Female God Matriarchy Convos

 

 

Why God is Female

by William Bond   Conversation with William, Pete & Rasa

 

For about the last two thousand years most people have taken it for granted God is a male. So why do we think this?  The reason for this, is that it says so in two books, the Bible and the Koran. Both books claim it was a male god that created the world. But it wasn’t always like this, before we had religions like Christianity and Islam there were religions that had both Gods and Goddesses. And before that at the beginning of recorded history there was the religion of ancient Great Mother who gave birth to the world. So it seems that in the distant past people believed that God was a woman. 

 

Mystics, claim we are all, “One Mind, One spirit”. Mediums and people who have had near death experiences tell us, it that the spirit world is a world of Oneness and unconditional love. Concepts like Oneness and unconditional love are feminine attributes. The masculine is all about competition and aggressiveness and so it would be very unlikely for male god to create a world of harmony and Oneness through universal love. 

 

The nature of God is pure love and Jesus tried to tell us this when he taught that God is a loving Father God. He couldn’t tell us that God is a loving Mother because that would have been totally unacceptable to the Jewish religion of the time. So his message was only partly successful, because people do not see think of men as loving and found it difficult to imagine a loving male god . So it was easy for Christian priests who preferred the Old Testament God, to ignore the teachings of Jesus and tell us that God judges, condemn and punishes us. As the result Christians once called themselves, “God-fearing people”. The reason priests promoted this idea, was that they could use people’s fear of God to gain power over them. Telling people if they disobey God, which in reality means disobeying the priests, they will burn in hellfire when they die. 

 

Love is more feminine than masculine. Back in pagan times they didn’t have gods of love it was always a Goddess of love. Like Aphrodite, Venus, Freya, Hathor, Parvati and Ishtar who were all goddesses of love. We are living in a world of conflict and chaos because we believe in a false male God who is separate from us and doesn’t sound he is very approachable or understanding. As the result, we do not try to communicate with the Real God that is feminine and loves us all unconditionally, because we are unaware of Her. Also she is on the frequency of unconditional love and we have to also be loving to be on the same frequency. 

 

God not only loves us all unconditionally but she has given us the gift of freewill and will not interfere with our choices. So if we choose to believe in a fictional male God we have to pay the consequences of this even though we have made this choice out of ignorance. The reason we have chosen to believe the lies of priests is that we were not on the frequency of love and so God could not communicate with us. 

 

 This is why the world needs religions dominated by loving women who will not use religion to gain wealth and power for themselves. Who will clearly state that God is feminine and loves us all unconditionally. This means we can all use meditation and prayer to contact Her and receive Her help and guidance. She is MotherGod and She loves us all unconditionally because we are all her children but she has also given us freewill so we are free to believe whatever we like. But we can all return to the loving arms of God our Mother by knowing Her true nature and believing in Her. 

End

 

From William:   Hi Rasa

Patriarchy has given God a bad name. Too many people think God is a "Old man in the sky" who judges, condemns and punish us. That's why people have problems with talking about God. The idea of a loving Father God, that Jesus promoted never really caught on. 

 

This is why it is so important for people to know that God is female. A Mother who gives us all unconditional love. But because we believe in a male God it is hard to communicate with Her because we are trying to contact a God that doesn't exist. MotherGod has given us the gift of freewill and if we lose contact with MotherGod then without her guidance, we do stupid things like letting men rule the world.

 

From Pete:   I just put another new (recycled and updated) article on the blog as well:

 

https://rasavonwerder-william.blogspot.com/2023/03/patriarchy-has-kill-switch-and-we.html

 

From William:   Hi Pete

I was also writing about the power of female sexuality in dominating men in my new book, "Femdom Witchcraft" and in my research I came across the story of how two women took control of the Vatican in the 10th century. 

 

Saeculum obscurum - Wikipedia

 

From Pete:   Indeed, William.  Thank you.  I remember reading about the Seculum Obscurum a while back on Wikipedia and elsewhere.  While it is usually selectively remembered as a time of corrupt male popes, including one pope who literally turned the Vatican into his own personal brothel (!), the highly underrated but more remarkable part about the two Women taking control of the Vatican is often forgotten, but no less important. Mainstream male historians really "bury the lede" there, it seems.  When it is remembered, the term "Pornocracy" (literally "rule by harlots") is sometimes used in a derogatory way to describe it.  And of course "Seculum Obscurum" literally translates to "Dark Age", also a negative term.  Never mind that Vatican corruption was rife long before and after that period, and apparently continues today to some extent.

