XXXI<>THE NEW RELIGION "Woman Thou Art God"<>Guest Author Ajax the Great

Why Sex Has To Be Expensive And Hard To Get (For Men, From Women) Under Patriarchy

(And how this ultimately serves and maintains the patriarchy)

One thing that not everybody fully appreciates is just how many levels and layers the patriarchy really has.  Like peeling an onion, when you dig in you just keep finding more and more layers.  And nothing about patriarchy has more levels and layers related to it than the topic of sexuality, which under patriarchy is quite a complex topic to say the least.

Patriarchy has had a very long history of repressing Women's sexuality.  And such sexual repression has been proven to do more harm than good, and essentially all of patriarchy's archaic and repressive rules about sex were designed to control Women. That was originally done so men could be at least somewhat certain of paternity, as descent was reckoned (and inheritances were passed) through the male bloodline, though with the advent of modern birth control and paternity testing such a reason has basically become obsolete.  Note the double standard of patriarchy in which Women are far more likely to be punished for sexual transgressions, and how men who sleep around are considered "studs" and "legends" while women who do so are considered "sluts" and "whores".  In contrast, Matriarchal societies have historically been far more sexually free in general, since knowledge of paternity was basically a non-issue as descent was reckoned through the female bloodline.

Additionally, patriarchy's rules against masturbation, homosexuality, and birth control are really a result of the fact that patriarchy is one big Ponzi scheme (and protection racket) that requires very high birth rates to keep it afloat.  Thus, anything that frustrates that goal is deemed sinful.  Patriarchy considers Women to be the brood mares, while men are the work horses.  And in today's overpopulated world, such rules are also obsolete as well.   In Matriarchal societies, on the other hand, overpopulation would never even have occurred in the first place as Women would have complete sexual and reproductive freedom, and thus not have pregnancies forced upon them by men.

But wait, that is only the very first layer of this massive onion.  Read on for more.

Of course, less often appreciated is how such outmoded rules also have the purpose and effect of indirectly controlling (non-alpha and non-elite) males as well, by keeping the "cost" of sex artificially and arbitrarily high as well.  But on balance, the effects are far worse for Women, making patriarchy a negative-sum game overall even if a few come out ahead.  This is basically the "commodity model" of sexuality, in which sex is something that men "take" from Women, as opposed to being a mutually beneficial and pleasurable act in itself.  And it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see how this model inevitably leads to rape culture.

So how does the commodity model ultimately benefit the patriarchy?   It keeps non-alpha, non-elite males subject to the oligarchs at the top by working harder and harder to get sex, basically.  And under patriarchy, that work is generally of the sort that serves to make the rich even richer, in the hopes of "earning" the "prize" of sex at the end of the rainbow.  And it also makes men that much more aggressive, which patriarchy loves.  But again, it is a massive Ponzi and pyramid scheme.  Meanwhile, Women end up enforcing their own oppression by slut-shaming each other to artificially prop up the "cost" of sex in the "sexual marketplace", which undermines any attempt at a sisterhood which would be the greatest bulwark against the patriarchy.  Divide and conquer, basically--both men against Women, and Women against Women.  And the oligarchs just sit back and laugh.

(See a pattern here?  This is the same sort of "artificial scarcity" that the patriarchy and oligarchy create with money, goods, and services in general.  To them, sex is just another commodity or currency with which to control the masses.)

Too many layers yet?  Well, we're still just barely scratching the surface here.  Additionally, Women in general can gain power and psychological influence over men via their sexuality, and patriarchy would logically do everything they can to keep this from happening.  Thus, Women's sexuality needs to be repressed even further.  This is particularly true when older Women date or hook up with younger men, which is of course extremely taboo under patriarchy for primarily that very reason.  A young man with an older Woman as a sort of "mentor with benefits" would seriously undermine the patriarchal agenda in so many ways.

The next layer is sexuality between Women themselves, i.e. lesbianism and bisexuality.  A majority of Women, if not nearly all of them, have some sort of capacity in this regard to one degree or another.  And as we see with the bonobos, what better way to encourage a strong sisterhood than through bonding sexually with one another?  Of course, patriarchy would HATE that!

Still another layer, and probably the most complex and puzzling at first glance, is patriarchy's perennial love-hate relationship with sex work (i.e. prostitution, pornography, stripping, and stuff like that).  On the one hand, patriarchs absolutely love to objectify and exploit Women sexually, both directly and in terms of profiting from it all, while on the other hand, they also fear the potential for Women gaining any sort of power through this avenue.  So they tolerate it, but only insofar as men can totally control the trade, not Women.  And they use the law as a cudgel in one way or another to do so.  For porn specifically, those who control the propaganda essentially control the agenda.  Additionally, this is also related to the patriarchy's love-hate relationship (you can see a pattern of ambivalence here) with nudity as well.  They make it naughty and illicit, and hypersexualize it, because otherwise people would be desensitized to it, and would probably be a lot saner too.  Can't have that, of course!

And still another layer to all of this is the fact that male-defined sexuality is the only kind of sexuality that patriarchy promotes, prioritizing male pleasure and conquest and rendering Female pleasure and well-being irrelevant.  It is essentially men using Women as masturbation machines, and plays right into the hands of the patriarchy.  Female-defined sexuality, the sort that prioritizes Female pleasure and perspective, of course, is what really throws a monkey wrench in the works of the patriarchy.  And patriarchy will be damned if they ever let men learn about that.

Thus, we see how keeping the "cost" of sex artificially high ultimately serves and maintains the patriarchy, regardless of whether some individual Women may benefit from it.  It's a Faustian bargain, and one that can never lead to a real Matriarchy in practice.  (If it could, it would have already.)

And when Women finally reclaim their rightful position as the new leaders of the free world, I believe that our society will become truly sexually free once again, albeit with some concessions to modern times of course.  In the meantime, we all need to stop slut-shaming Women yesterday.  A "sexual cartel" is no substitute for a genuine sisterhood.

Let the planetary healing begin!

RASA VON WERDER SAYS:  This amazing article was written TODAY by my request from Ajax the Great.  It's one of the best articles I've ever read concerning the faults of Patriarchy - It goes alongside the chapter by William Bond on female sexuality being free, women should consider loving one another for sisterhood.  These articles make brilliant points that need to be disseminated throughout the world.

  And Woman, thou art God!  Armed with these truths you can now vanquish Ole' Sleufoot in the army of Patriarchy, put the sword of Truth right into his jaw & silence him forever. 

There Is No "Back Door" To Matriarchy

Embodiment of God

 by Guest Author Ajax the Great 

I have invited women to participate in

putting together this New Religion, at the very least to ask questions, but no

women have come forward--only two men, William Bond & Ajax the Great are

helping.  Here Ajax speaks about the traitors to Matriarchy.  I will not post

the names of the living ones as I don't want to give them publicity where they

could use my name to further blow their horns.  I find these women vile &

disgusting.  The normal type belongs to Ajax, the text in caps is from

Rasa

Von Werder

Those who are familiar with The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood would recall that it depicts the fictional Republic of Gilead as a misogynistic and theocratic dystopia, not a utopia.  And in it, Women were often their own worst enemies

{RASA SAYS:   HERE WE GO.  THEIR OWN WORST ENEMIES IS RIGHT.  I FIND IT MORE DIFFICULT TO REACH WOMEN WITH THE MESSAGE OF MATRIARCHY THAN I DO MEN.  OF COURSE THEY ALL AGREE IN PRIVATE, HAHA.  IN THE CLOSET THERE'S LOTS OF SHEROES.  BUT PUBLICLY THEY FOLD UP & FALL LIKE A PACK OF CARDS.  IT'S THE SLAVE MENTALITY - FEAR OF 'MASSAH'.}

in that they enforced such repression and oppression on other Women.  That was primarily the role of the group of Women known as the Aunts, led by Serena Joy (who was loosely based on Phyllis Schlafly & xxxxx.  They apparently wanted to create a Matriarchal society through a sort of back door, by controlling Women in order to indirectly control men (by keeping the "cost" of sex artificially and arbitrarily high), and that of course backfired mightily on Women collectively as a class (even if a few individuals like Serena initially benefited at their expense). 

