Sunday, 6 October 2019

XIX THE NEW RELIGION

                                                                       
Embodiment of God
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             10-6-19-The New Religion XIX-Woman Thou Art God

START WHERE YOU ARE!

Whatever religion you are in, if you care for it, start practicing Woman Thou Art God along with it!

Woman, simply by REMOVING THE PATRIARCHAL AGENDA, you can continue its practice while at the same time being One with Woman, Thou Art God (The Religion).

Definition of AGENDA:  list, plan, outline, or the like, of things to be done, matters to be acted or voted upon

REMOVE FROM YOUR PATRIARCHAL RELIGION:

One:  Hate of women (& discrimination of them) 

Two:  Violence (Crusades, ‘holy wars’, terrorism, suicide bombings)

Three:  Child abuse, pedophilia, child neglect 

Four:  Circumcision of boys & clitoral removal from girls (partial castration, child abuse)

Five:  Animal abuse, species-ism (Inhumane treatment of animals, sacrifice of animals, depriving animals of habitats & food, depriving animals of freedom & happiness)
Six:  Planned poverty (Depriving people of decent wage, ‘untouchable’ caste class, exploitation of the poor, weak & vulnerable)

Seven:  Slavery of people & animals (including wage slaves)

ADD OR INCLUDE INTO YOUR RELIGION & LIFESTYLE:

One:  Woman is God, leader of the family & world.  Man is a ‘lesser God’ whom She created as a HELPMATE – He is to work UNDER HER AUTHORITY for whatever She wants or needs – be it to remain single, married, polygamous for her, having children or not.

He works – He tries to please her, keep her happy, whatever She desires.

He can LEAVE but all women in our society demand obedience from the man – The woman DOES NOT OBEY THE MAN.

(There should be a record kept of the relationships, when a man leaves a woman or a woman dismisses a man.  He explains why he left; she explains why she dismissed him.  These records can be accessed by any other woman who is interested.
In this way, males who are unsatisfactory will not get away with what they do – if they are dismissed for transgressions,– they cannot easily bounce around & affect other women.  Women will know ahead of time if there be any risks or detriments.)

The guidelines for men will be written down – counseling can be given through internet, phone, social networks & group classes.  One-on-one sessions of men learning from women will be discouraged for security reasons; we practice SAFE SPACE for women. Usually when men want to be alone it’s to try to get sex, & they can get dangerous.

However women can be alone with a man, of course, if they choose to do so, but no man can demand to be alone with a woman for any purpose.

Children:  Males are never to be left alone with a child or children under legal age. Even if they are not abusers, they have not the talent to take care of children; they are not biologically designed for nurturing / compassion / kindness / gentleness.  Nothing wrong with them loving children, let them show affection, recreate with them in public – with matriarchal women present. 
(In the ancient days of Mother God, kids had many mothers.  The grandmas, aunts, single women, all lived in the same premises – this is the proper way to raise children – This made it WAY EASIER for a woman to raise & protect her children.  The nuclear family was created by Patriarchs to give them control over the isolated woman & access to children for sex.)

The mothers & the religion classes will teach children their roles in life:  the female being the leader, the male the obedient one.  Males must help women, they are workers & protectors of women & children, not the abusers too many have become.

Children will be taught THERE IS A GOD & SHE IS OUR MOTHER. 

They will be shown that GOD IS WITHIN US, all of us, but we are not EQUAL in our roles in life.  Men are not EQUAL to women, as they do not have two X chromosomes – they cannot reproduce - & the frontal lobes of their brains are ASLEEP.

Being unequal does not mean we love the less-than- us.  My pets are not equal to me, they were not created as my leaders – I lead them.  But I shelter & feed them & give them love.  I love all animals, although they do not guide & teach me - I am at times their caretaker or benefactor – even so – I never deprive them of life, liberty or the pursuit to happiness (except when I eat meat or fish who I wish were killed in a humane way, but usually they are not, our religion people will work on this.)

Children will be taught all the traditional decent aspects of religion, as taught in the Christian Church & other Churches (they stole these religions from us originally anyway) for example:

***  Who made me?  God made me.

***  Why did God create me?  To know, love & serve Her, & be happy with Her in eternity. 

***  What is the purpose of life?   To live in Love, to Love myself & others & to live in the joy of Love forever in eternity.

***  What is sin?  Sin is the rejection of God, who is Love.  Sin is also offences against God by hurting others or God’s Creation.
 Sin does not look to God as our greatest End, our Goal, our happiness – sinners (those who love sin, not those who commit it & repent) look elsewhere for their satisfaction, & they miss out on that which is the Greatest.