 

The power of female sexuality should not be underestimated.  No wonder patriarchy fears it so much.  Related to this, I was thinking recently about Brave New World vs 1984, and whether controlling people through pleasure is more effective than controlling people through pain.  Behaviorist B.F. Skinner observed that positive reinforcement (that is, pleasure), works best, which inspired Aldous Huxley.  I would argue more specifically that for Women to control men, pleasure is more effective than pain, and when the genders are reversed, the reverse is true.  No wonder patriarchy historically has broadly viewed pain as a virtue and pleasure as a vice, as the ever-insightful Dr. James W. Prescott has observed.

 

From William:  Hi Rasa and Pete

I have finished writing my book Femdom Christianity and sent to my publisher he wrote back and said.-  “Thanks William, will take a look asap.  Best, Steve.”

 

So hopefully he will publish it. What comes to my mind now is, “Trust in God She will provide”. So if women you meet are interested in your ideas Rasa then to me that is a sign you getting help from God. 

 

Now that I’m not spending so much time writing and researching my book I have had time to look at things of the internet and looked at Naomi Wolf videos and according to her these covid jabs will finish off men in a few generations. 

 

Naomi Wolf: Some Men Are Going To Have Horrible Problems As The Result Of COVID-19 Injections

 

 

From Pete:   As for the Naomi Wolf videos, I didn't watch them yet, but I will.  That is truly disturbing stuff indeed!   Hopefully the worst case scenario will not play out, God willing.

 

On a side note, there has been some talk on Substack lately about Naomi Wolf being possibly controlled opposition, much like Robert Malone, so who knows really.  There was one article she wrote recently on Substack that I found a bit out of character for her and that I commented on.  I would say, don't read it unless you want to get angry, lol.

 

https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/have-the-ancient-gods-returned

 

There was a lot to unpack in this article, and she really misses the mark in some parts, especially her negative view of pagan Goddesses like Asherah, but long story short, I had put something in the comments about how the real root of the problem is on the "ancient gods" returning all of a sudden, but rather the demonic patriarchy and its evil paradigm, and has been going on for thousands of years since men took over and displaced Women from power.  Some readers seemed to agree with me, while Wolf herself had replied that Women can be just as evil and sadistic as men.  So I am really wondering just how much of a feminist she really is anymore.  She replied: 

 

"Respectfully I’ve given this point a lot of thought and history shows women are as sadistic as men given the chance."

 

I had also made sure to mention the two of you in one of my comments, along with other authors that inspired me, in order to give credit where it is due, and she says she "read them, but thank you".  So I think she is a mixed bag overall.

 

From William:   Hi Pete

I know Naomi Wolf is a practicing Jew and goes to her synagogue regularly so I suppose she would have patriarchal views about religion. So personally I wouldn’t bother to listen to her about her religious opinions. 

 

But if she and Robert Malone are, controlled opposition then I think they are doing far too good a job at opposing the vaccine and I think Bill Gates would have sacked them by now. I think the problem is that Naomi Wolf and Robert Malone both were left-wing but got shunned by the left when they spoke out about the vaccines. So the only people who would listen to them was the MAGA crowd. I find myself in a similar position, I’m left-wing but left-wing  politicians in both the USA and UK have sold the working-class down the river. So it is now hard to know whom you can trust nowadays. 

 

From Pete:   Very true, William.  She may or may not be controlled opposition, who knows?

 

And yes, it is true that the so-called "left" utterly sold the working class down the river.  First with their capitulation to neoliberalism in the 1980s and ever since, and again more recently with their support for lockdowns, closures, masks, and jab mandates (except for Sweden and Nicaragua, of course.)  And the self-proclaimed "socialists" like the World Socialist Web Site (an offshoot of the Fourth International) today are the absolute worst of all, aside from the mainstream center left gatekeepers.  There are of course some genuine leftist groups on our side here and there such as "Left Lockdown Sceptics", but they are few and far between.