{RASA SAYS:  WE CALL THEM DICKS IN SKIRTS.}

The Handmaid's Tale is a work of fiction, of course, but the real-life wannabe Serena Joys do exist nonetheless, in that awkward space between the far left and far right, between fascism and communism, between extreme radical feminism and the Religious Right, and thus between extreme patriarchy and reverse patriarchy that is the hallmark of Horseshoe Theory (where ideological extremes are far more alike than they are different).  Phyllis Schlafly and xxxxx were infamous historical examples, but there are plenty of others as well such as xxxxx and her followers. 

{RASA SAYS:  WHAT DO THEY WANT?  IN HITLER'S TIME THERE WERE 'JEW BAITERS,' JEWS WHO WERE AROUND TO SQUEAL ON WHO WAS HIDING.  WHY DID THEY DO IT?  BENEFITS, SOMEHOW THEY GOT PAID--MAYBE IMMUNITY, FOOD, WHO KNOWS.

  WITH THESE WOMEN THEY GET APPROVAL FROM A WICKED SOCIETY.  THE WOMAN WHO DOES NOTHING IS USED UP BUT POLITICALLY, LEFT ALONE.  BUT THESE WOMEN WHO HURT WOMEN LIKE SO GET NOTORIETY, APPLAUSE, EVEN ADMIRATION FROM MEN & OTHER FEMALE NUMB-SCULLS WHO ARE MALE VASSALS.  THEY BECOME 'SOMEBODIES' BY HATING WOMEN.  THEIR SUCCESS IS TEMPORARY, I DOUBT THAT SELLING THEIR SOUL TO THE DEVIL WILL BODE THEM WELL IN ETERNITY.}

So what does this strategy supposedly look like?  It is NOT limited to just banning porn and prostitution, as that is just the start. 

{RASA SAYS:  UNDERSTAND THAT INTERFERING WITH THE SEXUAL RIGHTS OF WOMEN AS IN THESE VOCATIONS DOES NOT HELP THEM.  WOMEN NEED TO BE BASICALLY LEFT ALONE, SEX WORK NEEDS TO BE DE-CRIMINALIZED.  MAKING IT 'LEGAL' AS IN OVERSEEN BROTHELS DOES NOT CUT THE MUSTARD.  IT HAS TO BE LEFT ALONE WITH NO PROOF OF ANY KIND SHOWN TO GOVERNMENTS, LIKE SEX ITSELF NEEDS TO BE LEFT ALONE (BETWEEN CONSENTING ADULTS) & THE RESOURCES CHANGING HANDS DOES NOT MAKE IT INDECENT, IMMORAL OR SINFUL. 

TO ARREST WOMEN FOR TAKING MONEY MAKES THE GOVERNMENT HER PIMP--SHE HAS TO SELL MORE SERVICES TO PAY THE FINES & TIME AWAY FROM WORK--IT'S A CATCH 22 SITUATION.  WHO ARE THESE MEN TO LEGISLATE SEX?  AND OF COURSE, IT'S ALWAYS AGAINST WOMEN - & NO, ARRESTING THE CLIENT DOES NOT HELP, IT HURTS.  JUST LEAVE THEM ALONE.}

  It also involves banning or severely restricting birth control, abortion, homosexuality, and Women's sexuality in general, particularly that of younger Women (but ultimately all Women).  The control of Women's sexuality and reproduction is crucial to their agenda, and they basically seek to restore rigid, "traditional" gender roles in which Women are mere brood mares and men are the work horses, but of course only when it's convenient for the powers that be. 

{RASA SAYS:  DR. JAMES W. PRESCOTT HAS A MAJOR SITE ABOUT THE ORIGINS OF PEACE & VIOLENCE.  SOCIETIES WHICH REPRESS FEMALE SEXUALITY ARE VIOLENT, THOSE WHICH DO NOT ARE PEACEFUL.  THIS FACT WAS GLEANED FROM NUMEROUS SOCIAL ORDERS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, THE DATA OF WHICH HAD JUST COME OUT.  HE FURTHER EXPANDS ON THIS SUBJECT, HOW SEXUALITY MUST BE LEFT ALONE FOR THOSE IN PUBERTY--WITH EACH OTHER--PLAYING DOCTOR GAMES & THE LIKE.  THERE SHOULD NOT BE THE HYSTERIA ABOUT SEX WHICH THERE IS--LEAVE THE YOUNG PEOPLE ALONE - LEAVE CONSENTING ADULTS ALONE.} 

In other words, it is basically the same old-school patriarchy with some Women taking the place of the men in charge, albeit behind the scenes.  No one is really free when others are oppressed.  Thus, is it really any wonder that this strategy has NEVER brought about any sort of actual Matriarchy in practice? 

{THE DICKS IN SKIRTS AREN'T ABOUT MATRIARCHY, THEY ARE ITS OPPOSITE.  WOMEN WHO SLUT SHAME OTHERS ARE WRONG.  HERE ARE OTHER TOPICS THEY ARE IN THE WOODS ABOUT: 

REPRODUCTION RIGHTS - LEAVE WOMEN ALONE WITH BIRTH CONTROL & ABORTION.  THE PATRIARCHY WANTS TO CONTROL WOMEN'S REPRODUCTION SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY WANT MORE BOYS FOR WAR--'CANNON FODDER,'  & THEY WANT TO KEEP WOMEN BUSY BEING PREGNANT & NURTURING BABIES SO THEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO LEAD THE WORLD, (BAREFOOT & PREGNANT, FROM THE KITCHEN TO THE BEDROOM)--THEY ALSO WANT MORE BOYS FOR MALE PRIDE, BOYS TO LOOK UP TO THEM, & LAST BUT NOT LEAST, THEY WANT CHILDREN FOR SEXUAL PLAY-TOYS.

IT IS PATRIARCHS THAT HAVE CAUSED OVERPOPULATION, THE PLANET IS GROANING UNDER THE CHAOS, POLLUTION, ANIMAL HABITAT LOSS & NUCLEAR WASTE.  WOMEN ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO GIVE BIRTH BUT AN AVERAGE OF EVERY 5-6 YEARS AT MOST.  (FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO BE MOTHERS, THEY SHOULD HAVE A CHOICE.)  IT IS ONLY AT THAT AGE THAT THE COMPLETE IMMUNE SYSTEM OF THE CHILD DEVELOPS--& ALSO THEY SHOULD BE BREAST FED TO THAT AGE.  PEOPLE IN PATRIARCHY ARE SUFFERING A PANDEMIC OF ATTACHMENT DISORDER, A MALADY THAT RESULTS FROM LACK OF MOTHERING.  WE ALL HAVE IT, IT IS PART OF THIS SOCIETY.  ATTACHMENT DISORDER CAUSES ANXIETY, DEPRESSION, HOMICIDE, SUICIDE, SUBSTANCE ABUSE & SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION.}

Clearly the back door does NOT work.  Thus, Women need to charge through the front door instead.  Yesterday.

So let this be a warning, NOT a newspaper!  The master's tools will NOT dismantle the master's house, and you can't stop coercion by coercing.  Liberty is NOT a zero-sum game at all.  In fact, liberty is like love:  the more you give, the more you get.  So what are we waiting for?

Let the planetary healing begin! 

