The Sisterhood Part
4 12-4-&5-22
The Matriarchal
Creed of our New Religion
I believe in God,
the Mother Almighty, Creator of heaven & Earth
And in Rasa Von
Werder, one of Her Daughters, & William Bond, one of Her sons, that they
were sent to earth to teach Female Empowerment, Matriarchy, & restore
worship of God as Mother.
I believe in Matriarchy, Female Empowerment & women running the family & the world.
From Rasa:
After perusing a
series of descriptions of CONTEMPLATIVE FEMALE Catholic convents/monasteries I
came to the conclusion that some of them fit into this category:
From
Wikipedia:
The Diogenes
Club is a fictional gentlemen's club created
by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and featured in
several Sherlock Holmes stories, such as 1893's
"The Adventure of the Greek
Interpreter". It seems to have been named after Diogenes the Cynic (though this is never
explained in the original stories) and was co-founded by Sherlock's indolent
elder brother Mycroft Holmes.
The club as
described by Sherlock Holmes in "The Adventure of the Greek
Interpreter":
There are many men in
The
convents are tiny, usually housing 1 to 9 women at most. They do not reach out to the world, they have
no separate doctrine from the Catholic Church & they live under the
auspices of it. Often you see an image of the nuns surrounding a Priest, who
presumably is their LEADER or the one who authorizes their existence, certainly
hearing their confessions & providing them with the HOLY EUCHARIST which
they themselves feel they cannot consecrate.
There
is nothing here that can inform me, teach me or inspire me in the work that I
must do to empower women & bring forth a religion positive to the female
gender & its authority, in fact, they present a sorry example of compliance
to Patriarchy. I move on from them.
About
Gerald Gardner, founder of a modern day Wicca movement from Wikipedia:
Gerald Brosseau Gardner (
{There are also other forms of Wicca, called Dianic Wicca
or by other names}.
This example exonerates the male gender from participation
in the founding of our religion/Sisterhood, pointing out that gender alone is
not the criteria for establishing us. We
have many men that have helped formed our religion including the likes of Jesus
Christ, all his great Saints, Buddha & all his great saints, & many
other men who believe/ed in Matriarchy, Female Empowerment & right now, my
two best friends, William Bond & Pete Jackson, are of this number.
It is important to stress the SPIRIT of Matriarchy, as
taught by Jesus & others, which is the Spirit of Divine Motherhood, that of
loving & caring for others. Whoever
espouses this Spirit is a Matriarch, a Christian, a Buddhist, Good Wiccan or
Pagan or any other religion that is Good as taught by these Great Souls.
Jesus taught Matriarchy overtly & distinctly, he even
cited he wanted to be a Mother Hen to his followers, the baby chicks under his
wings.
Buddha taught his followers to pray daily for ALL SENTIENT
BEINGS & that INCLUDES ANIMALS. I am
all for that.
Gerald Gardner promoted a religion rooted in the ancient
days when women ruled the world. He had
to scrounge to find traces of Wicca/Paganism not wiped out through the
Patriarchy, its Inquisition, & its Patriarchal Academics. All the Patriarchal Institutions – religions
& Universities, have been enemies of Female Empowerment & the
Matriarchal agenda. They have sought to
wipe out all traces of HER-story & those who wish to restore it must dig
deep. Gerald studied, researched &
participated in ancient cults in order to understand what once had been.
Yes he was a man, not a woman. Why didn’t a woman do what he did? Shall we blame him for that or simply accept
him as a Matriarch?
Here is a distinction:
a Matriarch is recognized not by the body but by the Spirit. Some men are more Matriarchal than some
women. I had many women enemies s-
believe it or not – trying to separate me from William Bond, claiming he had to
submit to THEIR authority! And they
disrespected him instead of kneeling at his feet doctrine wise. Here William is the Prophet of Matriarchy,
& they were attacking him.
They also, of course,
attacked me vehemently out of jealousy, the crazed thought that I was ‘trying
to take over’ & they deserved accolades more so than I. These women who attacked either William or
myself were NOT Matriarchs. Call them
whatever you wish, but they did not assist Female Empowerment.
When it came time to
REAL WORK on our agenda, the women became SCARCE. When it was time to take the dole, they were
all over the place. They stood in lie
when I handed out praise & attention to them. When it came time to do research, write
articles, build websites, they disappeared.
One is following in my
footsteps, & I am proud of her work.
But she has distanced herself from me – I have no idea why.