 

From Rasa:   Wow.  The bit about Naomi Wolf.  She is definitely, from what you explain, NOT ON OUR SIDE, the side of MATRIARCHY, FEMALE SUPREMACY, women taking over the family & the world.  She has done terrific research in the past, like with 'The Beauty Myth' which I read bits & pieces of, & heard her speeches.  Is she WORKING BOTH SIDES?  Playing safe?  I will not look to her as an ally.  And she has read William & me, she says?  And no thanks?  Who does she think she is?  Long ago I contacted her literary agent to get an interview from her.  He asked me HOW MUCH WOULD I PAY HER?  I am not making this up.  Some day she will approach me, hat in hand, for an interview - when my life becomes a big movie - & I will say, 'How much will you pay me' or just 'No, thanks.'

 

You mention so many sources & who do I trust?  I've not seen most of these sites Pete, been too busy with my own agenda.  I just do what God tells me & look at Brighteon sound bytes, sometimes whole videos {rarely} & used to read Sons of Liberty {but they are too religious in the Patriarchal way & OBSESSED with reporting the evils of police - while I like police a lot - they SAVED MY LIFE many times!} & used to check up on Alex Jones {he doesn't like feminists, or didn't in the past - also is extreme Patriarchal religious lol but I still respect him a lot & admire him.}  Should I check up on any of the sites you mention?  In this lifetime?  Lol, how much times does one need to do all these things?  I will ask God.

 

I trust Mike Adams of Brigtheon more than anyone on the internet.  Why?  He would NEVER take money from con men, - big money - to promote a product that turned out to be a FRAUD. Some time ago I saw a 'detox water' - incredibly expensive, which I purchased from a 'health food' site - & the reason I believed it to be authentic is it was advertised on Alex Jones.  I drank it for a couple months, having spent about $400 or so on it.  Then MIKE ADAMS, who used to be called 'the Health Ranger' tested it & it was DANGEROUS - filled with large doses of ALUMINUM & other bad chemicals.  Wow.  Were we deceived!  So many people had believed in it.  The health food site told us they would give us back our money if we returned the unused portions, which I did, & I assume they put my credit card $$$ back - but didn't check. 

 

Mike Adams must be making use of his health skills because he looks as young as he did ten years ago.  Poor Alex Jones has gained a lot of weight.  Possibly from stress as he takes great risks against the Shadow Govt.  He went to Bohemian Grove once & spoke to them as they came out - lot of scary things he does against the system.

 

I need to know what the MAGA crowd is, who Robert Malone is & what has he done?  And what does it mean to sell the working class down the river?  And exactly what do you mean by 'controlled opposition?'

 

I am appalled so far by what you said Wolf said - against Goddesses & are the Gods coming back?  I have to check up on this & will view her latest video.  Do you recall a couple years ago I said that the men would be more affected by the jab than women - which might b a good result of it?  I was not being MEAN or hating men, but to destroy Patriarchy & its agenda, Mother God is removing men off the planet, as Dr. Bryan Sykes said.  I don't hate men as you know, hate what they do - the one third that 'fell from Heaven.'  The two thirds, unfortunately, as we three know, mostly obey the evil ones on top.

From Wolf:   "Respectfully I’ve given this point a lot of thought and history shows women are as sadistic as men given the chance."

Hardy har har.  Here Naomi shows either her ignorance or is bowing & scraping to Patriarchy.  I thought she was smart.  Not in this field.  This is EXACTLY what each UNEDUCATED MORON says to me on the internet & in bars when I discuss the issues {the men} & it goes along with 'not all men are bad'  & 'if men go extinct, humanity will' & dumb shyt like that.

 

Sheesh.  She is OUT like a light.

 

William, if you can, put parts of your new book on our blog.

It will help humanity.  We must keep pushing.

 

I still have the tinnitus 24/7 but not terribly loud.  When I'm outside doing things I scarcely notice it.  Am taking mega vitamins for it & trust it will vanish.

 

Listened to 3.5 hours of the life & revelations of St. Gertrude the Great again & channeled her.  