PS:  Ajax the Great explains the article to me in a letter: 

   In the comments section of the article I added clarification of who these evil and backstabbing women are.  As for Quiverfulls (which include families like the Duggars), it is part of the Christian Patriarchy Movement, an extremely patriarchal fundamentalist movement who is vehemently against birth control and essentially believes that every Woman should have as many children as possible, and often as early in life as possible.  (The term "Quiverfull" was taken from the phrase "quiver full of arrows", in a very literal and anachronistic interpretation of Psalm 127:3-5.)  They fervently believe in homeschooling and "home-churching", essentially creating their own insular family cults inside their own homes.

In my article I discuss one theory (i.e. sexual politics and the "commodity model" of sexuality) as to why some Women turn traitor, though there are likely several reasons.

Back to the Duggars, Google will tell you all you need to know about them.  I don't know whether to laugh or cry when thinking about that bizarre family, lol.

  

{RASA SAYS:  INDEED, THE INTELLIGENT, WELL INFORMED MEN SPEAK OUT AGAINST PATRIARCHY, PRO MATRIARCHY.  THOSE WHO DON'T UNDERSTAND THE INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTS OF WHAT IT'S ABOUT JUST KNOW THEY WANT & NEED TRUE LOVE (LIKE MOTHERS GIVE) RATHER THAN THE DOG-EAT-DOG RAT RACE, FAKE WORLD WE HAVE HERE.  WE ALL NEED MATRIARCHY BECAUSE WE ALL NEED LOVE.  AND SO, 

WOMAN, THOU ART GOD!

  DON'T LET THAT PRECIOUS PRESENCE OF GOD WITHIN YOUR BEING GO TO WASTE--USE IT TO SAVE THE WORLD.  IF YOU CAN'T SAVE THE ENTIRE WORLD, SAVE A COUPLE PEOPLE, IF YOU CAN'T SAVE ANYONE ELSE, SAVE YOURSELF!

To be continued   Rasa Von Werder   (article by Ajax the Great)   10-26-19

XXVIX<>SHE BEAR<>WOMEN MUST TAKE OVER THE WORLD

Embodiment of God

Guest Author William Bond - Comments in caps Rasa Von Werder

For a long time I have advocated that women should rule the world.  This is because for the whole of history, men have clearly done a terrible job of this by creating a world of continuous wars and a big gap between rich and poor.  Yet, sometimes when I have said this I have been told by women that females have no interest in ruling the world.

{RASA SAYS.  HA HA, HO HO.  NO INTEREST IN RULING THE WORLD?  THEY ONLY WANT TO CONTROL THEIR HUSBAND, THEIR CHILDREN & OTHER WOMEN, BUT NOT THE WORLD.  THEIR DESIRES FOR WORLD RULERSHIP ARE IN THE CLOSET--TIME TO COME OUT.} 

The reason for this could be that men tend to be more competitive than women and will therefore spend more time and effort competing against other men for power and wealth.  The problem with this is that if women are not willing to compete again men for power they leave a large power vacuum that can only be filled by men.  So that the way the world is ruled, only serves men’s interests, which are competition, conflict and war.  It doesn’t serve women’s interests of caring and nurturing children, animals, the sick and elderly. 

{RASA SAYS: IT'S TIME FOR US WOMEN TO STEP UP TO THE PLATE, ADMIT WE HAVE TO TAKE OVER, PICK UP THE BAT & START SWINGING.)  

We can see masculine instincts in nature when two male animals fight each other for dominance and access to females.  While the feminine instinct in nature is all about motherhood as female animals will nurture their young and care for them until they are old enough to look after themselves. 

{RASA SAYS:  WE LIVE IN TWO DIFFERENT WORLDS, TWO AGENDAS.  WOMAN DO WHAT THEY CAN IN THE PRESENT SYSTEM, BUT IT WILL TAKE A GREAT DEAL OF OUR STRUGGLE TO GO FROM THEIR POV TO OURS.  THIS IS DONE BY LEADERS, WHICH ARE ALWAYS A MINORITY.  FEW PEOPLE WANT TO STICK THEIR NECKS OUT, MAN OR WOMEN, TO DO SOMETHING AGAINST THE STATUS QUO.  THESE ARE THE BOLDEST, MOST AGGRESSIVE PEOPLE (EVEN IF THEY ARE LIKE GANDHI OR REV. MARTIN LUTHER KING, THEY ARE NOT AGGRESSIVE IN VIOLENCE BUT IN CONVICTION & ACTION.)  BOTH GANDHI & REV. MARTIN WERE ASSASSINATED - THAT'S WHY NO ONE WANTS TO DO THIS BUT SPECIAL PEOPLE.}

 

So masculine power is all about force, aggression, competition and violence, while feminine power is maternal and is about love, caring and nurturing. This then is the reason women are not as competitive or aggressive as men are, but if that is the case, what can motivate women to gain power?  Because clearly they less selfish and competitive than men.

  {RASA SAYS:  IT ISN'T PHYSICAL VIOLENCE & COMPETITION THAT GETS THE JOB DONE WHEN IT COMES TO RIGHTEOUSNESS.  WE HAVE THE SWORD OF THE SPIRIT, THE HELMET OF SALVATION, THE GIRDLE OF TRUTH, THE SHIELD OF FAITH, & FEET CLAD IN THE SANDALS OF PEACE.  THERE ARE DIFFERENT TYPES OF AGGRESSION OR BATTLE.  IN THE GREAT WARFARE WE FIGHT AGAINST FORCES NOT FLESH & BLOOD, THEY ARE IDEAS & ENERGIES.  HOW CAN YOU BEAT UP A DEMON?  WITH TRUTH?  HOW DO YOU PUT A SPEAR THROUGH THE HEART OF A DEMON?  WITH THE POWER OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.}

Some people claim that; the only way to be powerful is to also be aggressive and competitive.  But dictionaries tell us that power is the ability to act, to change or influence events.  Women have great power, because they bring life into our world.  Without women’s ability to give birth and look after their children, none of us would exist.  So surely that is a tremendous power that seems to be unrecognised in our male dominated world. 

{RASA SAYS:  EVERYONE KNOWS ABOUT THIS POWER UNCONSCIOUSLY BUT THEY DON'T BRING IT TO THE OPEN OR TALK ABOUT IT.  IT'S NOT ON THE AGENDA TO BE DISCUSSED, NOT ON THE TABLE OF PATRIARCHY.  PATRIARCHS ACT AS IF THEIR SYSTEM IS THE ONLY ONE & THAT IT'S A BATTLE OF THIS MAN VS. THAT MAN, CAPITALISM VS. SOCIALISM, COMMUNISM VS. NEOLIBERALISM.  THEY DO NOT DISCUSS THE WAR OF MALES AGAINST FEMALES, THE GENDER WAR, THE FIRST CONSPIRACY, THEY PRETEND IT NEVER HAPPENED & THIS SOCIETY & IT'S NUANCES, WHICH MALES CONTROL, IS ALL THERE IS.} 

There is a poem called, “The hand that rocks the cradle, is the hand that rules the world,” by William Ross Wallace (1819-1881).  This idea seems a paradox; we intellectually feel that this should be true, because the biggest influence on any child is its mother.  The child then grows up as an adult still strongly influenced by what its mother taught it.  But if this is correct, why are we living in a world ruled by men?  The reason is that mothers don’t use this power to benefit themselves or other women. 

{RASA SAYS:  INDEED--AS LONG AS WOMEN WERE BINDING THE FEET OF GIRLS IN CHINA THERE WAS NO HOPE.  AS LONG AS WOMEN IN AFRICA & MUSLIM COUNTRIES ARE CUTTING OUT THE CLITORISES OF GIRLS WE'RE IN TROUBLE.  AS LONG AS MOTHERS IN 'CIVILIZED' COUNTRIES BEST ADVISE TO DAUGHTER IS MARRY A RICH MAN, PATRIARCHY GOES ON. 

