Monday, 25 November 2019

XXXXVI UNDERGROUND RAILROAD



                        MALES OPPOSE HUMAN RIGHTS -

THEIR CONTROL OF A SOCIETY BRINGS MISERY & DEATH.  WORST ARE MUSLIM COUNTRIES.  WE HAVE TO HAVE AN UNDERGOUND RAILROAD FOR GETTING WOMEN OUT OF THERE.

                                                                Rasa Von Werder


Just saw a brilliant documentary on Afghanistan.  Twenty five years ago they were forward & progressive.  Women had no sexual repression – they were encouraged to wear mini skirts, go out drinking, meet men, have fun.  This showed pictures of the women – beautiful – wearing gorgeous modern clothes.  They worked in all areas of life – went to school, had no restrictions in jobs or family life.

But now this says everything has reverted to the bad old days, before twenty five years ago – the  prior freedom has been forgotten or ignored.  The law, on paper (recently), gives women equal rights.  But the culture, in the streets, is an ancient theocracy where women are killed, by their own father (even with the totally ‘progressive’ family who sponsored the documentary crew-a mom, dad & daughter) if they shame/dishonor the family.   (And what constitutes shaming the family?--Having a boyfriend even if they are not doing sex, walking on the street with her face uncovered, or in some cases going to school or working.) This is it:





        The young (looks twenty) interviewer (honey blonde hair to her waist, was constantly reminded by her hostess to cover her hair--later had to wear a burqa, which is a sheet covering the entire body with a bad net over the eyes & nose--she stepped in horse shit, couldn’t see, was afraid to step in front of a car, got a headache, felt faint--the burqa made her physically ill.  She put a camera inside it & really you had about half your vision blocked off.  Why couldn’t they just make a net, I thought, that you could see through?  This net was thick, like strands an 1/8th of an inch thick.)

        Her hostess was from a progressive family.  She got educated, got a doctor degree & now works for ‘doctors without borders’ for 1k a month – a huge amount for an Afghan.  With this money she helps her family (three sisters, a brother & parents) & for this she is ‘treated with the status of a man.’

        But she can’t have a ‘personal life.’  She fell in love with a guy from Kabul – he agreed to her freedom, she could work & not wear the burqa (btw today by law they do not have to wear it, but most women do because of severe reprisals from society, family.  She is suspected of being a  ‘prostitute’ if she shows herself without cover.)

        Ms Doctor had a man she loved who promised her she could keep her freedom.  But her Mom said to her,

        “If you go with this man, before you do, put a little poison in food for myself & your Dad, & you will be free.”

        When Doc insisted, Mom got a hypertension episode, had to be taken to the doctor & there was the threat of her getting a heart attack.  Ms Doc had to drop the man, cried for three days.  What was the Mom’s objection?

        “In Kabul it will not be like he says it is.  If you are free, it will get back to the family & shame us.”

        The sisters – all women – are desperate for normal freedom, to walk the street & shop with their faces bare so they can see.  This is forbidden--By men of course.  And boys – little kids – begin enforcing this with little girls.  Girls ten years old were asked to show their wedding party outfits – the 10-12 yr old boys stood in the way saying no – no, no.

        The eighteen-year old brother of the three sisters said if he had his way, none of them would get an education or walk bare faced ever.  (There are situations where the hostess & interviewer went places bare faced, – seeing officials she interviewed, a female head of government, a female professor in a college & a male chief of police – they did not wear burqas for that.  But shopping in the city they did.

        The 18-yr old brother squirt said that the sister who became a doctor, he had been too young to intervene – he was sorry she went to school & became a doctor & now works.

        The men often promise freedom while they’re preparing for marriage, (although there are few meetings alone, if any,) but later they take it back.  In this special, ‘progressive’ family one female is allowed to see her fiancĂ© alone (they did not explain under what conditions, like were they completely alone or chaperoned from a distance.)  But as soon as they get engaged or even worse married, they ‘change their minds’ & she is NO LONGER ALLOWED TO LEAVE THE HOUSE, WITHOUT HIS PERMISSION – NO SCHOOL, NO WORK.

        What this ‘culture’ is-- pure & simple, is male control of women, suspension of their human rights, males as masters, women as slaves.  The males who promise they will not enforce this ‘culture’ on women after they marry reneges on the promise. If a female or even her SISTER wants to go on a trip – the man threatens divorce.

 Sure, it’s more convenient for them to have a slave than an equal.  Sure, you have to get my permission to leave the house.  Good for the man, who cares how she feels?  Sure, you cover yourself head to toe so no man can see you, you can’t then attract any man.  Sure, you aren’t allowed to go to school where you might meet people & God forbid know more than me,  sure, you can’t work where again you’ll meet people, meet men, will earn money you could hide & escape from me.  You must stay barefoot & pregnant, a little slave under my feet, completely at my mercy & if you do anything against me I can kill you with impunity – just like a slave – the law in these Muslim countries never rules against men, only women.

        Speaking of which, to divorce his wife a man only has to say three times ‘I divorce you,’ but a woman has to go through rigmarole in court to get a divorce.

        One female here, a woman with four children had this complaint – her husband brought other men into the house to have sex with her for money.  In other words, he was a pimp forcing her into prostitution.  The judge granted her a divorce, but he would not pay her the divorce fee.  He also wanted one of the children to live with him – probably intending to pimp them out.  The judge did not permit this until the child got older – they were all under nine years old.  How could a judge grant a child this sleazebag?  Isn’t the child in danger?  Of course it is, but men are God’s here, they can do no wrong even when they kill.