 

She agrees with my entire life, all that I've done, including the sex.  She knows, she understands. She says I'm living a new era, I was sent to do what I do.  She says they were FORCED to act, to speak, to write as they did or else they would have been removed from the good will of society.  I'm one of the few people who clings to her as Guru, as she's all mysticism & out of the depths of most people, as they haven't the slightest idea what mysticism is & have no talent for it.  But I am 100% mystical like her, I am her spiritual daughter.

 

I skimmed through her article on substack, it's as long as a book.  It seems she is saying Satan is here.  What else is new?  She should take lessons from me to find out how Satan lives here instead of what she is doing, which is so convoluted & boringly complicated.  I speak directly & to the point, she is CONFUSED.  She seems to settle at the end that Satan is here.  And like you said, he's been here thousands of years in Patriarchy.  She doesn't get it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Patriarchy Has A Kill Switch, And We Already Know What It Is

By Ajax The Great (Pete Jackson)

(Originally posted on The Chalice and the Flame blog, 2023 version)

(Original version of this article from 2020 can be found here)

Author Yuri Zavorotny wrote a great article four years ago for Medium, in which he articulates something that we all intuitively know (but often don't want to say out loud) about the patriarchy and how to end it.  After first establishing that patriarchy is inherently evil (and thus cannot be redeemed), he then goes on about what holds it all together.  This thing that holds the entire construct all together is its sine qua non and thus is it's own Achilles' heel, and that thing is control of female sexuality, and the primary tool used to control that is slut-shaming.  That is, the shaming of Women for expressing their sexuality in the way they choose.  And thus the "kill switch" is to put an end to this utterly toxic and outmoded practice of slut-shaming.

Wait, what?  There is still slut-shaming in 2023?  Absolutely.  It has diminished somewhat since the (largely male-defined) "sexual revolution" half a century ago, to be sure, but it is still there. The double standard still exists, and it has in fact become more of a double bind in which Women are expected to be "sexy" (as defined by males) but not sexual by their own definition.  And ending it is thus the unfinished business of both feminism and the real sexual revolution for Women.

(That's not the only double bind here, there is also the historical one in which Women are expected to both obey men as well as be the "gatekeepers" of sex, with no way to opt out of either contradictory requirement.)

As Yuri Zavorotny himself says:

So here is our kill switch: we stop telling women when, where and with whom she is allowed to get involved romantically. Her body, her choice. And she is perfectly capable of making it a responsible choice, thank you very much.

And lest anyone misunderstand his words, read too much into it, or try to put words in his mouth:

NOTE: This is not to suggest that anyone should change their own behavior. We do whatever we are comfortable with. That, of course, includes staying monogamous, still a perfectly valid choice. But it can not be justified as a moral choice anymore -- rather, it is a personal preference.

Female sexuality (or more accurately, female-defined sexuality) is an extremely powerful force to be reckoned with, which is why the patriarchy has gone out of its way to suppress it (and/or supplant it with male-defined sexuality).  As I have noted before, the suppression of Women's sexuality was not entirely about maintaining control over the male bloodline (though that was originally a major part of it), but more generally about power and control over Women directly, as well as over other men indirectly via artificial scarcity.  Let that sink in for a moment. 

In a similar vein, patriarchy's favorite brainchild, capitalism, needs scarcity (whether real or artificial) to function.  That is how the oligarchs control the serfs.  And the kill switch of capitalism is thus to give it the one thing it cannot surivive--abundance.  The analogy should be apparent now.

Ending slut-shaming will not end patriarchy overnight, of course, but is nonetheless necessary for it to end sooner rather than later.  And if we wait until we return to full-blown Matriarchy before liberating Women's sexuality, we will never be ready, as Women's sexual liberation is a key step on the path to Matriarchy.  That is, if we make the perfect the enemy of the good, we ultimately end up with neither.

Furthermore, as I have noted in another article, any attempt at a reactionary "sexual counterrevolution" is of course doomed to backfire and ultimately fail to benefit Women on balance.