***  Who goes to eternal Heaven, who goes to Hell?  Those who accept God & Her Love go to Heaven; those who reject God & Her Love end up in Hell. 
Hell is of one’s own making, a person implodes upon themselves, where within them, there is nothing to hold onto,  it’s barren, deserted, empty & painful to be without God on earth or in eternity.  When one has a body they might not FEEL HELL because their body camouflages it, but when the body dies, they see where the soul is.  God is our EVERYTHING, all joy, beauty, Truth, serenity, peace, security.  Without all this, we are lost.

This is a small sample of theology children would be taught – the Catechism will be enumerated later on.

Children must be taught about God from an early age – from the time they are born & can understand the simplest things.  They must be taught to meditate, pray, different types of prayer, & they must learn Faith, Hope & Charity, & all the virtues.  They must be encouraged in the virtues daily, bearing their sufferings & frustrations, patience, hope, faith, fortitude, etc.  They must learn to ask God for things & expect results every day – even healing when they or those they love are ill.

They must learn about the ‘Gifts of the Holy Spirit’, the Gifts of devotion, understanding, Power – How God manifests in us.

They should also be taught to love & venerate NATURE, celebrating the seasons the way the agricultural, ancient religions did – Wicca, Pagans, Druids & such.  All the holidays of the seasons can be brought into our religion.  Our religion is not closed-in or closeted, it is open, free, accepting of all loving doctrines from all religions – whichever you choose to worship, go for it.

The MAIN DIFFERENCE in our religion is it goes back to the days of Mother God – female Priestesses - & females leading the family & the world.  And of course, there is no Patriarchal agenda in it, as in the old days before Patriarchy, we had peace – there was no poverty.  Everyone lived close to equal with resources, the Queens included.

Woman, Thou Art God!  Begin thinking how you will practice & promulgate this New Religion & set it into practice – today!

22 comments:

  1. Note to any males who happen to be reading this or any other post on this site, remember:

    THOU SHALT NOT DERAIL!

    That includes disruption, playing "devil's advocate", centering males, concern trolling, going off-topic, or any other form of verbal defecation. So don't do it!

    (I anticipate that at least some males who stumble upon this site will try such shenanigans.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. YES AJAX THEY USUALLY DO, WHEN WE GET ENOUGH TRAFFIC. EVENTUALLY WE WILL BE FLOODED WITH NAYSAYERS & WILLIAM WILL HAVE FUN IF HE READS & HAS TO REMOVE THEM ALL. WE ARE JUST BEGINNING SO THERE ISN'T MUCH REACTION, BUT THERE WILL BE & A LOT OF IT WILL BE NEGATIVE - HYSTERICAL MEN & WOMEN, DEMONICS & PATRIARCHS.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rasa, I have been meaning to comment on this, but I kept on forgetting over the years:

    (There should be a record kept of the relationships, when a man leaves a woman or a woman dismisses a man. He explains why he left; she explains why she dismissed him. These records can be accessed by any other woman who is interested.
    In this way, males who are unsatisfactory will not get away with what they do – if they are dismissed for transgressions,– they cannot easily bounce around & affect other women. Women will know ahead of time if there be any risks or detriments.)

    I would add that there is nothing inherently wrong with that, if such a thing is voluntary. But if such records and reporting were mandatory, that would come dangerously close to the Chinese "social credit" system with all of its myriad pitfalls. Most Women would probably prefer to keep at least some trysts "off the record" like the Mosuo often do. Just my $0.02.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's an idea to be considered Ajax, not set in stone. There are many ideas I am writing that will be flexible. This can be discussed & worked out by the elders & seen from many perspectives. You could be right, we shall see. We shall think, meditate & discuss! ,,,,,Rasa

    ReplyDelete
  5. What is China's Social Credit System, for those who don't already know?

    Short answer: it's every totalitarian's dream come true.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_System

    Per Wikipedia:

    "The Social Credit System (Chinese: 社会信用体系; pinyin: shèhuì xìnyòng tǐxì) is a national credit rating and blacklist being developed by the government of China. The social credit initiative calls for the establishment of a record system so that businesses, individuals and government institutions can be tracked and evaluated for trustworthiness. There are multiple forms of the social credit system being experimented with, while the national regulatory method is based on whitelisting (termed redlisting in China) and blacklisting."

    (And that's putting it nicely!)

    "China's Social Credit System has been implicated in a number of controversies. Western critics view social credit as an intrusive mechanism that infringes on privacy. In October 2018, U.S. Vice President Mike Pence criticized the social credit system, describing it as "an Orwellian system premised on controlling virtually every facet of human life."[114] In January 2019, George Soros criticized the social credit system, saying it would give CCP leader Xi Jinping "total control over the people of China"".

    "In December 2017, Human Rights Watch described the proposed social credit system as "chilling" and filled with arbitrary abuses."