        How can you argue with a society that allows men to kill with impunity – for shaming them?  Of course it is illegal, but do they enforce it?  Is the man arrested, jailed, condemned to death or life?  No, I’ve never heard of a man being punished in these countries for brutalizing or killing women or children.  This is Patriarchy at its worst – the way it used to be before feminism.  No wonder Mother God is MAKING MEN EXTINCT – how can women fight against this, because the fight itself invites murder.

        They were discussing, with the siblings, if they could march in the street protesting.  They said no, no way – it would shame the family - & you know what that means.

        I felt such pity for the Doctor Lady.  She was condemned, without a husband, to live forever with her family.  She would never have a husband, children, a life of love, unless of course she quit being a doctor, married one of these monsters & agreed to serfdom.

        Here women gain all their ‘status’ & ‘identity’ through their husband & children, without this they are considered FAILURES & REJECTS like unwanted trash – not good enough for a man (haha, not good enough for a scumbag.)  And even if she earned the money she does, SHE CANNOT LIVE ALONE.  This was not discussed or explained, but I guess a woman living alone is also ‘a prostitute’.  Males would probably break into her home, gang rape her, murder her & walk away righteously.

        This is what males are like – this is ‘male culture’ – Patriarchy.  Not all males are evil, so I am told, so I believe but they ‘good guys’ are swept along with the worst of them to enforce these rules against women.  They might not be the rapist, but they will stand on the side & let them get raped.  They are not like Jesus who INTERVENED at the stoning of the adulteress, using His God Power to figure out how to save her.

        Who could ever have thought of such a thing?  He said,

        “He who is without sin, cast the first stone.”

        Then he wrote in the sand.  Each man who came by to look, he traced out their secret sin or sins, each dropped his stone in fear & slinked away.  Soon there were no men, & Jesus said,

        “Woman, where are your accusers?”

        And he told her to

 “Go & sin no more.”

I always wondered, if she was caught in adultery “in the very act’ – where was the man?  He was in Saudi ArabiaAfghanistanIraq or any Muslim country with Sharia law.  These monsters & their monstrous ‘cultures’ existed in the ancient times & still today, & what can we do about it?  The women CANNOT PROTEST.  To protest even slightly means PUNISHMENT.

In Saudi Arabia King Abdulla, worth untold billions from oil, has imprisoned his four daughters  (they are movie-star gorgeous, their Mom was) by his second wife.  The wife has fled & is living in England, but the daughters stay all alone, in a crumbling villa padlocked from outside, without servants or amenities, & in interviews they say they are being STARVED TO DEATH.  What was their transgression?  They SPOKE OUT FOR WOMEN’S RIGHTS.

And their old Dad said there will be no respite when he’s gone – their brothers (one of whom is the Crown Prince) will continue the imprisonment & abuse.

These women can’t win no matter what they do – it’s too oppressive.

        It’s like the slaves in America say 1800 – Simon Legree & his brother.  They march up the plantation walk.  They protest in the local paper.  What do they get?  Beatings, maybe murder.  Children taken away, whipped, spouses raped, removed.  Anything is better; any imprisonment when you are 2/3rds human, not a genuine person, your master can do anything to you & with you.  Only outsiders can help – which they did.

        Now woman – you are God.  What can you do to help?  I suggest an UNDERGROUND RAILROAD – get these women out of there.

        Small numbers of females have escaped these countries – eighty to Australia – it took money, planning & huge risks.  Some didn’t make it.  One was detained at an airport – her relatives arrived.  The airline cooperated with the relatives.  They gagged her, masking tape over her mouth, hands & feet,  tied her up in a wheel chair, threw blankets over her as she tried to scream, & hauled her onto a plane to go back to where most likely she’d be killed.  The airline knew it, too, - why did they cooperate?  This is on You Tube:

        We need a new Harriet Tubman system, international, totally secret like hers was, a system where these women can get out of these countries.  There is no other way out for the time being.  Remember when ballet stars Rudolf Nureyev & then Mikhail Baryshnikov defected?  This is worse than that, much worse.  They have a system of tyrannical slavery of women that defies imagination.  How do we do it?  Harriet Tubman:

       
From Wikipedia:

Harriet Tubman (born Araminta Ross,  March 1822  March 10, 1913) was an American abolitionist and political activist. Born into slavery, Tubman escaped and subsequently made some 13 missions to rescue approximately 70 enslaved people, including family and friends, using the network of antislavery activists and safe houses known as the Underground Railroad.

RASA SAYS:  THIS IS WHAT WE MUST DO, SET UP AN UNDERGROUND RAILROAD OR MANY RAILROADS, INTERNATIONALLY, TO GET WOMEN OUT OF THESE SLAVERY COUNTRIES, WHERE SLAVERY OF WOMEN IS LEGAL  & TORTURE & MURDER OF WOMEN GOES UNPUNISHED.

 She later helped abolitionist John Brown recruit men for his raid on Harpers Ferry. During the American Civil War, she served as an armed scout and spy for the Union Army. In her later years, Tubman was an activist in the struggle for women's suffrage.

RASA SAYS:  WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE MEANS GAINING THE RIGHT FOR WOMEN TO VOTE.  IMAGINE, IN OUR ADVANCED CIVILIZATION, WOMEN COULD NOT VOTE.  THERE WERE NUMEROUS OTHER RIGHTS WE DID NOT HAVE EVEN INTO THE 1960’S – IVY LEAGUE COLLEGES WERE NOT OPEN TO US UNTIL 1964!