One thing needs to be clear.  As hard as we fight for the right to say "yes" to sex, we must also fight twice as hard for the right to say "NO" as well.  The LAST thing we want is for sex of any kind to be perceived as mandatory, so enthusiastic and mutual consent must be a precondition for all sexual acts, period. And that is true for both Women and men, by the way.  Also, we must be careful not to fall in the trap of the "reverse double standard" that has become in vogue in some circles these days (Oprah and Dr. Phil, I'm looking at YOU!), in which men are the ones vilified for their sexuality while Women are ignored (if not celebrated) for doing the same exact things.  Doing so is a sure path to a sort of "reverse patriarchy", not the Matriarchy proper that we should be aiming for.  The same goes for a "reverse double bind" as well.

Put simply:  Women should have the absolute right to be as sexual--or not--as they themselves want to be, without the need for justification or apology to anyone, period.

So what are we waiting for?  Kill Switch Engage!  Let the planetary healing begin!

..........................................................................................................................................

Comments from Rasa Von Werder:

Wowie, Zowie, this is great.  It brings to mind re my own mission.  Think.  If I truly am a Woman of God like I say, what do I come to bring that no other God-Messenger has delivered?  Think - Buddha, Jesus, the prophets, all the great Saints of all religions.  They brought truth - all of them - they brought holiness, they brought healing, they brought salvation in all sorts of forms.  But what did I bring that is UNIQUELY MINE & not theirs & none of them brought?  SEX.  I am not a Woman of God IN SPITE of my adult trade work & sexuality, but rather, my SEXUALITY is part & parcel of my MISSION.  I bring the package of God Power & inside it is my blatant or inherent sexuality, the work & the fact that I have admitted to having sex with lots of men, before & after my 30 years of celibacy.  It is PART OF MY MESSAGE & the unique & unusual part of my ministry, which I alone, in all of history, as a Woman of God, brought forth.  And WHY did God choose me & send me for this mission, equipped with a beautiful body to show the world?  To take the stigma off sex for women, to liberate & empower women by removing that sex is a sin for them.  And yes, this KILLS Patriarchy!  Hurrah! 

Latest Articles by Ajax The Great (Pete Jackson)

By Ajax the Great (Pete Jackson)

(Originally posted on the True Spirit of America Party blog)

WHY THE WHO PANDEMIC TREATY NEEDS SERIOUS REVISION BEFORE IT CAN BE SIGNED 

The current draft of the WHO pandemic treaty is very close to being signed by President Biden.  And while the "fact checkers" vociferously deny that the treaty will sign over America's hard-won national sovereignty to the WHO in the event of a future global health emergency, there is still good reason to refuse to sign it until serious revisions are made.  

First, the constitutionally questionable practice of it possibly even going into effect without the Senate's "advice and consent" (as is typically required to ratify international treaties), let alone the utterly specious notion that treaties can even supersede the Constitution itself, is enough to give anyone a severe case of the heebie-jeebies, or at least any serious student of history that gives a crap about the Constitution.  That alone is bad enough. 

But the most important problem of all, is what the treaty, by omission, does NOT require of its signatories.  The following is what we believe any such treaty absolutely MUST require explicitly, in light of the past three years of authoritarianism:

To be prohibited in any circumstances:

• All lockdowns, in theory or practice, must be strictly prohibited. 
• All mask mandates outside of a healthcare setting must be strictly prohibited.
• All forced business closures must be strictly prohibited unless fully compensated by, and entirely at the expense of, whatever government imposed such closures.
• All forced school closures lasting more than ten (10) consecutive school days must be strictly prohibited. 
• All vaccine mandates, passports or coercion, in theory or practice, must be strictly prohibited for any vaccine that 1) has been on the market for less than ten (10) years and/or 2) has not been conclusively proven to be truly safe and effective.
• Launching or marketing any sort of vaccine, or anything that identifies as such, without the proper safety and effectiveness testing and/or without following GMP, shall be strictly prohibited. 
• Any attempt to censor alternative viewpoints shall be strictly prohibited. 
• Any attempt to officially deny or censor a known effective treatment or prophylaxis shall be strictly prohibited. 
• Any attempt to abolish cash shall be strictly prohibited. 
• Social credit scoring shall be strictly prohibited. 

