations, conditioned to fear the white man. The
Hindus in
Women have been suppressed longer than that – thousands of
years. And it isn’t going to be an overnight fix. Even though we are superior
we are like the big elephant that was taught since a baby that that chain &
spike in the ground is enough to hold him. He believes in that chain &
spike & he doesn’t pull it out. But some day, sooner or later he will.
I tried to show women their strength in ‘Woman Thu Art God’ –
the website that proves female superiority. Ashley Montagu wrote a book about
it, 1953. Dr. Bryan Sykes has proven male extinction in 2004 – but all of this
has not been enough. The work goes on.
Rasa
William Bond continues: Just
one think I forgot to mention about Helen Duncan, the prosecution claimed she
was a fake medium. Yet the irony is that they reason why she was arrested was
because the authorities feared that because of her psychic abilities she would
reveal more war secrets. If she was a fake, like they claimed, the authorities
would have ignored her, in the time of war. William
Rasa: Of course, William, it was a frame up. Lock
her up so she can’t spill the beans re D-Day, then let her out, say whatever
she wants, lol.
Hi Rasa and Pete
I just wrote about women taking over the
Church of England and this is now being confirmed.
Sarah Mullally has become the first
woman to serve as Archbishop of Canterbury, officially confirmed in a legal
confirmation service at
So it means women are taking over the
Church of England but how successful they will be depends on how they behave.
It they are like female politicians and act and behave like, “dicks in frocks”
then nothing will be achieved. But if they follow their maternal instincts and
act and behave like caring, loving feminine women then they might save the
Church of England. William
Just to add another bit I saw
about Sarah Mullally as the new Archbishop of
The appointment marks a historic
milestone for the Church of England, though it has drawn criticism from
conservative factions within the global Anglican Communion who oppose women in
Episcopal roles. Mullally, a former Chief Nursing Officer for
I really hope she means what she says about justice,
inclusion, and compassion. William
How is the Archbishp of
The Archbishop of
Canterbury is chosen through a
multi-stage process led by the Crown
Nominations Commission (CNC), a Church of England body that shortlists
candidates, sends recommendations to the Prime
Minister, who then advises the Monarch (King/Queen)
for formal approval, and finally, the College
of Canons at Canterbury Cathedral elects the chosen candidate,
followed by royal confirmation.
The CNC, comprising various church and diocesan members, interviews candidates,
selecting one or two names for the Prime Minister, who forwards the preferred
choice to the Monarch for final, formal appointment.
Why
did the previous Archbishop of
Justin Welby resigned as the Archbishop of Canterbury on
His resignation was driven by his
failure to act on allegations against John Smyth, a
prominent Christian lawyer who subjected over 100 boys and young men to
"brutal and horrific" physical and sexual abuse over four decades.
Here is a breakdown of what Justin Welby
was accused of and what he was found to have done wrong:
Key Failings and Accusations
·
Failure to Report to Authorities: The Makin
Review found that from August 2013, shortly after Welby became Archbishop, the
Church of England knew "at the highest level" about the abuses, yet
failed to formally report them to police in the UK or authorities in South
Africa.
·
Lack of Curiosity and "Cover-up": The review
highlighted a "distinct lack of curiosity" shown by senior church
officials, including Welby, and stated that the church’s response was
"wholly ineffective" and amounted to a "cover-up".
·
Delayed Action: Although Welby was informed of the
abuse in 2013, he did not take sufficient action to ensure a robust
investigation, allowing Smyth to continue his abuse in
·
"Personal and Institutional Responsibility": In his
resignation statement, Welby admitted he "personally failed" to
ensure that the claims of abuse were investigated properly. He initially
resisted calls to resign, but faced mounting pressure, including a petition
signed by over 14,000 people and calls from senior bishops.
The John Smyth Scandal
John Smyth was a barrister who ran
Christian summer camps in the 1970s and 1980s, where he beat boys with a garden
cane. The abuse was "horrific," with victims receiving hundreds of
strokes, sometimes causing them to bleed and need medical attention. After
being exposed internally in 1982, Smyth moved to
Context of Resignation
·
"Too Busy": In a later
interview, Welby expressed that the sheer scale of safeguarding issues—another
case among many—meant he did not act with the necessary urgency, though he
conceded this was "a reason – not an excuse".
·
Failed to Meet Victims: Welby
apologized for failing to meet with victims of Smyth's abuse quickly, only
doing so years after the 2017 documentary that brought the abuse to public
attention.
·
"Deep Sense of Shame": Welby noted
that the findings of the review renewed his "long felt and profound sense
of shame at the historic safeguarding failures of the Church of England".
The Archbishop of York, Stephen
Cottrell, and other church figures labeled his resignation "the right and
honourable thing to do" to allow the Church to move towards a more
victim-centered, independent safeguarding approach.
Who
is Sarah Mullally? {internet:}
Dame
Sarah Mullally (63) is the 106th Archbishop of Canterbury, confirmed on
Hi Rasa and Pete
I've
just looked up the first women to become a Church of England priest.
Angela Berners-Wilson is
recognized as the first woman ordained as a priest in the Church of
England. She was ordained on
This means it just took over
30 years for a women to obtain the highest position in the Church of England. I
wonder how the Roman Catholic hierarchy thinks about this? Do you think it will
make them frighten to allow women priests.
William
Rasa: Yes, men are
scared to death of the Power of women – that’s why they have worked so hard to
stop them.
A Rejoinder from William Bond
Hi Rasa
I just like to answer your criticism of
my support for loving feminine women. Yes, I know the Suffragettes, Gandhi and
Martin Luther King used passive aggression to empower themselves but they all
worked within the patriarchal system. I think we need to challenge the whole of
patriarchy and replace it with matriarchy.