Born a slave in Dorchester County, Maryland, Tubman was beaten and whipped by her various masters as a child. Early in life, she suffered a traumatic head wound when an irate slave owner threw a heavy metal weight intending to hit another slave, but hitting her instead. The injury caused dizziness, pain, and spells of hypersomnia, which occurred throughout her life. After her injury, Tubman began experiencing strange visions and vivid dreams, which she ascribed to premonitions from God.

RASA SAYS:  THESE VISIONS INSPIRED & EMPOWERED HER ON HER JOURNEY TO BE THE FEMALE MOSES – SO CAN YOUR UNION WITH GOD EMPOWER YOU TO SAVE YOURSELF FROM PATRIARCHY, FROM THE LIMITATIONS OF THIS WORLD & ITS MISERY.

UNION WITH GOD GIVES A PERSON ‘SUPERNATURAL POWER’ & ONE NEEDS THAT KIND OF POWER TO DO THE WORK HARRIET TUBMAN DID & THE WORK WHICH WE MUST DO.

 These experiences, combined with her Methodist upbringing, led her to become devoutly religious.

In 1849, Tubman escaped to Philadelphia, then immediately returned to Maryland to rescue her family. Slowly, one group at a time, she brought relatives with her out of the state, and eventually guided dozens of other slaves to freedom. Traveling by night and in extreme secrecy,

RASA SAYS:  EXTREME SECRECY IS ALSO WHAT WE MUST EMPLOY.  EVEN IN THE BASICS OF OUR RELIGION, I SAID BEFORE & WILL SAY IT AGAIN & AGAIN, DO NOT TELL ANYONE WHERE WE MEET, WHO THE MEMBERS OF THE CHURCH ARE, ANYTHING WE DO IN OUR GATHERINGS.  MEN ARE NOT ALLOWED INTO OUR TEMPLES BECAUSE THEY ARE THE ONES THAT ENSLAVED US & WANT TO KEEP US THERE.  THEY PRETEND TO BE OUR FRIENDS BUT FEW ARE.  EVEN THOSE THAT ARE TRUE FRIENDS CANNOT BE TOLD ANYTHING WHEN THERE ARE PHYSICAL MEETINGS.

YES ANYONE CAN JOIN THE RELIGION IN NAME ONLY, PRACTICE IT FROM AFAR, BUT NOT INVADE OUR SAFE SPACE UNLESS THEY ARE  FEMALE MEMBERS.

WE MUST BEAR IN MIND THAT THERE WAS A WAR – IN THAT WAR MALES DEFEATED OUR FREEDOM THROUGH VIOLENCE, TORTURE, MURDER & THREATS OF IT.  TRUST NO ONE.  EVEN GOOD GUYS, IF THEY KNOW TOO MUCH, CAN BE HARASSED OR HELD BY THREATS BY THE WICKED ONES TO REVEAL WHERE WE ARE, THEN THEY COULD COME & GET US.

 BATTERERS HAVE BEEN KNOWN TO GO TO BATTERED WOMEN’S SHELTERS WHERE THE AUTHORITIES ALLOWED THEM IN—JUST BECAUSE ONE WAS A COP--& THE COP CONTINUED TO INTIMIDATE & BEAT HIS WIFE FROM THERE ON IT.  SHE SNAPPED & PAID SOMEONE TO KILL HIM.  OF COURSE, SHE WAS PUNISHED WITH LIFE.

WHEN THIS RELIGION REALLY STARTS SERIOUSLY, NOT ONLY ON PAPER, YOU MUST EMPLOY IT AS DID HARRIET TUBMAN HER UNDERGROUND RAILROAD.

THE SLAVE OWNERS ARE SERIOUS.  THEY WILL TEMPT WITH REWARDS.  PEOPLE WILL TAKE THOSE REWARDS & BETRAY US.  I WILL PROBABLY BE NO LONGER ALIVE WHEN THIS GETS GOING BUT I SPEAK TO YOU IN EARNEST TO TAKE MY WARNINGS SERIOUSLY.

THIS IS GENDER WAR.  THEY ACT NICE WHEN THE BOAT IS NOT ROCKED, BUT ONCE YOU ROCK THE BOAT THE DEMONS IN THEM COME OUT.

Tubman (or "Moses", as she was called) "never lost a passenger". After the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was passed, she helped guide fugitives farther north into British North America, and helped newly freed slaves find work. Tubman met John Brown in 1858, and helped him plan and recruit supporters for his 1859 raid on Harpers Ferry.

When the Civil War began, Tubman worked for the Union Army, first as a cook and nurse, and then as an armed scout and spy. The first woman to lead an armed expedition in the war, she guided the raid at Combahee Ferry, which liberated more than 700 slaves.

RASA SAYS:  WE WILL ALSO LIBERATE MANY,  ONE, TWO, DOZENS, HUNDREDS, THOUSANDS & EVENTUALLY MILLIONS OF SLAVES.  THIS CAN ONLY DONE WITH THE GRACE OF GOD.

 After the war, she retired to the family home on property she had purchased in 1859 in Auburn, New York, where she cared for her aging parents. She was active in the women's suffrage movement until illness overtook her, and she had to be admitted to a home for elderly African Americans that she had helped to establish years earlier. After her death in 1913, she became an icon of courage and freedom.