RIGHT NOW THE BEST ADVISE IS DAUGHTER, GET INTO LEADERSHIP, GET INTO GOVERNMENT, START A BUSINESS, & OH, BTW, HAVE YOU EVER THOUGHT OF AN ALTERNATIVE TO MARRYING A MALE?  WHY NOT LIVE WITH ANOTHER FEMALE OR FEMALES & JUST DO ONE-NIGHT STANDS IF YOU WANT TO HAVE KIDS?  OR ON ANOTHER LEVEL, EVER THOUGHT ABOUT LIVING A LIFE FOR GOD, NOT FRET ABOUT MEN & LIVE FOR YOURSELF?  PATRIARCHY IS NOT MANDATORY, NO ONE IS HOLDING A GUN TO YOUR HEAD IN THE 'CIVILIZED' WORLD, YOU DO HAVE A CHOICE.}

We can understand this by looking at the extreme male dominated religion of Islam. In many Islamic countries they have genital mutilation where the clitoris of young girls is cut off.  The shocking thing is that this is being done by women.  So why would women mutilate young girls is this way?  Because it was done to them and they have been indoctrinated by their mothers and their culture to do this. 

The same is also true of honour killings, where in Islamic culture a husband has a duty to kill his wife, if she dishonours him by refusing to respect or obey men.  Fathers will also murder their daughters who refuse to conform and even brothers will do the same to their sisters.  Even today in some Islamic countries a women can be stoned to death because she committed adultery, or whipped because she dare to complain when she was raped. 

{RASA SAYS:  THERE ARE DIFFERENT DEGREES OF ENSLAVEMENT WHICH PATRIARCHY IMPOSES ON US, FROM THE MOST EXTREME IN ISLAM TO THE MORE SUBTLE IN OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD.  IN ISLAM IT IS 'DO AS YOU'RE TOLD OR DIE,' BUT HERE IN AMERICA, FOR INSTANCE,  IF YOU'RE SINGLE PAST THIRTY PEOPLE WONDER ABOUT YOU, & YOU ARE NOT INVITED TO SOCIAL GATHERINGS WITH THE MARRIED.  YOU'RE CONSIDERED A SORT OF 'LOOSE CANNON' OR 'WOMAN UN-OWNED, THEREFORE NOT CATEGORIZED WHAT IS HER AGENDA--COULD BE ANTI-PATRIARCHY.'

  DURING THE INQUISITION ALL WOMEN OVER FORTY - ALIVE & UNMARRIED - WERE SUSPECTED OF BEING A 'WITCH.'  THIS MEAN GETTING ARRESTED, HER PROPERTY CONFISCATED & SHE IS TORTURED TO DEATH OR BURNED AT THE STAKE, ALONG WITH HER PETS.  THE INQUISITION IS NOT QUITE OVER.  SINGLE WOMEN ARE STILL LOOKED UPON AS WEIRD, NOT TO BE TRUSTED--COULD BE DANGEROUS.  HOW DO I KNOW?  I AM ONE. 

THERE IS THE ADDED ANATHEMA TO BEING IN THE ADULT TRADE.  SEX IS A CRIME IN PATRIARCHY FOR WOMEN, NOT MEN.  WOMEN SERVE MEN, THEY ARE BRANDED.  MEN ARE FREE.  THE WOMAN CAUGHT IN THE VERY ACT OF ADULTERY WAS STONED BUT WHERE WAS THE MAN?} 

Children are cared for by mothers but mothers try to train them to fit in with the society they belong, because she loves them.  This is because if she was to feed them ideas that go against society’s customs or traditions, she knows that this will cause her children conflict and alienation.  It could even cause them to be killed, in extreme Islamic country.  For this reason, mothers end up being staunch upholders of traditions, to protect their children, even though these traditions are detrimental to women. 

{RASA SAYS:  SOMEONE SOMEWHERE HAS TO STICK THEIR NECK OUT TO CHANGE.  THERE CAN BE MILD ACTIVISM OR WILD ACTIVISM.  IF YOU CAN'T GO WILD, DO MILD.} 

A man who kills his wife, sister or daughter in an honour killing, was once a small boy in his mother’s arms, but the mother never used her influence to tell him as a child, that honour killings are a bad thing.

 {RASA SAYS:  SHE MIGHT HAVE BUT COULD HAVE BEEN OVER-RULED BY PATRIARCHS.  MOTHERS DO SOMETIMES TEACH CHILDREN AGAINST PATRIARCHY BUT THEY GO THEIR OWN WAY.  IF IT'S HER--MOM--OR SURVIVAL THEY DO SOMETIMES TURN AGAINST MOM.}

So, when he grows up he may end up dominating, assaulting, abusing or killing his wife and daughters. We can see in this instance that yes, mothers do have great power, but as this power is being used against women, it does not benefit them.  So the question is how did it come about that women are not using their power over children, for their own benefit?

The answer would be that mothers tend to love their children more than they love themselves.  But by doing this, they have left a power vacuum that has been filled by men, who do not love their children to the same degree.  These men then use this power to indoctrinate children for their own advantage and to the disadvantage of women. 

This power also does not even benefit most men, as male dominated societies tend to be very warlike and young men find themselves dying in wars.  An extreme example is again in Islamic countries, where they use suicide bombers.  To do this, they have to indoctrinate young men into blowing themselves up in suicide attacks.  So the mothers of suicide bombers haven’t helped their sons by teaching him Islamic tradition.  All the mothers have done was to make it easier for their sons to be brainwashed, when they have grown up.  So they can be easy indoctrinated to commit suicide, by blowing up other people. 

{RASA SAYS:  I SAW A DOCUMENTARY ON THE KAMIKAZES OF JAPAN.  THESE GUYS DID NOT GO TO THEIR SUICIDE DEATH WITH JOY, IT WAS WITH THREATS & INTIMIDATION.  BASICALLY THEY WERE TOLD IF THEY DID NOT DO THIS, THEY WOULD BE BETTER OFF DEAD, BECAUSE THEY WOULD BE HATED BY THEIR COUNTRY & DISHONOR THEIR FAMILY.  THEY MIGHT HAVE EVEN TOLD THEM THEY WOULD BE KILLED AS TRAITORS--THAT I AM NOT SURE ABOUT BUT IT STANDS TO REASON.  BUT IF THEY DID IT, THEY WOULD BE HEROES, GO TO HAVEN, BE HONORED BY COUNTRY & FAMILY.

I THINK THE REASONING FOR SUICIDE BOMBERS IN ISLAM IS SIMILAR.  & EVERYONE LAUGHS AT THE BOMBER WHO PUT A METAL AROUND HIS PENIS SO IT WOULD STILL BE USABLE TO GET THOSE SEVENTY PROMISED VIRGINS IN HEAVEN.} 

So by being upholders of patriarchal traditions might make sense to women, on the short term and individual level, to protect her children.  But if we look at it from a wider perceptive, if women end up powerless because they have allowed men to take it away from them.  Then they do not have the power to protect and nurture, their own children. An example of this, in nature, is female bears. 

Mother bears are one of the most dangerous animals in nature, but the reason for this, is that male bears and predators like wolves and lynxes will kill bear cubs.  So a female bear has to be extremely aggressive and powerful to be able to protect her cubs.  As the result a mother bear will fearlessly fight a larger male bear to do this.  The lesson for human mothers, is that a powerless mother cannot protect her children in the way she wants to.  Nor can a mother who doesn’t recognize that males can be a threat to the welfare of their children.