Yes, I agree patriarchy has taken over our world and ruled it
through force, violence, intimidation and indoctrination. But the question we
have to ask ourselves, do we really want to be ruled by cruel, violent and ruthless
men? Yes it’s true the way to achieve wealth and power in our patriarchal world
is to be assertive and ruthless but teaching women to act and behave like
patriarchal men, is not going to make our world a better place.
If we want to live in a more loving and compassionate world we
have to invoke the power of love. Love is far more powerful than we think.
People claim that money rules our world because people need money to buy things
and survive and if we have lots of money we can buy power and influence. But
there is something else we all want, even more than money and that is love. We
all want and need love and if given a choice of living in a world of conflict,
fear and hate or in a loving and caring world, we of course want to live in a
loving world. So if that’s what we all want, why don’t we work together to
create a loving world? Because patriarchy tells us that this is impossible. We
are told only competitive, assertive and ruthless people are able to gain
wealth and power and in this cruel world, “nice guys come last”.
But but is this true? Is it possible for loving people get to
rule our world? The answer to this is simple: If we are to ask people which
type of rulers would you prefer? Ruthless, selfish and corrupt men who only
care about themselves and are willing to start wars for the most trivial of
reasons. Or would you prefer to be rule by loving and caring women who
genuinely care about the people they rule? Any sensible people would far prefer
loving and caring women rule them.
But the reason why we don’t have caring women rule our world is
that patriarchy has sold us a lie and that is, “love is a weakness”. But this
is not true, as I have recently learnt. My wife is 90 years old and last year
broke her wrist in a fall and so I have had to care and look after her. I’ve
never had to do anything like this before in my life and found out just how
hard it is to care for someone who has been disabled. I found it physically,
mentally and emotionally very stressful. Yet billions of women are caring for
others all over the world and we all take it for granted. And these women have
to be very tough to work long hours working in the caring industry.
So this is the choice we all have. Do we want to be ruled by
ruthless, selfish and corrupt men or loving and caring women? But if we want to
be ruled by loving women how do we get them into positions of power? We can
only do that by refuting patriarchal lies. The point is that the vast majority
of people do not want to be ruled by selfish, corrupt and lying politicians.
But we have to accept this because no matter who we vote for, we still end up
with a lying politician. So people become cynical and say things like; “How do
we know when a politician is lying,” answer. “When you see his lips moving.” Which
all suggests we are locked into a system where change seems to be impossible
and the patriarchal system wants us to believe this.
When we look at the patriarchal system we see that the worse
types of people get into positions of power. But do we really want to live in a
system like this? Of course not, any sensible people do not want this. So in
theory, all the arguments for matriarchy has to be overwhelming favourable but
modern female politicians throw away this big advantage by believing the patriarchal
lie that; “love is a weakness”. So they act and behave like male politicians
and become as corrupt and deceitful as what they are. So they fall in the
patriarchal trap of never allowing people the choice between caring and loving
women rulers and selfish and corrupt male rulers.
Love is never a weakness when people are given the choice of
being ruled by loving and caring women or selfish, uncaring and ruthless men.
Women cannot compete against men for power by being assertive, violent and
deceptive. They have to use feminine power which is the power of love and
compassion. This is why we need a matriarchal movement so people know about
this and if we can get enough people interested, then we can give people the
choice of uncaring and corrupt patriarchy or loving and caring
matriarchy.
Also, men are not encouraged to learn how to love when they see
it as a weakness. While many men fear love because they believe if they learn
how to love they will become soft and weak. But if we have loving rulers who
are in positions of power because they are loving people. Then men will then
realize that love is not a weakness, and will want to learn from women how to
love.
Another point is that on a spiritual level, love in the power of
the ONE. The universe is unite by love, so the universe is feminine in nature.
Because a masculine universe would break apart and become chaotic because the
masculine represents competition and aggression and cannot unite within itself.
So love in the most powerful force in the universe as it is the power of unity
and order.
From Rasa to Answer the Previous
Hi
William! That is a thousand word article! I cannot answer it all today as the
last two days I neglected many things to create the article ‘Women Taking Over
Religion.’ I want to do other things today. But I will ponder this, & here
are the issues that should be clarified:
What is love?
How is love
employed in time of war, when the enemy has all the advantages, such as laws in
their favor, culture that says they are right, & a police force &
military to push people into compliance?
Did Martin Luther
King Jr. employ love in the Civil Rights Movement? How would you describe his
love? How was Rosa Parks using love when she refused to sit in the back of the
bus - was arrested, fined, & she & her husband both lost their jobs.
Explain her love.
How was Mahatma
Ghandi using love when he taught his countrymen to stand up to the British.
Many Indians were killed – even massacred by the British military. In the end,
he himself was martyred. How was he using & teaching love? Explain this
love.
We are asking
here how does the underdog – the one defenseless, the one pushed down, use love
in the lifting up of themselves & getting free from an oppressor?
Sure, we all want
loving & kind hearted leaders. Sure, we all want to be loved, accepted, tolerated,
treated fairly – but how do we get up from the heel of the oppressor pushing us
down – the tyrant who has no love, but the desire to use & exploit us at
any cost & will even kill us for seeking freedom? How do we use love to get
away from this oppressor, turn around & become the kind, benevolent leader? Can you answer this?
Oh yes, & explain what exactly is a
‘dick in skirt’ or ‘dick in frock?’ What
does she do, how does she act, & how should she act to be loving? Like if
an enemy strikes her country should she say,
“No, don’t fight back. We love them. Let
them do what they want to do.”
The twist is that for those who are
leaders today - like Margaret Thatcher who you called a dick in skirt – they
work in a
Rasa
.jpg)
.webp)
No comments:
Post a Comment