Escape from slavery

In 1849, Tubman became ill again, which diminished her value as a slave. Edward Brodess tried to sell her, but could not find a buyer. Angry at him for trying to sell her and for continuing to enslave her relatives, Tubman began to pray for her owner, asking God to make him change his ways. She said later: "I prayed all night long for my master till the first of March; and all the time he was bringing people to look at me, and trying to sell me." When it appeared as though a sale was being concluded, "I changed my prayer", she said. "First of March I began to pray, 'Oh Lord, if you ain't never going to change that man's heart, kill him, Lord, and take him out of the way.'" A week later, Brodess died, and Tubman expressed regret for her earlier sentiments.

RASA SAYS:  NOTICE THAT AS A WOMAN OF GOD HER PRAYER TO KILL A MAN WAS RATIFIED.  GOD DOES EMPLOY HER WRATH ON HER ENEMIES WHEN NECESSARY.

As in many estate settlements, Brodess's death increased the likelihood that Tubman would be sold and her family broken apart. His widow, Eliza, began working to sell the family's slaves. Tubman refused to wait for the Brodess family to decide her fate, despite her husband's efforts to dissuade her. "There was one of two things I had a right to", she explained later, "liberty or death; if I could not have one, I would have the other".

Notice in the Cambridge Democrat newspaper offering a $100 reward (the equivalent of $3,000 in 2016 currency) for capture of each of the escaped slaves "Minty" (Harriet Tubman) and her brothers Henry and Ben.


Tubman and her brothers, Ben and Henry, escaped from slavery on September 17, 1849. Tubman had been hired out to Dr. Anthony Thompson (the son of her father's former owner), who owned a large plantation in an area called Poplar Neck in neighboring Caroline County; it is likely her brothers labored for Thompson as well. Because the slaves were hired out to another household, Eliza Brodess probably did not recognize their absence as an escape attempt for some time. Two weeks later, she posted a runaway notice in the Cambridge Democrat, offering a reward of up to $100 for each slave returned.  Once they had left, Tubman's brothers had second thoughts. Ben may have just become a father. The two men went back, forcing Tubman to return with them.

Soon afterward, Tubman escaped again, this time without her brothers.  She tried to send word of her plans beforehand to her mother. She sang a coded song to Mary, a trusted fellow slave, that was a farewell. "I'll meet you in the morning", she intoned, "I'm bound for the promised land." While her exact route is unknown, Tubman made use of the network known as the Underground Railroad.

This informal but well-organized system was composed of free and enslaved blacks, white abolitionists, and other activists. Most prominent among the latter in Maryland at the time were members of the Religious Society of Friends, often called Quakers. The Preston area near Poplar Neck contained a substantial Quaker community and was probably an important first stop during Tubman's escape. From there, she probably took a common route for fleeing slaves – northeast along the Choptank River, through Delaware and then north into Pennsylvania. A journey of nearly 90 miles (145 kilometers) by foot would have taken between five days and three weeks.

Tubman had to travel by night, guided by the North Star and trying to avoid slave catchers eager to collect rewards for fugitive slaves. The "conductors" in the Underground Railroad used deceptions for protection. At an early stop, the lady of the house instructed Tubman to sweep the yard so as to seem to be working for the family. When night fell, the family hid her in a cart and took her to the next friendly house. Given her familiarity with the woods and marshes of the region, Tubman likely hid in these locales during the day. Particulars of her first journey remain shrouded in secrecy; because other fugitive slaves used the routes, Tubman did not discuss them until later in life.  She crossed into



Pennsylvania with a feeling of relief and awe, and recalled the experience years later:

When I found I had crossed that line, I looked at my hands to see if I was the same person. There was such a glory over everything; the sun came like gold through the trees, and over the fields, and I felt like I was in Heaven.

RASA SAYS:  AS HOW YOU WILL FEEL WHEN YOU DISCOVER NONDUALITY.  YOU WILL KNOW THERE IS A GOD, & SHE IS YOU.

GO FORTH, WOMAN GOD, FIND YOURSELF, THEN SAVE OTHERS.


        To be continued   Rasa Von Werder   11-26-19


XXXXV PSYCHOPATH PATRIARCHAL LEADERS


 by William Bond



comments Rasa Von Werder & Ajax the Great…..originally aired  4 30 14     Additional comments  11-25-19



If we want to understand why we live in a world of conflict — wars, violence, abuse, poverty and suffering, then we have to go back to basics.  What is undisputed is that men rule our world and have done so for thousands of years.  Male-rule is what feminists call patriarchy – masculine rule – and masculinity (as defined in our present society) is aggression, force, violence and intimidation.

AJAX THE GREAT: Absolutely true indeed.  Truer words were never spoken.


RASA:  LET ME JUST ADD HERE THAT ALL THE STATISTICS – EDUCATIONAL AND EMPLOYMENT WISE, ARE POINTING TO WOMEN RISING, MEN FALLING BEHIND. THE FUTURE IS WOMEN, IT IS MATRIARCHY. HOLD ON, KEEP PRAYING AND BELIEVING, WOMEN WILL RULE THE WORLD, MEN WILL FALL. THEY ARE GOING EXTINCT. THEIR OWN ACTIONS HAVE BROUGHT DEATH UPON THEM.
AJAX SAYS:  Indeed, Women are rising, while men are falling away and falling apart, and have been so for a while now.