{RASA SAYS:  ON SOME FRONTS CERTAINLY WOMEN SHOULD WAKE UP & SMELL THE DEGENERACY.  AT THE VERY LEAST, UNDERSTAND & BELIEVE THAT MALES ARE A DANGER TO CHILDREN FROM THE DAY THEY ARE BORN & DON'T LEAVE THEM IN THE CARE OF MALES.  DON'T TRUST ANY MALES - PRIESTS,  SCOUT LEADERS, CHOIR MASTERS, PRIVATE SCHOOLS - EVEN MOTHER SUPERIORS IN CONVENTS HAND CHILDREN OVER TO PRIESTS--SOME KNOWING THERE IS ABUSE.  KEEP CHILDREN AWAY FROM MEN IS A FIRST & DECISIVE STEP IN PROTECTING THEM.}

Unfortunately women are not as big as female bears and don’t have large claws and teeth.  Though it is true, that women can take up weight-lifting or martial arts to protect their children.  This might help, when dealing with violent men, but human power games are far more sophisticated, than animal power games. 

{RASA SAYS:  WITH THE BEARS, MALE BEARS ATTACK TO KILL THE BABIES, SOMETIMES EATING THEM, SO YES, IT IS EXTREME.   WITH HUMANS THE MOST COMMON THING IS SEXUAL ABUSE--SO A WISE WOMAN DOES NOT LEAVE KIDS ALONE WITH THEM.  AFTER THAT IS PHYSICAL BEATINGS & HERE, A FEMALE'S PHYSICAL PROWESS WOULD HELP & THE COURAGE TO USE A WEAPON AGAINST A MAN.  THERE SHOULD BE SOME KIND OF TRAINING SESSIONS FOR WOMEN TO DO THIS.  MEN ARE TRAINED BY SPORTS, MILITARY, THEN BEING POLICE.  THEY DID NOT GET TO BE THE WAY THEY ARE WITHOUT TRAINING.  THEY ARE TRAINED TO FIGHT & KILL.  WOMEN NEED TRAINING TO DEFEND THEMSELVES & CHILDREN, NOT JUST PHYSICAL TRAINING BUT PSYCHOLOGICAL & SPIRITUAL.

  ANOTHER KIND OF ABUSE IS BELITTLING, HUMILIATING A CHILD, BEING COLD HEARTED, ESPECIALLY BOYS BY THEIR DADS.  A MOTHER MUST STEP IN TO STOP THIS.  AND I DO UNDERSTAND, SOME MOMS ARE ABUSERS THIS WAY - MINE WAS.} 

An example of this is the book, “The Prince”, by Nicolo Machiavelli, which has become essential reading, for successful politicians.  It has in it, infamous sayings like, “It is better to be feared than loved,” and. “The end justifies the means.”  So when female politicians play power games with male politicians they end up having to be very Machiavellian, to compete successfully against male politicians.  Though in doing this, some female politicians end up as being as bad what they are.  But if women do not compete against men for power, they find they are very limited in what they can do, to protect their children. 

{RASA SAYS:  WE HAVE DISCUSSED THIS, WILLIAM & I, BEFORE, & OUR PROBLEM IS WE CANNOT USE MATRIARCHAL PRINCIPLES WITH A BUNCH OF PATRIARCHS & THEIR SYSTEM.  IT'S LIKE JESUS SUDDENLY BECOMING PRESIDENT OR PRIME MINISTER.  TRUMP HIMSELF SAID THAT CHRISTIANITY DOES NOT GO WITH BUSINESS PRINCIPLES.

  THE PATRIARCHY, INCLUDING CAPITALISM - ANY SYSTEM RUN BY MEN - IS DEMONIC.  THE COMMUNISTS BECAME DEMONIC, CHRISTIANITY BECAME DEMONIC.  YOU DON'T GET A JESUS, A BUDDHA OR A KIND HEARTED WOMAN  TO SUDDENLY TAKE OVER A PATRIARCHY & RUN IT WITH LOVE.  YES GANDHI CAUSED THE OUSTING OF ENGLAND FROM INDIA, BUT IT WAS NOT DONE PEACEFULLY - MANY DIED.  WHEN THE BLACKS IN AMERICA PROTESTED ALSO, MANY WERE KILLED, EVEN CHILDREN.  THESE CHANGES HAVE TO BE AFFECTED & IT WILL NOT BE  PEACEFUL BUT IF THE STRUGGLE IS CONSTANT & PEOPLE NEVER STOP IT CAN BE DONE--BUT IT TAKES TIME.} 

An example of this is a feminist mother who tries to prevent her sons from playing with toy guns.  Only to be undermined by TV action films to video games, which glorify violence.  These films portray violent men as heroes that become role models for many teenage boys.  The problem with this is that other teenage boys also watch these films and as the result teenage boys find they are in a violent gang culture when they socialise with other boys. 

{RASA SAYS:  PATRIARCHY CONTRIVES TO UNDERMINE MATERNAL RIGHTS IN ALL WAYS, THROUGH DOCTORING, THE COURT SYSTEM, THE MEDIA, & SOCIAL ETIQUETTE OR TABOOS.  WOMEN ARE CONSTRAINED TO HAVE FREEDOM WITH THEIR OWN CHILDREN.}

Mothers also find it hard to protect their daughters or themselves, if the police can’t be bothered to prosecute rapists.  So Feminists find themselves wanting to change not only TV programs, but customs, traditions, laws, and the educations system, and this requires women to work together, in collective action. 

{RASA SAYS:  UNFORTUNATELY, THEY HAVE BEEN BEATEN INTO SUBMISSION SO LONG THEY ARE COWARDS.  THEY WAIT FOR THE STRONG WOMEN TO STEP FORWARD TO FOLLOW IN THEIR FOOTSTEPS.} 

This in turn, does get some women interested in politics, which has a wider implication because men do a terrible job in ruling our world.  Patriarchal governments create wars and genocide as well as rule societies where there is a large gap between rich and poor.  What is hardly even discussed, is that if we had caring women rule our world, we would unlikely to have wars and they would more likely to create more loving and caring societies.

  {RASA  SAYS:  THAT IS THE ONLY WAY WARS WILL STOP, IF WOMAN ARE IN CHARGE.  THERE IS NO MAN ON A WHITE HORSE & NEVER WILL BE.}

It is true that now in many countries we have more and more female politicians.  But these women have to join patriarchal political parties and expect to act and behave like male politicians.  As the result we find female politicians who want to get promotion in any political party, have to agree with anti-women policies.  As well as trying to be as aggressive and ruthless as any ambitious men.  These women might follow Machiavelli’s ideas that, “The end justifies the means.” But end up losing all their ideals, as they compromise far too far.  They also throw away the big advantage of not using feminine power. 

{RASA SAYS:  THIS HAS TO HAPPEN SLOWLY, OVER MANY GENERATIONS.  WHEN THE CONGRESS & SENATE ARE MAJORITY WOMEN THERE WILL BE SOME CHANGES, WHEN WOMEN TAKE OVER MAJORITY LEADERSHIP OF THE FORTUNE 500'S THERE WILL BE SOME CHANGES.  BUT THE MOST IMPORTANT CHANGE WILL BE WHEN THE SHADOW GOVT IS ABOLISHED (ALL MEN) AS WELL AS THEIR BANKSTER-GANGSTERS ARE PUT OUT OF BUSINESS, THEN THINGS WILL CHANGE.  MOST OF THE WORLD LEADERS NOW ARE PUPPETS OF THE UNSEEN SECRET GOVERNMENT RUN BY THE TRILLIONAIRE FAMILIES--THEY RULE THE WORLD.} 

Unfortunately; female politicians, who act like men, give female politicians a bad name.  As it gives the people the impression that women in power, are just as bad as what men are.  If given a choice of which is better for our world, the masculine power of force, aggression, competition, conflict and violence or the feminine power of love, compassion, caring and nurturing.  Most sensible people would say feminine power is far better.  But what most people would also say is that it is unrealistic to think that we can live in a loving and caring world.  Not realising that this is just an excuse patriarchy governments always use, when challenged about the terrible way they are ruling the world.

In our present society we have to accept masculine patriarchal power because we are not given any other choice.  In democracies we are not given the choice of voting for two or more patriarchal political parties and the voters end up voting for the one that is the least worse.  What people don’t have, is the choice between a ruthless patriarchal political party or a caring and loving matriarchal political party.  This is because women have failed to organize themselves in the way men have.