To be strongly discouraged overall:

• Blanket mask mandates in healthcare settings shall be strongly discouraged. 
• School closures of any kind shall be strongly discouraged.
• Business closures of any kind shall be strongly discouraged. 
• Vaccine mandates, passports, or coercion of any kind shall be strongly discouraged regardless of the vaccine or how supposedly safe it is.
• Mandatory quarantine of exposed individuals without symptoms shall be strongly discouraged for any disease for which the body of research evidence does not support (i.e. influenza and coronaviruses).
• Gathering restrictions or any other restrictions on freedom of association shall be strongly discouraged. 
• Travel bans and restrictions shall be strongly discouraged. 
• Mass testing with PCR shall be strongly discouraged in most circumstances. 
• Central bank digital currency (CBDC) shall be strongly discouraged (and shall be prohibited if it replaces cash entirely).
• Digital ID shall be strongly discouraged. 

To be encouraged:

• Informed consent
• Bodily autonomy 
• Human rights
• Civil rights and liberties 
• Free speech
• Public health (as it was originally founded)
• Early treatment and prophylaxis 
• Nutrition 
• Holistic view of health
• National sovereignty 

Definitions:

• "Lockdown" shall be defined as any mandatory "stay home", "shelter in place", or equivalent order lasting more than 24 consecutive hours, for all or part of the population, for any reason.  Any nighttime curfew order lasting more than three (3) consecutive nights would also meet this definition as well.  These must be off the table.
• "Mask mandate" shall be defined as any attempt to force or coerce anyone to cover all or any part of one's face for the purposes of disease control, or any penalties for not complying for same.
• "Vaccine mandate" shall be defined as any attempt to force or coerce any person to receive anything that identifies as a vaccine.
• "Vaccine passport" shall be defined as any identifier bestowed on a person that gives certain privileges conditional on having received anything that identifies as a vaccine.
• All other definitions have their usual meaning, and apply in theory or practice.

That should be the FLOOR for any such treaty, as even that may be too much leeway. Then, and ONLY then, should the USA agree to any WHO pandemic treaty.

THREE NUTRIENTS. THREE TABLETS.  THREE LOST YEARS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN AVERTED.

We have noted this before, but we will again.

From the ever-insightful Dr. Steve Kirsch's recent Substack article, in a nutshell:

"Special mention for the fact that the entire pandemic was completely unnecessary. 3 supplements work better than vaccines and are safe and cheap. All the lockdowns, masking, vaccines, mandates, social distancing, etc. were all unnecessary. And even though this is now known, nobody will pay attention since it will make them look bad.

"Uptake of vitamin C, vitamin D and zinc were significantly associated with the reduced risk of infection and severity of COVID-19 (OR: 0.006 (95% CI: 0.03–0.11) (p = 0.004)) and (OR: 0.03 (95% CI: 0.01–0.22) (p = 0.005))... this study was conducted before the start of mass vaccination against COVID-19 in Bangladesh."

https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/23/5029

That's over 150x decreased risk just from taking these 3 dirt-cheap supplements that everyone has known to be safe + effective for decades! And it was all pre-vax, it was for the original Wuhan strain that was most dangerous!"

Read that again, and again, and again and let it sink in.  Vitamin C, Vitamin D, and Zinc.  Those three things alone would have largely defanged and declawed this overall already relatively humdrum virus to begin with, which was basically a classic super-flu at worst, and never an existential threat.

And especially for Vitamin D, but the others too, this was confirmed time and again.  And again and again.

Oh, and one of the other thing that we at the TSAP have long advocated, the humble xylitol nasal spray, has also been confirmed yet again as prophylaxis.

It gets even worse still for the powers that be, apparently, when one also notes that the standard of care for patients with post-viral pneumonia was abruptly changed worldwide, at or before the beginning of the pandemic.  And not for the better, either. The change was to no longer give antibiotics for pneumonia if Covid was thought to be the cause, even though it was very likely that many if not most of such deaths were from secondary bacterial infections.  And antibiotics would have been given had they not been inexplicably removed from the protocols, and thus deliberately withheld from patients for political reasons.  A good chunk of excess deaths could thus easily be attributed to that alone.  

Just #3tablets of azithromycin or doxycycline would often have been enough to save their lives.

And don't forget to read the eye-opening Spartacus Letter if you haven't already.