RASA SAYS:  THIS BEGS, FOR ME, A NEW DEFINITION OF “MASCULINE.”  I POSIT AS A MASCULINE MAN, FOR INSTANCE, SAINT REV. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.  THERE WAS A REAL MAN, WHO RISKED HIS LIFE TO SAVE OTHERS, AND GAVE HIS LIFE AS JESUS DID.  I READ HIS BOOK “THE STRENGTH TO LOVE,” WHICH WAS ABOUT LOVING THOSE IN SPITE OF THE FACT THEY BOMB YOUR HOUSE.  HE KNEW THE MEANING OF LOVE, HE WAS STRONG.  THAT’S A REAL MAN, OR A REAL WOMAN.  BULLIES ARE NOT REAL MEN, THEY ARE COWARDS, THEY ARE WEAK, CRUEL, AND THEY WILL BE REMOVED AWAY LIKE “THE CHAFF WHICH THE WIND BLOWETH AWAY”.  THEY ARE ALL BLUFF AND BLUSTER, BUT IN ETERNAL LIFE, THEY HAVE NO SUBSTANCE EXCEPT BURNING IN HELL.

AJAX SAYS:  Indeed, bullies have what is now known as "toxic masculinity", which is detrimental to everyone, and they are also cowards.  They are certainly not real men!


We can see this in the way male animals behave in the rutting season.  Every spring animals like bulls, rams and stags fight each other for dominance and access to females.  In these fights the winner takes all, the biggest and strongest males gain access to all females, while the weaker ones get zero.  A successful stag is not only bigger and stronger, but aggressive, ruthless and selfish.  Sharing with other stags is not an option; there can be only one winner who takes everything for himself.

RASA SAYS:  YES, INDEED, GOOD ANALOGY.  HOWEVER, I TAKE NOTE THAT ANIMALS KILL BY THEIR INSTINCT, TAKE HAREMS THROUGH VIOLENCE, BUT THERE IT ENDS.  HUMAN MALES ARE NOT ANIMALISTIC, BUT “SUBHUMAN,” AS THEY NOT ONLY FOLLOW INSTINCTS BUT THEY ARE SENSELESSLY SADISTIC.  ANIMALS DO NOT RAPE TINY ONE DAY OLD BABIES (AND MANY ARE KILLED) OR SMALL INFANTS….THEY DO NOT PLAN MURDER, THEY DO NOT DO “GENOCIDES.”  THEY DO NOT, IN ORDER TO GAIN PLUNDER, WIPE OUT THOUSANDS OR HOPE TO MURDER MILLIONS.  THEY DO NOT USE THEIR MINDS TO CREATE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION SUCH AS ATOM BOMBS, INVENTION OF AIDS PUT SECRETLY INTO VACCINES; THEY DO NOT PLAN TO MICROCHIP MILLIONS AND USE THEM AS SLAVES, THEY DO NOT CREATE CONCENTRATION CAMPS WITH OVENS READY TO EVAPORATE PEOPLE AT 2,500 DEGREES.  THEY DO NOT SKIN OTHER ANIMALS ALIVE TO GET PAID FOR THEIR PELTS.  THEY DO NOT PLAN FRANKENSTEIN CROPS LIKE GMO’S NOR DO THEY PLAN TO MAKE HEALTHY FOODS ILLEGAL.  HUMAN MALES HAVE TAKEN THIS INSTINCT TO THE POINT OF DEMONIC SUCH AS HAS NEVER EXISTED – THAT IS WHY MOTHER GOD IS RENDERING HUMAN MALES EXTINCT.
AJAX SAYS:  Very well-said, Rasa.  Indeed, sub-human or demonic is the best way to describe such evil and sadistic behavior that goes way, way beyond natural instincts.  And even many of those who are not so extreme are still willing to lie, cheat, steal, and even kill for filthy lucre.


We see the same in patriarchal societies.  The vast majority of the wealth and power of any country is possessed by a small minority of people.  Like rutting stags, the winner takes all, while the losers, the poor, get “the crumbs from the rich man’s table”.  Men, also like stags, are violent, because the boundaries of any country are decided by war.  For this reason, all countries have to have a strong military against invasion.

AJAX SAYS:  There are in fact more than enough resources in the world for everyone on this planet to have a decent standard of living, yet poverty and extreme inequality remain.  Why?  Patriarchy features winner-take-all economics, and reverse Robin Hood economics.  Rob from the poor, give to the rich, and torpedo what's left of the middle class until there are only two classes left:  master, and serf.  And plenty of violence and war, which enriches the oligarchs.


In contrast, as the late great Buckminster Fuller once noted, the feminine paradigm of leadership would reject men's outdated, inane, and insane self-fulfilling prophecy that war and scarcity are somehow inevitable.

Until then, mechaninzation is no match for the Machiavellian machinations of the moneyed elites--most of them MEN.

RASA:  IT IS A PATTERN.  UNTIL AND UNLESS WOMEN TAKE OVER COMPLETELY THIS WILL GO ON AS IF BUT HALF THE WORLD IS PATRIARCHAL, THE OTHER HALF HAS TO HAVE ARMIES TO PROTECT THEMSELVES FROM THEIR VIOLENCE.
AJAX SAYS:  Very true.  Certainly, abolishing the military entirely would be very naive and foolish so long as other countries remain patriarchal and maintain their own militaries.  Though in the USA, we can certainly downsize by cutting our "defense" spending in half and we would still have the strongest fighting force in the world.  Because currently it is not used so much for defense, as it is wars of aggression for plunder and empire, to enrich the psychopathic oligarchs at the top.  See "War Is A Racket" by Major General Smedley Butler, truly a must-read for everyone. 