Bottom line is men can
be more Matriarchal than women, they can help, they are helping. But that doesn’t mean that men can, in
general or at random, influence this doctrine toward Patriarchy. We make a fine distinction between help &
infiltration, between sincere members & agents provocateur.
This will require great
discernment & it will come from the Holy Spirit.
There will be men, even
agencies, with all kinds of offers. Some
of these will be sincere, some not so.
Beware of Greeks bearing Gifts. The
famous ‘Trojan Horse’ was built with soldiers inside, when the city carted the
horse in, the soldiers popped out, attacked & defeated the citizens.
There are those who
want to join, infiltrate, suck up, flatter, lie, to get inside our heads, our
lives, our Order, with only the intent of using us or even betraying us.
For example, a female
who intends to make money from Scandal Sheets might join our Order for a
‘visitor’ status, to see if she wants to be a ‘nun’ or Matriarch.
She stays two weeks
only to SPY & find every detail she can to TWIST it against our favor, the
minutest molehill will turn into a mountain, ridicule & contempt are her
goal.
How do we know such a
person before we let her in? Discernment
– prayer.
“By their fruits he
shall know them”
I have had many people
on social media who wanted to be ‘friends’ with me, but these friendships
carried a PRICE TAG. In the end, it is
THEIR NEEDS not those of the Religion, the Order, the Cause, the Matriarchy
they were after. They wanted to use my
prestige, fame, status in the community, to build themselves up, for what
reason I’m not even sure.
They wanted the
so-called GLORY, not the sweat & blood, the REWARDS, not the pain.
What is the sweat &
blood & pain & what are the rewards?
They imagined accolades, respect & love. Lol. There is a dearth of that. You work & your rewards are in HEAVEN, the eternal sphere. When you die your radiance in Heaven will be brighter than it would have been. There isn’t any Heaven on Earth, there will always be pain, if you’re waiting for that, you will find dirt in your mouth at the end of the rainbow.
Doctrine of the Matriarch Religion
What we MUST believe
even though there is a soft boundary between ourselves & many other
religions, there will be points where there is an IRON FENCE between us &
them.
Here is where we will
not change. In any point of doctrine
where Patriarchy assumes leadership or puts women down or stands above women,
we reject that completely. Any system which
in any way wants to lead women, be above them, have greater rights, claims that
God is a man, that the Priests have to be men, etc, we reject all that.
For example, Mormons
might be wonderful people & we love them for loving God. But when they say their founder saw some sort
of writing that no one could read but him & this writing told him men
should be leaders & have multiple wives, forget that. That is against us.
And Jehovah’s
Witnesses, they are wonderful people & we love them. But when they say women cannot preach in
Kingdom Hall, & all the leaders are men, we defy that doctrine & say
this is not for us.
And the cults like
Mennonites & Hutterites which are all-male leaders & Patriarchs, some
of them might be saints, but we reject Patriarchal Societies.
Then, what does a
Matriarch {the name of our New Religion} have to espouse? {BTW, this is written by Rasa Von
Werder. Where William Bond has
differences of opinion, you choose which one you wish to follow, but the
Sisterhood must believe Rasa Von Werder’s version.}
I That God is a Mother God, Her symbol is
female & rightfully so because the woman is the egg & reproductive, the
sperm is not
2
That females should run the family & the
world. That men have done a terrible job
of running the world & should step aside.
3
That human men are going extinct. They are a ‘genetic experiment that did not
work & nature is removing them.’ It
will be a woman-only world in 100k years or so, women will reproduce without
men, the offspring all female. {See the teaching of Dr. Bryan Sykes, world’s leading
geneticist, on this} {Rasa Von Werder
gives her theory elsewhere how men evolved & became negative as shown in
the myth of Lucifer-to-Satan with one third of the angels following him into
Hell}
4
That animals are Sacred & should not be
exploited in a cruel manner or hunted for sport. That vegetarianism &
veganism should be encouraged, that humans who eat meat should eat less of
it. Animals that are housed for human
exploitation will be monitored for good conditions, the most humane housing,
feed & treatment. Animals deserve
freedom, happiness & fulfillment as much as humans do. We are another species of animal, ‘Whatever
you do to the least of these you do to Me’ says God.
5
Children
should be breast fed up to 6 years, when the immune system is fully developed.
Women should not have a second child until the first is weaned, after six
years. To have serial pregnancies causes
trauma in a child because they have to be weaned & the mother pays less
attention to the first toddler. Serial
pregnancies are forced upon women by men, it has caused overpopulation &
disastrous consequences to our planet.