{RASA SAYS:  THEY WILL DO THIS IN TIME.  WOMEN HAVE TO GET OVER THE 'SLAVE MENTALITY'.  THEY ARE PETRIFIED OF PATRIARCHY, IT'S UNJUST LAWS AGAINST WOMEN & THE APPLICATION OF LAWS IN FAVOR OF MEN.  THE WORLD IS DESIGNED AGAINST THEM, THEY CAN'T CHANGE IT OVERNIGHT.  AND ONE OF THE STRONGEST TABOOS IS FOR WOMEN TO BE FRIENDS, PARTNERS, TO JOIN TOGETHER IN GROUPS.}

We also find the same in religion where we are only given the choice of joining patriarchal religions that worship a male god with a male priesthood.  We don’t have the choice of joining a matriarchal religion with a loving female deity and with only female priests.  It is true some religious sects now accept the idea of a male and female god, and have some female priests, but women still find themselves part of a long patriarchal tradition.

  {RASA SAYS:  IT'S TIME TO STEP APART FROM MEN & FORM OUR OWN RELIGION, SPIRITUALITY, MORAL COMPASS, AUTONOMY, SYSTEM & AGENDA.  GOOD BYE MEN.} 

Feminist like to claim that man and women are the same. 

{RASA SAYS:   THEY FOUGHT FOR EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW, NOT THAT WE ARE EQUAL BY NATURE.  MOST WOMEN IN THEIR RIGHT MINDS, EVEN BEFORE WE KNEW THE SCIENCE, KNEW WE WERE SUPERIOR.}

In spite of the fact that men cannot give birth, while women have far less testosterone in their bodies which makes them physically weaker and less aggressive than men.  Yes, women can take up body building and martial arts but she to compete again men on a level playing field she has to also take steroids.  As steroids will not only make them stronger but more aggressive as well.

  {RASA SAYS:  YES, JUST A BIT OF CHEMICAL & WE ARE MUCH STRONGER & MORE AGGRESSIVE.}  

The same is true when women compete against men in politics or business; they are told they have to learn to be assertive and aggressive as men.  So in our patriarchal world, we are told that the masculine force is all powerful in our world and the feminine is too weak to stand up against it, but is this really true?  Or is it that few people understand what feminine power is and therefore it’s not being used enough in our world. 

{RASA SAYS:  THEY HAVE LEARNED THAT WOMEN SURPASS MEN IN NEGOTIATION, COOPERATION & SOLVING OF PROBLEMS.  IT'S A STRATEGY FOR SURVIVAL.  MALE WAYS HAVE GONE THE WAY OF THE DINOSAUR--IT'S CALLED 'MIGHT MAKES RIGHT' & THEY'VE BROUGHT US TO THE EDGE OF NUCLEAR DISASTER.} 

For most of our history it has been believed that the masculine methods of force and intimation are the best way to influence people, but in the 20th century this view has been challenged.  Many psychologists are claiming that rewards are a better way to influence people than punishment.  Now, rewards are the method that women are far more likely to use.

  {RASA SAYS:  INDEED, THE CARROT & THE STICK--WHICH WORKS BETTER?  YOU CAN LEAD A GOAT WITH A CARROT OR A DRUG ADDICT WITH A DRUG.  YOU CAN BEAT SOMEONE INTO SUBMISSION, YOU CAN WHIP THE HORSE DURING THE RACE TO SPEED HIM UP, BUT SUGAR MAKES THE MEDICINE GO DOWN.

LOOK AT THE WAYS GOD/LIFE DEALS WITH US.  SAY YOU ARE AN ADDICT.  UNTIL YOU REACH 'ROCK BOTTOM' THEY SAY YOU WON'T QUIT.  ALL THE ARGUMENTS IN THE WORLD CAN'T MAKE THEM STOP.  WHAT IS ROCK BOTTOM?  NOT SURE WHAT IT IS BECAUSE SOME OF THEM REACH IT, GET REHAB & LATER GO BACK TO IT, EVEN KILLING THEMSELVES.

THEN AGAIN I READ WHERE SOLDIERS ARE MADE TO TORTURE PRISONERS, & AFTERWARD GIVEN WHISKEY & WOMEN FOR SEX, TO MAKE THEM DO IT AGAIN.

AND HOW DOES GOD DEAL WITH US?  FIRST GOD TELLS US IN A NICE WAY WHAT THE RULES ARE.  BUT WE KEEP SMOKING & GET CANCER, OR USE THE MICROWAVE OVEN.  THEN WE GET CANCER, WE THINK TWICE ABOUT SMOKING OR RADIATION, WE GET PURIFIED OF OUR SIN.

WITH PARENTS, DISCIPLINE OF CHILDREN DOES NOT ALWAYS WORK, SOMETIMES A SPANKING DETERS BAD BEHAVIOR.  IT'S A SCIENCE TO ITSELF.} 

Most sensible people would want be ruled by loving and caring feminine women, rather than aggressive and selfish male rulers, but are never given this choice.  So people can only choose if women are willing to organize themselves along with men who respect women to form Matriarchal political parties and Matriarchal religions.

A female bear also recognizes how dangerous a male bear can be to her children.  Human mothers have to think along the same lines.  Not only can men inflict violence or sexually assault her children.  When men rule the world, too many women end up in poverty and are unable to feed their children, because male rulers selfishly keep the wealth of the country in their own hands.  Patriarchal governments also like wars and use teenage boys as “cannon folder” to fight these wars.   What the mothers of these boys think about this, is not important, because they are powerless to prevent this happening. 

If women want to be free to nurture and care for their children they cannot leave it up to men to rule our world.  Because men do not have the same maternal instincts women have and therefore have far less interest in the welfare of children than what women do.  Women have to learn from female bears, that a good mother who can truly care for her children, has to be also a powerful mother.  A weak mother cannot care for her children no matter how much she tries.   So if women want to be good mothers and care for their children they have to make sure they have the power to do this, and they can only do this by collectively working together to rule the world.

{RASA SAYS:  I THINK WE'VE ALL HAD ENOUGH OF PATRIARCHY, MEN & WOMEN.  IT'S TIME FOR MEN TO THINK TWICE ABOUT THE 'PRIVILEGES' THEY HAVE & CONSIDER HELPING WOMEN FIND THEIR RIGHTS, THEIR AUTONOMY & THEIR LEADERSHIP.  THEY CAN HELP. 

 AND YOU, WOMAN, THOU ART GOD.  IF YOU DON'T DO SOMETHING, NOTHING WILL GET DONE EXCEPT THE EXTREMELY SLOW EXTINCTION OF MEN.  YOU NOW HAVE TO STEP FORWARD, AS THIS RELIGION INDICATES, REALIZE YOUR DIVINITY, DISCOVER YOUR AUTONOMY, SELF-DIRECTION, ZEITGEIST, AGENDA, WORLD VIEW, RULERSHIP, SPIRITUALITY & RELIGION, YOUR OWN DESIRES, NEEDS & DREAMS - GO FOR IT - DO IT NOW!  BEGIN TODAY!  GOD WILL THANK YOU FOR IT! 

To be continued   Rasa Von Werder   10-25-19

Embodiment of God

XXVIII    MALE MASOCHISM  The New Religion - Woman Thou Art God

William Bond says:

Male masochism as we see in the FemDom scene is a big problem for many

academics, because they tell us that man has always been the dominant sex.

 
Rasa says: I pay close attention to the writings of William Bond, as he’s the most important male theoretician in the matriarchal movement. His insights have been important in shaping our theology and political POV.  See William's writing in regular letter, my comments in caps.

As you are now talking about Femdom again Rasa, I though I would send you a article I wrote some time ago, about this.