In any patriarchal society – where men dominate – we have the rule of force, aggression and violence.  If “masculine” people rule our world, then off course it is going to be a brutal where “might is right”. If we want a loving, caring world, then the only way to achieve this is to be ruled by loving and nurturing women.
The abuse of women and children is going to happen because they are smaller and weaker than fully grown men. Men use can use their greater size and strength to get what they want from smaller and weaker people.  The psychiatrist Sigmund Freud hinted at this in his Oedipus complex theory, where the son wants to kill his own father, and possess his mother.  The actual reason for this is probably that the son was being abused by the father and hates him.  He also wants to protect his mother from abuse by the father, but Freud wasn’t allowed to say this.  The tragedy of this is that the son, when he grows up, is likely to treat his own wife and children in exactly the same way.
Freud did write a paper on the physical and sexual abuse children suffered by their fathers and other male relations, but this paper was censored.  To save his career, Freud no longer posited the theories but only hinted at them.  Since then, things have changed with the rise of feminism.  Women are now able to assert themselves and take more control over the children.  As the result, men who beat their wives and physically/sexually abuse their children can now be sent to prison.  As women gained power, children were protected from male abuse.

RASA SAYS:  EXCELLENT POINT.  UNTIL WOMEN ARE EMPOWERED, THEY ARE LIMITED AS TO WHAT THEY CAN DO.  WHEN WOMEN GO TO THE JUDICIAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, IT IS POLITICIZED AGAINST THEM, IN FAVOR OF MEN.  I HAVE BEEN THEIR VICTIM.  WHEN A WOMAN IS RAPED, THEY BLAME THE WOMAN.  WHEN A CHILD IS RAPED, THEY REALLY DON’T CARE.  IF ALL THE MEN WHO RAPE WOMEN AND CHILDREN WERE PUT INTO PRISON, PROBABLY HALF OF ALL MALES WOULD BE INCARCERATED.  MALES STICK UP FOR OTHER MALES.  THE MALE POLICE PERSUADE WOMEN TO DROP CHARGES.  MALE DA’S WON’T PROSECUTE CRIMINALS FOR INJURING OR RAPING WOMEN – IT HAPPENED TO ME TWICE.  THIS IS CHANGING, BUT IT STILL EXISTS.  IN MANY COUNTRIES, WOMEN HAVE NO RIGHTS.  THEY ARE SLAVES AND THEY ARE SAVAGED.  LOOK AT THE THEOCRATIC MUSLIM COUNTRIES.
OBVIOUSLY, ALL THE STATISTICS PROVE WOMEN ARE RISING, MEN ARE FALLING.  BUT IT IS THE WESTERN WOMEN THAT ARE RISING, AND THEY WILL HAVE TO PICK UP THE REST OF THE WOMEN IN OPPRESSED COUNTRIES.  IT WILL TAKE TIME.  WE WILL DO IT.
AJAX SAYS:  Indeed, having male leaders in charge of prosecuting male violence against Women and children, is like the fox guarding the henhouse.  The "good ol' boy" network is all too real, as is the victim-blaming mentality.  Things are slowly but surely improving in that regard, with significant declines in rape, domestic violence, and child abuse statistics since the early 1990s, but we still have a very long way to go before we are anywhere close to a truly "civilized" society.  Women really need to take over.  Yesterday.


The more males dominate a country, the more violent it becomes, as women, children and other men suffer violence, rape and abuse. In such a brutal world we end up with psychopaths running everything, as they are the most vicious and brutal.
An example of this would be Saddam Hussein, who ruled Iraq from 1979 to 2003.  He became the leader as being a psychopath and had no qualms about killing or torturing people.  In the eyes of many this made him a strong leader.  In fact, people now claim that the people of Iraq suffer more from violence, since he was deposed by the USA, than while he was in power.  This is because without a strong brutal leader, in this extreme patriarchal county, law and order has broken down.  The whole of history is full of leaders like this, who take power and hold on to it, through violence and brutality.
Unfortunately, psychopaths not only exist in extreme patriarchal countries but in more moderate, democratic countries.  In their book, “Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work”, by Paul Babiak, Ph.D., and Robert Hare, Ph.D.  They point that in business, psychopaths are far more likely to be successful.  The reason is that they have the ‘right’ qualities to succeed in a male dominated world.  To quote. –
“Several abilities – skills, actually – make it difficult to see psychopaths for who they are. First, they are motivated to, and have a talent for, ‘reading people’ and for sizing them up quickly. They identify a person’s likes and dislikes, motives, needs, weak spots, and vulnerabilities… Second, many psychopaths come across as having excellent oral communication skills. In many cases, these skills are more apparent than real because of their readiness to jump right into a conversation without the social inhibitions that hamper most people… Third, they are masters of impression management; their insight into the psyche of others combined with a superficial – but convincing – verbal fluency allows them to change their situation skillfully as it suits the situation and their game plan.”
This doesn’t only apply to businessmen; you only have to look at successful politicians to see the same thing.  A politician in a patriarchal system has to be able to appear on TV and tell lies without any hint of shame or embarrassment.  This means that being a psychopath is a big advantage in patriarchal politics.
Men off course invent all sorts of excuses to justify why we live in a world of injustice and violence.  Patriarchal religions like to blame the Devil for all the harm men do.  The big problem with this idea is that if God has created everything, then he made the Devil as well.  So why would God make a person like the Devil, who opposes him?  Religion also tries to blame women as well, in spite of the fact women are far less violent and far more caring than men.