{See the teachings of Dr. Bryan Sykes on this in his book “Adam’s Curse
– A Future Without Men} The care,
raising of children should be managed by women only, as they have the instinct
for it, they should not surrender the authority over their children to men, -
they are designated by God & biology to be the caregivers. Child abuse is primarily caused by males –
this must be addressed seriously. Women
must have financial independence from men to take care of the children without
them if they are abusive to them or the children.
6
Sexuality – In general, sex between consenting
adults is not a sin. However, there
could be instances of sin during sex, to be decided by God alone, not society,
as God knows the hearts & minds & circumstances. Anything, even a biological act, committed to
hurt someone can be a sin. Nudity is
also perfectly innocent, unless someone is using it unfairly, such as a man
exposing himself to a woman or child against their will. Think like a nudist, do not be scandalized by
nudity in general, it does not represent immorality.
Let us take note that the sex laws &
attitudes have been aimed primarily against women. Women are free to do with their bodies as
they wish, no man can dictate what to do, what is moral or immoral, that she is
less of a human because she chooses t have many partners. She is FREE.
7
Reproductive rights are purely the decision of
the female. She should use birth control
of any type when she wishes to. Abortion
is up to her, but to be avoided by using birth control whenever possible,
especially condoms. In our Sisterhood,
women are sexually free but we want to protect them as parents protect their
daughters. We plan to screen the men who
want to be in association with us & cohabit with our members, to make sure
our Sisters are not hurt. But if Sisters
want to ‘have fun’ by having sex with any men they choose, they are
allowed. We hope they stay within the
community & their children will be a part of our Religion & Sisterhood.
Catholics & Muslims have used child bearing
as a way of increasing their numbers, successfully so. The Catholic Church heinously forbids birth
control, in an age when AIDS exists & women can be killed by it. We reject their rule. Muslims do not allow birth control at all –
there are no condoms sold in
When we disregard the ‘nuclear family’ as the
idea & try living as Sisters, as both William & I agree, child rearing
becomes more easier. Obviously, a woman
can leave the community & go out, be it work, shopping or recreation, &
leave her children in the care of Sisters.
You can’t do this in a nuclear family.
The male might be working, he could be dangerous alone with the child,
or he could be just incompetent as a care giver. No, in a nuclear setting, the woman is
strapped & imprisoned by children. A
Sisterhood is strongly empowering to a woman.
8
A
woman must believe in HERSELF, that God is within her, that she has authority
over herself, her life & her children. She must walk like a Godess, talk
like a Godess, act like a Godess. She
must have dignity & pride. And she
cannot afford to be ‘feminine’ in the bad sense of the word, as that is what
they want, for us to be weak, passive, wishy washy, dependent, submissive &
soft. If we want to be feminine in the
POSITIVE way, gentle, kind & caring, we can only afford to be so in the
company of men who are gentlemen or model people, the rest will SLAUGHTER us –
like they slaughtered the Indians, Aborigines & Indigenous Peoples.
A woman
MUST RESPECT HERSELF & OTHER WOMEN.
She must not be in conflict or competition with them – the ‘slave
mentality.’ We are NOT slaves of men, we
are capable of taking care of ourselves but we must BELIEVE in ourselves &
OUR GOD.
Excellent work, Rasa! This came out great overall, and I will be sure to share it far and wide. I will add comments later.
ReplyDeleteBest wishes and keep up the great work,
Pete
Very well said overall. I would like to add that when it comes to sexuality, there are really only two hard and fast rules that are needed for consenting adults: 1) enthusiastic consent regardless of gender, and 2) whoever has the yoni makes the rules. Anything else is basically superfluous, and can be covered by general ethical principles.
ReplyDeleteI was thinking. For the optimal weaning age of children, and by extension the optimal spacing between children, the ever-insightful Dr. James W. Prescott's research of numerous Indigenous cultures around the world would also generally agree on principle, though there he seems to put the dividing line at 2.5 to 3 years for weaning instead of 5 or 6 years per Dr. Bryan Sykes. So which is it then? While 5 or 6 years seems to be the ideal, it seems in practice that most of the benefits can be had at 3 years or so, which is still head and shoulders above the abysmal status quo in "modern" society that has been down the rabbit hole for so long. Thus, 2.5 to 3 years should be regarded as the minimum, in a modest concession to modernity, while 5 or 6 years is still the ideal. But truly anything longer than the pitifully low average of the status quo is at least some sort of progress towards what Prescott calls "societies of peace".
ReplyDeleteJames W. Prescott's website for his research:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.violence.de/