In other words, all of the lockdowns, closures, masks, jabs, and NPIs were basically in vain.  Not that these things would have ever really had any hope or redeeming quality in the first place, of course. 

Three nutrients.  Three tablets.  Three lost years that we will never get back, that could have all been averted, to say nothing of all of the gargantuan excess deaths that resulted.  How will they ever live this down?  And will future generations ever forgive us?

WHY NATTOKINASE SHOULD BE A HOUSEHOLD BUZZWORD NOW

The ever-insightful Dr. Peter McCullough has recently pointed out a way to detox from the jabs.  An enzyme supplement called Nattokinase, from fermented soybeans, can apparently dissolve the toxic spike protein, and also thins the blood as well to reduce the dangerous clotting that the jabs are famous for.  He discusses all of this on his recent Substack post here.

So that looks like another good way to detox from the jabs.  We already knew for a while now that N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is also good as well, in that it cleaves the disulfide linkage in the spike protein.  And zeolites and Vitamin C have been recommended by others as well, and resveratrol and fisetin, and also pine needle tea and omega-3 fatty acids.

Of course, the number one best way to avoid the toxic consequences of the jabs is to not get any (more) jabs in the first place.  In other words, nip it in the bud.  DUH!  But failing that, all hope is still not lost.

For more damage control for those who got jabbed, see here as well.

DISCLAIMER:  The above should not be considered medical advice, so be sure to consult a nutritionally-informed physician before beginning any supplement program.

Latest Articles From Ajax The Great (Pete Jackson)

By Ajax The Great (Pete Jackson)

(Originally posted on the True Spirit of America Party blog)

THE VERDICT IS IN:  FREEDOM WINS!

We had already noted that Sweden was thoroughly vindicated for eschewing lockdowns, masks, and overall stringency during the pandemic.  Just like Belarus, Nicaragua, Tanzania, and even Brazil did similar to or better than their stricter neighbors in terms of cumulative all cause deaths as well.  

"But America is different!" the lockdown zealots speciously claim.  We are somehow too affluent, too spoiled, too poor, too unequal, too racist, too diverse, too multicultural, too fractured, too lazy, too workaholic, too unhealthy, too coddled, too independent, too dependent, too immature, too precocious, too low-trust, too credulous, too individualistic, too herd mentality, too smart for our own good, too stupid, too educated, too uneducated, too fragile, too many problems already, too (insert favorite adjective here, the more contradictory the better) to be able to even compare ourselves to other countries, let alone copy even in part what the world's few remaining free countries did without disastrous consequences resulting.  Or something. 

Of course, in this country, twelve US states (nearly a quarter of all states) basically eschewed lockdowns as well, most famously South Dakota, and several additional states were either much less stringent than the national average and/or only locked down briefly before opening up and lifting restrictions fairly quickly, most famously Florida, Georgia, and Texas.

And yet, now a new 50-state study finds that among US states and DC, less stringent states were not significantly different from more stringent ones in terms of health outcomes, but they did do significantly better on economic outcomes and education outcomes as well as overall outcomes.  For example, when adjusted for age and pre-existing conditions, Florida and California (with polar opposite policies) ended up being within error bounds of each other and the national average in terms of death rates.  And as we have noted earlier, this was not the only American study that arrived at similar (if not even more damning) conclusions either, namely that lockdowns and related restrictions were essentially all pain and no gain.  Thus it looks like freedom wins hands down, both in the USA as well as abroad. 

Let America be America again!

UPDATE:  Yet another international study found that not only were lockdowns, overall stringency, and jabs associated with higher death rates, but also HCQ and IVM were associated with lower death rates, just as the late Dr. Vladimir Zev Zelenko famously predicted back in 2020.  In a world of Lysenkos, be a Zelenko.

ARE THEY ALREADY TELEGRAPHING THE NEXT PLANDEMIC?

You know the Covid pandemic is effectively over (i.e. now endemic) when the fearmongering MSM is already moving on to the next (theoretical) pandemic....or is that plandemic?