RASA SAYS:  MY OPINION OF THE DEVIL AND SATAN IS THE ORIGIN IS MEN, IT COMES FROM THEIR PSYCHE, THEIR ID.  THEY HAVE UNLEASHED THE MILLIONS OR BILLIONS OF DEMONS ON THIS PLANET.  IT COMES FROM THEIR LOWER CHAKRAS AND INSTINCTS.  BUT THEY ARE WORSE THAN ANIMALS, THEY ARE SUBHUMAN, AS I ALREADY SAID.  IT IS NOT ALIENS, IT’S HUMAN MEN.  IF IT WAS ALIENS, WOMEN MIGHT BE AFFECTED – BUT THEY ARE NOT.  WHY ONLY MEN?  THE ALIENS ARE THE FALL GUY, THE EXCUSE, THEY ALWAYS HAVE AN EXCUSE.  THEY TRY TO USE ANIMALS AS EXCUSES, THAT WE ARE VIOLENT AS THEY ARE.  BUT OUR CLOSEST COUSINS ARE THE BONOBOS.
AJAX SAYS:  That makes sense.  According to Paul Levy and Jack D. Forbes, it is the "wetiko" mind-virus, the parasite of the mind and cancer of the soul.  Essentially the same thing as Satan and demons.


CONSIDER THAT, WILLIAM BOND.  INDEED THERE ARE BULLS AND STAGS.  BUT OUR GENEOLOGY IS CLOSEST TO BONOBOS.  THEY ARE MATRIARCHAL, THEY ARE HORNY, FRIENDLY, THEY SOLVE ALL CONFLICTS BY TOUCHING AND FEELING.  THE MOTHERS RULE THE FAMILY AND SOCIETY, AND THEY ARE STRONG, AND THEY POSTURE, BUT THERE IS NO WAR.  WHEN MALES INTIMIDATE FEMALES, THEY ARE MOBBED AND PREVENTED BY SEVERAL FEMALES, THEY CANNOT DOMINATE.
AJAX SAYS:  Indeed, "make love, not war" is essentially how the bonobos live.  That, and like the Robin Morgan quote, "sisterhood is powerful".  We can really learn a lot from them.


Science tries to justify men’s selfishness and violence onto “evolution”.  They claim that the violence of male animals is “survival of the fittest”; where the strongest and fittest males get to breed the next generation of animals.  They totally ignore the female’s role in evolution.  The fact is that the mother gives birth and cares for the young, and this is a far more important role in the survival of any species, than what males do.

RASA SAYS:  WHAT A BRILLIANT POINT WILLIAM HAS MADE, THAT EVOLUTION IS NOT JUST ABOUT MEN, AS MEN WANT US TO BELIEVE.  THE BEHAVIOR OF THE FEMALE WITH HER OFFSPRING IS MORE IMPORTANT!
AJAX SAYS:  Brilliant indeed, as usual, William!  You really hit the proverbial nail on the head.  Even Darwin himself was apparently not a Social Darwinist at all.


Conspiracy theories try to blame secret societies like the Freemasons, the Illuminati or even alien reptiles for the ills of our world.  The rich tend to blame the poor and the poor blame the rich, but few people will acknowledge the fact that as it is men who are ruling our world, then the problem must be male rulers.

RASA SAYS:  ABSOLUTE LOGIC, ONCE AGAIN, OF WILLIAM BOND.
AJAX SAYS:  BINGO.  Psychopaths/sociopaths are completely ruthless since they have no conscience, and since the patriarchal paradigm rewards ruthlessness and aggression, then psychopaths/sociopaths will be the ones who inevitably rise to the top under male rule.


It must be obvious that any system that puts psychopaths in leadership positions is a bad arrangement.  Yet, this is what patriarchy does all the time.  Men are naturally aggressive and competitive, and this is not a real problem if they are kept under control.  Unfortunately, when men rule our world the most violent, aggressive or devious men end up in positions of power.

RASA SAYS:  SURE, IF WILLIAM BOND OR JESUS CHRIST RULED OUR SOCIETY WE’D HAVE A PEACEFUL AND LOVING WORLD.

AJAX SAYS:  True.  And Ajax the Great as well.


Patriarchy also breeds psychopaths.  It has been discovered that many psychopaths had appalling childhoods.  A case in point would be Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Saddam Hussein – all of whom were beaten mercilessly as children.  Extreme patriarchal cultures encourage this, as they claim that abuse, “toughens up” boys and turns them into ‘real men’.  Certainly turning a man into a psychopath makes him a good soldier, as he can kill without mercy.  A more ordinary man is not such a good soldier, as he has qualms about killing the ‘enemy.’

AJAX SAYS:  So very true, William!  And you can add Pol Pot to that list (by his ruthless teachers) as well.  It seems that "beating the devil out of 'em" is really more like beating the devil INTO 'em, which is what the sinister agenda of the demonic patriarchy really wants to do to turn boys, and thus men, into cannon fodder and "Good Germans" at best, and subhuman demonic zombie killers at worst, to do the bidding of the psychopathic oligarchs at the top. 


RASA SAYS:  GOOD POINT.  BEING BRUTAL AND VIOLENT TOWARD MEN MAKES THEM SO, AND THEREFORE, OUR WORLD ENCOURAGES VIOLENCE THROUGH ALL MEDIA; GLORIFIES IT.  THEY HAVE EXCUSES FOR THIS AS “ENTERTAINMENT,” AND “FREEDOM OF SPEECH,” BUT IT’S MORE THAN THAT.  THEY WANT TO BREED DEMONS – MEN WITH NO FEELINGS WHO KILL WITHOUT MERCY.