Male masochism as we see in the FemDom scene is a big problem for many academics, because they tell us that man has always been the dominant sex. Also men are bigger, stronger and more aggressive than women, so why would any man want to submit to women? This is why we get all these complex theories about male masochism to try to explain away this anomaly. 

RASA SAYS:  BRILLIANT OBSERVATION WILLIAM.  SINCE I'VE BEEN A GIRL & HAVE READ STUDIES & BOOKS (FROM THE AGE OF SEVEN!  BECAME A BOOKWORM AT THAT TIME, LIVING NEXT DOOR TO THE PUBLIC LIBRARY ON VAN BUREN ST., NEWARK, N.J.  MY  THIRD STORY BEDROOM LOOKED RIGHT INTO THE CHILDREN'S SECTION OF THE LIBRARY!)  I'VE BEEN TOLD THAT MALES ARE THE NATURAL DOMINANT SEX, THAT WE FEMALES MUST DEFER TO THEM, KOW TOW, LAUGH AT THEIR JOKES, BE FEMININE OR PASSIVE TO THEM, LOOK UP TO THE AS HEROES & LEADERS & ALL THAT TRASH.

  I DIDN'T KNOW THEN THIS WAS ALL PROPAGANDA A PACK OF LIES FROM PATRIARCHY.  IT DIDN'T MAKE SENSE BUT I COULDN'T UNDERSTAND WHY SOCIETY TAUGHT THIS.  I DIDN'T KNOW WE FEMALES HAD BEEN WARRED OVER, CONQUERED, STOLEN FROM MATRIARCHAL VILLAGES IN ANCIENT DAYS;  THAT WE ARE PRISONERS OF THEIR WARS!  & AS PRISONERS, WE ARE FORCE FED THEIR VERSION OF REALITY, WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO STUDY OR DO RESEARCH, DIGGING FOR THE TRUTH (& THEY HAVE SYSTEMATICALLY BURNED OUR HER-STORY, HID OTHER PARTS, SWEPT THEM UNDER THE RUG, MADE OR LIFE STORIES TRIVIAL BACKGROUND TO THEIR SO-CALLED HEROIC IMPORTANT WORK, WE ARE THE SLAVES & SERVANTS FOR WHOM IT WAS ILLEGAL TO READ OR WRITE - RIGHT UP TO THE 20TH CENTURY.

  FEMALES WERE NOT ADMITTED TO THE HIGHEST RATED IVY LEAGUE COLLEGES IN AMERICA UNTIL 1976!  IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE THAT WE HAVE BEEN BASICALLY DEPRIVED OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS THROUGH THE PATRIARCHY & IT'S MURDEROUS AGENDA!

What is very problematic for male academics is that male masochism points to an uncomfortable fact that men might not have always been the dominant sex. We don’t have to look to complex theories for why we have male masochism, we can see it clearly in the behavior of other primates.

Male masochism and submission to females has been observed in bonobo apes, vervet monkeys, macaques, olive baboons, patas, rhesus monkeys, grey langus, capuchins, prosimians and Madagascar lemurs. So why would males of these species want to submit to female? Because in evolutionary terms it is a powerful tool for survival.

All evolutionary theories concentrate on males, (mostly because male academic invented them,) and in some these theories the role of the female is not even mentioned. This is an extreme male bias, because in evolutionary terms the role of the female is far more important than the role of the male. The reason is because it is the female that give birth to the young and has the main role in caring for the young until they are fully grown. Therefore, the survival of any species is far more dependent on the female than the male. So it is the female that brings the next generation into being and nurtures them to adulthood.

RASA SAYS: YES, AND IN THEIR LIES PATRIARCHS DEFY LOGIC, BUT WHEN THEY ARE IN CHARGE, PEOPLE JUST FOLLOW THEM LIKE LEMMINGS, NOT EVEN QUESTIONING THEM, AS TO QUESTION THEM MEANS CONFLICT WITH THE “RULING PARTY” AND MOST PEOPLE DON’T WANT TROUBLE.

This is why in evolutionary terms the males of any species are expendable. Simply because one male can fertilize hundreds of female, so even if most males were wiped out, it doesn’t matter, because only a few males are needed to keep the species going. Whereas if most of the females were wiped out then the whole species would be in grave danger, because female are limited in how many young they can produce. It is true in small rodents a female can produce large numbers of young in a year, but in larger mammals like human beings, one baby a year is the average woman’s limit. This means that in evolutionary terms, the survival of females is far more important than the survival of males.

  RASA SAYS:  INDEED THE MALE HAS ALWAYS BEEN EXPENDABLE IN EVOLUTIONARY TERMS & EVEN MEN ARE CATCHING ON.  I HAVE A BOOK WRITTEN BY TWO MEN CALLED 'THE REDUNDANT MALE,' & THIS WAS PUBLISHED A WHILE BACK--WAS IT 70'S?  OF COURSE PATRIARCHY DEFIES ALL LOGIC, LIKE THE CONQUERING COUNTRIES WHICH TAKE OVER ANOTHER BY WAR & THEY THEN DECLARE WHAT IS 'TRUTH' - THAT THEY WERE RIGHT, THE CONQUERED FOLKS WERE WRONG. 

IN THE ORIGINAL CREATION IT WAS THE FEMALE THAT MADE THE FIRST MALE  THROUGH PARTHENOGENESIS. SHE GOT THE BRIGHT IDEA OF MAKING A 'HELPMATE.'  HE COULD NOT REPRODUCE, BUT HE COULD CONTRIBUTE TO HER HIS DNA VIA SPERM, FOR HER TO DO SO.

  HIS DEVELOPMENTAL ENERGY WAS USED TO CREATE MUSCLES, & ALSO SINCE HE CAN'T BEAR CHILDREN HE DOES NOT NEED NURTURING ABILITY--HE HAS NO COMPASSION, EMPATHY, GENTLENESS, KINDNESS--HE'S A KILLER WHO JUMPS INTO DANGEROUS SITUATIONS LIKE IN FRONT OF CREATURES THAT CONFRONT THE WOMAN OR CHILD--OR IF ANY MAN THREATENS. 

IN OTHER WORDS, HIS BRAIN IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE FEMALES.  HE PUTS HIMSELF IN HARM'S WAY AS HE IS REDUNDANT.  HIS FRONTAL LOBES ARE ASLEEP.  THERE IS IMPULSE CONTROL--HE DOESN'T HAVE IT.  THERE IS CAUTION--HE DOESN'T HAVE IT.  IN WOMEN THESE TRAITS ARE STRONG, IN HIM THEY ARE WEAK BECAUSE HE'S BUILT TO PROTECT THE WOMEN & CHILDREN.

This is also why, in the island of Madagascar all the lemur species live in female dominated societies. Madagascar has a very long dry season of 8 months, where lemurs in that period find it very hard to find nourishing food. Now, in this situation, if lemurs lived in male dominated societies they would quickly become extinct. This is because during the dry season, the alpha males would grab all the available food for themselves and allow the females to starve. Which means the females wouldn’t have enough food to grow young in their bodies or have enough nourishment to suckle their young with milk, or be strong enough to care for and protect their young. So in these conditions a male dominated Lemur species would quickly become extinct.

Whereas what happens to Madagascar lemurs is that even though females are smaller than males, the male always give way to the females in all disputes. This means that in the dry season alpha females get to feed first with any food the lemur communities find. This ensures the females stay healthy and are more able to breed, and if some of the males die of starvation through the dry season, it doesn’t cause any problems to the survival of the whole species.

Now, the human beings have also evolved through very difficult conditions. Scientists claim that we are 4 million years old. This means that more than 99% of human existence happened in the Stone Age. So we are still basically Stone Age people and what happened over the last five thousand years of human history has made very little difference to our true nature. In our ancient past we have experienced ice ages and times of rapid climate change, causing the extinction of many animals like mammoths, sabre-tooth tigers and even other species of humans like the Neanderthals. This means in these times of rapid climate change, species of animals that are female dominated will have a decided advantage over species that are male dominated.