In recent days, there have been several articles in the MSM about bird flu (H5N1 avian influenza, to be precise) now seemingly infecting mammals as well as birds, and how this may some day soon result in it jumping to humans and perhaps causing a pandemic.  There was recently an outbreak at a mink farm (remind me again why we are still "farming" minks in 2023?) in which there was likely mink to mink transmission, which has some scientists nervous now.  There have been some wild mammals catching it sporadically, such as otters and foxes, but those were most likely isolated instances in which they caught it from wild birds, which many wild mammals eat.

H5N1 bird flu appears to have originated decades ago on poultry farms, particularly in China, from where it eventually spread to wild birds.  The conditions there are often quite deplorable, and provide the perfect petri dish for incubating viruses.  There are many strains, and the deadliest strain appears to have a 50% fatality rate* when humans (rarely) catch it from the infected birds they work with.  Of course, even if it does at some point make the jump to human to human transmission, that does not necessarily mean it will retain its lethality, nor does it mean it will become contagious enough to cause a pandemic.

Of course, the oligarchs and their lackeys  may very well make it happen with "gain of function" (i.e. gain of lethality and/or contagion) research for the next plandemic.  We don't always know for sure what they are up to, but if it does become the next plandemic, remember that they telegraphed the idea well in advance, as they usually tend to do.

And whether it is natural origin, lab origin, accidental, deliberately, or hoax, keep the following things in mind about any respiratory virus pandemic:

1. Lockdowns don't work
2. Masks don't work
3. Most NPIs (non-pharmaceutical interventions), including but not limited to school closures, don't work for very long or very well at all
4. "Flatten the curve" usually does NOT reduce the number of cases or deaths in the long run, and merely drags them out for longer by delaying the inevitable 
5. The best time to prepare hospitals is always yesterday. "Clearing the decks" by cancelling "non-essential" procedures for prolonged periods is an absolute last resort, and doing it when there is no immediate local need for it does far more harm than good
6. ALL workers are essential workers
7. Panic always backfires.  Keep calm and carry on.
8. Vaccines nearly always come far too late and/or take far too long to work
9. Hastily-made vaccines of any type are generally a risky proposition
10. Novel experimental mRNA or other gene therapy "vaccines" are particularly risky, and are unlikely to have a NET favorable effect, when adverse effects are taken into account
11. "Leaky" vaccines (i.e. every single flu and Covid vaccine to date) do NOT stop transmission of the virus, have ZERO justification to mandate or coerce people to get them, and over-vaccinating a population with those can in fact backfire mightily 
12. Early antiviral treatment and prophylaxis are the best bet.  Repurposing generics makes far more sense than waiting for a new and patented "miracle cure" from Big Pharma while the bodies pile up
13. Don't forget to take your vitamins, especially Vitamin C, Vitamin D, and Zinc. And also Thiamine and Niacin.
14. Ventilate, ventilate, ventilate indoor air
15. Slopes are MUCH slipperier than they appear
16. Never surrender your right to be with the people you love.  Like, ever.
17. Once you give up your civil rights, even temporarily, it is VERY hard if not impossible to get them back.  Power concedes NOTHING without a fight!

Every single one of the above truths was ultimately learned the hard way.  And God willing, may we never have to learn the hard way again.  Like, ever.

*NOTE:  The bandied-about 50% fatality rate is the case fatality rate (CFR) for the tiny number of known human cases caught from birds over the years, based on the most pathogenic strains of H5N1.  The infection fatality rate (IFR), however, remains unknown and could perhaps be as much as tenfold lower.  But even then, that would put it at "only" two to three times deadlier than the infamous 1918 pandemic flu.  Of course, if it ever, God forbid, becomes contagious enough to sustain human to human transmission with an R value greater than 1, the CFR and IFR may very well drop further.  But as we have seen with Covid, if the R value is high enough, it does not really need to have a very high IFR or CFR to get a considerably "high score" in terms of total deaths.  SARS-2 was a much less deadly virus than the original SARS-1, but more contagious and much more subtle and thus much harder to contain, so the former had a much higher death toll than the latter, which was too "hot" and thus very easily contained.  And MERS ("camel flu") was an even deadlier coronavirus still in terms of IFR and CFR, rivaling or exceeding bird flu, but fortunately it was not very contagious among humans, so it was a flash in the pan.