If we do not want to be ruled by psychopaths then the obvious solution is for women to rule our world.    It is known that psychopaths can be created by extreme abuse, and in a patriarchal society where women are physically smaller and weaker than the average male, they are far more likely to suffer abuse of all kinds.  Yet, in-spite of this, there are still far less female psychopaths then male.

RASA SAYS:  ANOTHER GOOD POINT THAT I FIRST HEARD FROM WILLIAM BOND.  THE SAME ABUSE/VIOLENCE ON WOMEN DOES NOT ENGENDER THE SAME REACTION FROM WOMEN AS IT DOES MEN.  IT’S THE DIFFERENCE IN THE BRAIN, THE INSTINCT.  WOMEN HAVE A STRONGER INSTINCT TO GIVE LIFE, MEN LESS SO; THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE THE PROTECTORS SO THEY HAVE MORE VIOLENT TENDENCIES; BUT THESE MUST BE TEMPERED AND GUIDED RIGHTLY, NOT RUN AMUCK.

AJAX SAYS:  I am not sure how much of this is nature versus nurture, but I would hazard a guess that it is a mixture of both.  Genetics loads the gun, environment pulls the trigger.


So it makes sense for us to be ruled by caring and nurturing females rather than aggressive males.  We can see all over the world the more women are oppressed the more violent societies become.  But in countries where women are empowered society is peaceful.  When women are powerful, everyone benefits – bear in mind how brutal men are to other males.  Abusive fathers appear in elite families as well as poor – men such as Stalin, Hitler and Saddam were brutalized.
The only way to overcome all these problems is to have women take over.  It is true, there are caring men, but the psychos rise to the top — What psychopaths do is take acting lessons in how to appear loving and caring, then they are elected.

AJAX SAYS:  So true.  For thousands of years, the "good guys" have proven wholly incapable of defeating the bad guys on their own.  If us fellas could do it, we would have already done it long ago.  Even when a particularly notorious mass-murdering genocidal dictator like Hitler was defeated, that was achieved with the help of another, equally evil dictator, Stalin, who only gained strength afterwards and subsequently turned against the Allies after we no longer had a common enemy in the Nazis.  Only Women can truly defeat all of the bad guys for good.


RASA SAYS:  YOU CAN SEE LIARS ON TOP OF ALL GOVERNMENTS PRETENDING TO BE HELPING PEOPLE, AND THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THEIR LIES.  IT HAS HAPPENED NUMEROUS TIMES IN HISTORIES.  TAKE KIND HEROD TELLING THE MAGI TO LET HIM KNOW WHERE JESUS IS BORN SO HE TOO, CAN GO WORSHIP HIM.  THEN HEROD SENDS OUT HIS SOLDIERS TO KILL ALL THE BOYS UNDER THE AGE OF TWO.  HE EVEN DUPED THE WOMEN TO BRING THE CHILDREN TO HIS HEADQUARTERS SO THEY COULD BE FETED – THEY BROUGHT THEM ALL DECKED OUT IN GARLANDS OF FLOWERS, WHERE THE SOLDIERS STABBED AND SPEARED THEM TO DEATH.  AND WHAT HAPPENED TO HEROD AND ALL THESE MALE LEADERS WHO KILL SO MANY PEOPLE?  THEY GET WHAT THEY DESERVE EVENTUALLY BUT USUALLY ON EARTH, THEY, LIKE THE GODFATHER, DIE OF OLD AGE.  BUT THE INNOCENT ARE KILLED.  SO MUCH FOR JUSTICE ON EARTH, CERTAINLY DOESN’T EXIST IN A PATRIARCHAL WORLD.
AJAX SAYS:  They give with one hand, and they take with the other.  And they take plenty of lives in the process.


Yes, there are ruthless and deceiving women as well, but not in the same numbers as men.  Women have a powerful maternal instinct and once this instinct is activated then she not only wants to love and care for children of her own, she has the same desire to care for other people’s children, to look after the sick, old people and animals.  If we look at violence, we find that men commit over 99% of all acts of violence.  The reason is that because as women bring life to our world and want to nurture it, so it is harder for women to be cruel and uncaring for others than with men.
The competitive and aggressive instincts of men make them totally unsuitable to rule our world; they instigate conflict, war and injustice.  The maternal/ nurturing instincts of women enable them to run the family and the world – A world ruled by women would be fair, loving and caring.
by William Bond…..comments Rasa Von Werder….. 4 30 14

RASA SAYS:  LET ME JUST ADD HERE THAT ALL THE STATISTICS – EDUCATIONAL AND EMPLOYMENT WISE, ARE POINTING TO WOMEN RISING, MEN FALLING BEHIND.  THE FUTURE IS WOMEN, IT IS MATRIARCHY.  HOLD ON, KEEP PRAYING AND BELIEVING, WOMEN WILL RULE THE WORLD, MEN WILL FALL.  THEY ARE GOING EXTINCT.  THEIR OWN ACTIONS HAVE BROUGHT DEATH UPON THEM.

FINAL THOUGHTS:  Can I get an AMEN?  So very true indeed.  We are all ruled by an oligarchy of a few hundred to a few thousand cold-blooded psychopaths and sociopaths at the top.  And that is the logical conclusion of patriarchy, basically.  Worse, even if they are deposed, these evil villainaire rulers will ultimately return if we don't stamp out the conditions that cause such evil to rise to power in the first place.  Thus the better half of humanity, Women, must rise up and take over once and for all, Goddess willing.  Only then will there ever be true peace on Earth.