    And that was BEFORE the plandemic. And the WEF (Davos Gang) allegedly wants something like that for the entire world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what the pitfalls would be, *especially* if it were applied to something as intimate as dating and mating. Anyone who has worked in show business is likely familiar with the ominous threat, "you'll never work in this town again", and social credit is, at best, a high tech version of that, and likely crossed with classic McCarthyism.

      Delete
    2. As for what I would suggest as an alternative way to protect Women from bad, evil, crappy, lowlife, toxic, and/or ne'er-do-well men who persist in their defection and bad behavior (i.e. that doesn't quite rise to the level of criminality but is still toxic) and then bounce back and forth on to the next Woman and so on, I'm afraid I unfortunately don't have any clear answers at this time. It is a classic trade-off between liberty and security, it seems, and thus perhaps a problem that may not have any solution in a free society.

      It is just something we will have to accept, I guess. In any case, the Mosuo don't seem to see the need for any sort of mandatory record keeping in that regard, nor do any other Matriarchal societies past or present.

      I will note that nowadays with the advent of the internet, word travels fast in terms of reputation. Throw in those ubiquitous Ring cameras, CCTV, and billions of smartphones with cameras, and in practice, privacy has already dwindled almost to the level of Jeremy Bentham's Panopticon, for better or worse. One partial solution in that vein would be a *voluntary* registry that Women can post reviews about men (as long as it is not libelous) without threat of censorship. Manosphere misogynistic men already apparently have their own site called "Register Her", (to the reader: do NOT look at it unless you really want to get in a rage!) so why can't Women turn the tables and have their own side called "Register Him", then? Again, *voluntary* is the key word here. And *decentralized* as well.

      Women could even do this right now if they wanted to. But it is ultimately something for future generations to decide.

      In my every deliberation on any such matters, I ask myself, if I knew I were to die tomorrow and be reincarnated as a Woman, what sort of world would I want to live in? And I nearly always keep coming back to the same answer.

      Thanks again :)

      Delete
  6. Wow Ajax, talk about 'food for thought'! It's a complicated issue. I think we shall throw this concern to the elders. These would be the women over 60 - maybe 62 & up. Assuming they have experience, how would they protect women from bad guys who are not criminals but have all sorts of detrimental traits? Criminals we shall expunge, blacklist them for sure - no holds barred, just there's the door & that's it. By criminal I mean stealing, abuse, violence, anything serious. But there is MENTAL & EMOTIONAL CRUELTY that appears under the radar. A person can hurt you just by being SILENT or by leaving every day to God knows where - bars, whoring - being a bisexual, searching for drugs - all kinds crap. This would not register as 'criminal.' They can also be SARCASTIC & constantly even in subtle ways, putting her down - Criticizing her. Women don't need that - we've been put down, criticized, devalued, swept aside long enough. I'm wondering if you're overreacting to my suggestion - as you said, males are already registering us. I will look that site up. No one is speaking about that that I've heard of. It's what they do to us, it seems to be permitted, but God forbid we use any restraint on them, even GOOD GUYS like you get upset! We are NOT NAZIS or COMMUNIST/TYRANTS, Chinese TORTURERS. This is a God-driven, God centered organizatin with the bywords same as Jesus Christ & the Saints. Why do you or would anyone fear we will do men in? It's simply reporting negative stuff like I said, being silent, morose, uncommunicative, not doing their chores or duties, not caring, not helping, going away to do secret or unknown things. Like being 'with the boys' & what do boys do? Drinking, drugs, whoring, plotting against women. No, I think you have overreacted Ajax. We need a registry. I shall look for that female registry. Thank you for opening the discussion. Rasa Von Werder

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the response, Rasa. Perhaps I did overreact a bit and read a bit too much into it. In any case, it will not be up to me or any other males to decide that. I don't think I have much else to add at this time.

      Best wishes,
      Ajax

      Delete
    2. Indeed it is a war. But in the long run, it is one that men have lost before the war began, despite winning nearly every battle. Men just don't realize it yet. (Much like the USA in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan.)

      Delete
    3. I guess the main reason why I overreacted was due to my long observation that "cancel culture" has really gotten out of hand in this country (and some others) in recent years, where literally everyone is guilty until proven innocent in a court of public opinion. It's the new McCarthyism. Once a person's reputation is ruined, and it really doesn't take very much, their life is basically over, often forever. That is largely why I so zealously and jealously guard my own reputation, almost literally with my life. And both genders are indeed guilty of this behavior nowadays, it seems.

      (Any readers who don't know what "cancel culture" is are free to Google it.)

      Combine that with creeping Orwellian tendencies on both sides of the Atlantic (and Pacific too) these days, and that doesn't make for anything good.

      I am well aware that you are nothing like that, of course.