More so for the human being because unlike any other animal, the human baby is completely defenseless for the first few years of its life, and it nearly 20 years before it is fully-grown. So the human mother has to put in far more time and effort into caring for her young than any other animal. This means that in times when food is scarce, it means that only female dominated tribes humans would survive. This is because the males would sacrifice themselves, allowing the women and young to eat first and not use their superior size and strength take food away from women. Whereas in male dominated tribes, the alpha males would eat first and the women and children would die, and the tribe wouldn’t survive when food became plentiful again.

In is noticeable that patriarchy happened only after the invention of agriculture, which produced an abundance of food.

RASA SAYS:  ANOTHER BRILLIANT OBSERVATION OF WILLIAM I NEVER SAW ANYONE ELSE MENTION.  INVENT AGRICULTURE, ABUNDANCE OF FOOD ENCOURAGES PATRIARCHY.

This allowed alpha males to dominate human society through violence without threatening the survival of the human species. Unfortunately, men are not used to ruling

RASA SAYS:  YET AGAIN, AN OBSERVATION FEW THINK OF.  MEN WERE NOT USED TO RULING.  BUT THEY DON'T HAVE THE FRONTAL LOBES ABILITY TO DO SO, APART FROM ANYTHING ELSE, APART FROM LACK OF EXPERIENCE.  THEIR INSTINCT MAKES THEM KILLERS, IT'S ALL THEY KNOW.  WAR IS THE FOUNDATION OF PATRIARCHY, IT IS WHO THEY ARE.

  LIKE THE CHIMPANZEES, THEY MAKE WAR, THEY STEAL FOOD, THEY EVEN EAT THE ENEMY.  THEY DO NOT RULE THE CHIMPANZEE CLAN WITH JUSTICE OR INTELLIGENCE, IT'S MIGHT MAKES RIGHT, IT'S BRUTALITY, & WHOEVER IS MOST BRUTAL CONTROLS THE REST - JUST LIKE OUR HUMAN PATRIARCHY ALTHOUGH WE GET SUBTLE NUANCES, SNEAKY FRONTS IN THEIR CRUELTIES, THEIR PRETENSES.  I MIGHT ADD HERE THAT PATRIARCHY IS RULE OF THE CHIMPS, MATRIARCHY RULE OF THE BONOBOS.

and do a terrible job in ruling our world creating a world of conflict, war, inequality and suffering.Yet we are all still Stone-Age people, so the desire within men to submit to women is still within us. This is why patriarchy needs to teach men to degrade women to prevent them for reverting to their natural instincts. 

RASA SAYS:  THEY HAVE BEEN WORKING HARD AT DEGRADING WOMEN THROUGH RELIGION, EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT & MEDIA & IT'S STILL GOING ON.

This makes it possible for men to give blind obedience to alpha men rather than to women. This is why in many strongly patriarchal societies women are degraded and subjected to male violence, to teach ordinary men to overcome their desire to submit to women. Though, his is now changing in Western countries, where women are no longer being degraded in the same way. This allows men to get in touch with their natural desire to want to worship women. 

RASA SAYS:  MEN WORSHIP WOMEN AS MOVIE STARS, STRIPPERS, DANCERS, MODELS.  ANYONE WHO IS BEAUTIFUL THEY WORSHIP & THIS IS ACCEPTED.  BUT I DECLARE THROUGH MY EXPERIENCE THAT MEN BY NATURE WANT TO WORSHIP MOTHER-FIGURES, BECAUSE THE FIRST WOMEN THEY EVER LOVED IS THEIR MOTHER, OR OTHER MATERNAL CARE GIVER.  WHEN THEIR FIRST EXPERIENCES OF LOVE ARE FEMALE THEY AUTOMATICALLY ARE ATTRACTED TO OLDER FEMALES IN THEIR PUBERTY & FOR SOME, THIS CONTINUES ALL THEIR LIFE. 

OF COURSE PATRIARCHY DISCOURAGES THIS & THEY HAVE FOR MILLENNIA TORN  BOYS AWAY FROM MOTHER LOVE THROUGH VARIOUS MEANS, BY  SEXUAL ABUSE, BY STEALING BOYS FROM MOM'S IN THE GREEK & ROMAN DAYS & BY INDOCTRINATION/PROPAGANDA.  BEING A 'MAMMA'S BOY' OR LOVING OLDER WOMEN IS CONSIDERED SHAMEFUL, THEY WANT BOYS TO WORSHIP MEN & WANT  MEN FOR LOVE & SEX. 

THERE IS A TREMENDOUS FEAR OF THE INFLUENCE & TEACHING OF OLDER WOMEN TOWARD YOUNG MALES - OLDER WOMEN TEACH THEM TO LOVE WOMEN, GIVE RESPECT, CONSIDERATION, OBEDIENCE.  IT IS THE OLD WOMEN WHO MUST GUIDE, CORRECT INSTRUCT YOUNG MALES IN ALL THINGS INCLUDING LOVE, SEX, LIFESTYLE & SPIRITUALITY.  THIS IS ONE OF PATRIARCHY'S GREAT FEARS & THEY HAVE WORKED HARD TO MAKE IT TABOO.

This means that the Femdom scene is not a perversion or mental illness as many academic male physiologists will want you to believe. It is a natural instinct that comes from our Stone Age past. Men have only been taught to suppress this instinct by the alpha males who conquered the peaceful Matriarchal civilizations of the Neolithic age. When men are no longer taught to degrade women and dominate them through violence, then women will once again take their true role of the dominant sex of the human race. 

RASA SAYS:  DR. BRYAN SYKES, WORLD'S LEADING GENETICIST, HAS SAID AS MUCH.  HE SAYS WE ARE 'MODERN' IN TECHNOLOGY BUT ANCIENT IN OUR GENES, OUR INSTINCTS.  WE ARE STILL 'HUNTER-GATHERERS' INSIDE HE SAYS.

  THERE IS NO PATRIARCHAL AGENDA INBORN IN US, WE ARE ALL MATRIARCHS, WE ALL WORSHIP MOTHER & GOD AS MOTHER, WE ALL INSTINCTIVELY VENERATE WOMEN, NOT MEN, & NONE OF US BY INSTINCT WORSHIPS MEN OR A MALE GOD--THIS IS ALL FORCED ON US. 

MEN SHOULD STOP SUBMITTING TO OTHER MEN FOR THEIR OWN GOOD, OTHER MEN TAKE THEM TO THEIR DEATH.  YES, THEY ARE ALREADY IMPULSIVE, EVEN FOOLHARDY BY NATURE - BUT THAT HAS TO BE WITHIN REASON, & WITH FEMALES IN CHARGE, THEY ARE NOT SENT TO THEIR DOOM.  WITH MALES IN CHARGE, FEMALES ARE FORCED TO PRODUCE MILLIONS OF BOYS FOR 'CANNON FODDER- - THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN IN MATRIARCHY.  THEY PROTECT WOMEN & CHILDREN WHEN IT MUST BE DONE, BUT WOMEN DO NOT CREATE WARS WHERE THEY SEND MEN TO DIE.

BOTTOM LINE HERE IS THAT WOMAN, THOU ART GOD.  WATCH OUT FOR YOUR MEN.  TEACH THEM THE TRUE WAY OF LIVE, DO NOT ALLOW THEM INTO THE CLUTCHES OF PATRIARCHY.  YES IT WILL TAKE WORK TO PROTECT THEM, NURTURE & TEACH THEM THE RIGHT WAYS.  DO THE BEST YOU CAN, GOD IS ON YOUR SIDE.  GO IN PEACE TO LOVE & SERVE MOTHER GOD!

To be continued    Rasa Von Werder    10-22-19