      Best wishes,
      Ajax

      Delete
  7. Again, to defend our scrutiny. This strict application does not by any means, guarantee safety for our members! Ted Bundy, before he had a record would have passed as he was charming, articulate & attractive. John Wayne Gacey could also pass before he had a record. Jeffrey Dahmer might also pass before he was ever arrested. There is evil lurking in the hearts of men that cannot be scrutinized except by God, or a psychic medium. It gives us partial protection.
    Then there are those who through relationships have proven themselves bad risks for closeness {some women want relationships, not ony sex} - that's where the registry comes in, that you object to - {taking away human rights you say}. - The women who write reports on males they had bad experiences with, of course it's voluntary. No one forces them to explain. It could be as simple & innocent as
    'He's a slob. Never cleans up his own mess, expects you to do everything. Drinks milk straight out of the bottle.'

    I also understand that we will WEED OUT the majority of males who'd like to meet females. It will be AGAINST OUR RULES strictly for a woman to associate with males who have not gone through the net. They will be reprimanded & in danger of being ousted from the community. {The males will try to persuade them to do this, they want to be free, let her take chances & risk her safety. Some will be naive & gullible & do it.} Whoever doesn't mind filling out the data will have a clean record & good intentions. No men with past records - no men yet married - no men who intend to do a crime or have done a crime, will want to sign up. Men who are pure of heart, good intentions, good past records are most likely to join. That's what we want.
    If we only have one newcomer a week attend, it's no big deal - we have fun anyway. We'll practice dancing, have contests & any show business training we have conducted, such as musical instruments or singing or reciting - this is a place to perform, show their stuff. it will inspire them to practice.
    PS - Regards reputations, the info discovered remains within the Order, not for public knowledge. Rasa Von Werder

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If it only applies to within the Order and for its members, that is a different story, I guess. I would still personally consider such rules to be a bit too strict, but that's just me. I of course have no say on what goes on in the Order, as it is only for Women. I guess if someone doesn't want to live under such rules, they should simply not join then. Fair enough. We will just have to agree to disagree about this I guess.

      Delete
  8. The registry I mentioned is apparently defunct as of now, as it was nearly a decade ago that I heard about it. Thank God for small mercies, I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  9. One more thing. Pete, you’re reacting as if this will apply to the whole world & all men in it. This is just one Order trying to start out. Look at the Amish, Hutterites, Mennonites & whatever. Surely it does not frighten you that they have strict rules, ideas, dress codes, behavior & all that - to deviate means to be shunned. A group has a right to make its own rules, that’s what I’m doing. You’re acting like my ideas will apply to the entire world! Let us begin this way, hope for the best. I’m just trying to start a Matriarchal community good for women. I am including men with reservation. Shall I exclude them completely? Let the women run amuck so to speak, find their own men to have sex with with no scrutiny or reservations, references & information on them? Is that what you want? Will that make you happy? Rasa

    ReplyDelete
  10. I guess I don't have any real plans or solutions in that regard at this time. (Or, at least none that wouldn't come across as being too cavalier, such as a short of "shore leave".) I don't think I have anything further to add at this time, except to note again that this is ultimately a classic trade-off between liberty and safety. Not everyone will agree on where on that spectrum is appropriate, and what constitutes an acceptable versus unacceptable risk, and that's fine.

    Best wishes,
    Pete

    ReplyDelete
  11. OK try to imagine years from now. You have 3 daughters, 12, 15 & 17. They are all interested in males, - what do you do to protect them? Understand my position. As a leader of women who have been beaten in battle in the Gender War, I must now protect them from further asssault mentally/spiritually {with philosophies, religions & customs against women,} physically & emotionally. As a leader I have to anticipate all that men have done & will do if given the room - how do I stop them & give females Safe Space, while still giving them freedom to interact with men? That's what I'm facing & trying to sort out. You probably never had reason to think this out before & instead of seeing it from the male POV see it from mine - a leader of young, innocent, naive or even mature, experienced women--all of us been hurt as all the slaves in those days were, who now want to be free. Think of our freedom, not men's. How do we get free of this gender who has been our enemy? Do you imagine letting males do whatever they want will be the solution, little restrictions put on them? No scrunity, no restraints? They have destroyed women in the past & they will do it again. That's how I see it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fair enough. To clarify, I was thinking of it more in terms of being restrictions on Women's freedom of association, rather than men's. (That argument of course can be answered with, if they don't want to live under such rules, simply don't join then.) But either way, I don't think I have anything further to add at this time. Clearly, there are no ready-made easy answers.

      Best wishes,
      Pete

      Delete
    2. I forgot one thing I should have said before: for the dances, it would probably best to have separate dances for ages 12-17 only on the one hand and 18+ only on the other. (And maybe some mixed dances as well if the elders approve.) That's really the only other thing I had to add at this time.

      Best wishes,
      Pete

      Delete